Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026): Educating for Complexity: Intersectionality, Decolonial Approaches to Teaching, and Practices of Care in Education

School, Polycrisis, and Power. Micro-spaces of Freedom in Contemporary Education

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2026oa23163
Submitted
giugno 29, 2026
Published
2026-07-28

Abstract

Decolonial and intersectional perspectives, together with the concepts of polycrisis and scalarity, provide useful interpretative frameworks for understanding the transformations affecting contemporary school systems. These approaches challenge the idea of knowledge as stable and centralized, highlighting instead its distributed nature and the corresponding need to redistribute power across different subjects, contexts, and levels. Building on this theoretical framework, this paper examines the growing sense of disconnection experienced by both teachers and students. This condition can be interpreted as a form of alienation arising from the difficulty individuals face in recognizing themselves within the educational processes they inhabit, particularly because of the gap between their lived experiences and the languages, forms of rationality, and practices institutionally recognized as legitimate. At the same time, both teachers and students encounter increasing difficulties in participating in the construction of meaning. The paper argues that these transformations cannot be addressed solely through methodological innovations or organizational reforms; rather, they require a rethinking of the conditions for participation in educational processes and of the relationship between knowledge and power. In light of the current power relations, the paper explores the possibility of fostering situated forms of student participation and agency, which we define as “micro-spaces of freedom”. Although these do not constitute a systemic solution, they enable new ways of meaning-making and alternative forms of educational relationships informed by an ethics of care.

References

  1. Apple M.W. (2019). Ideology and Curriculum. New York: Routledge.
  2. Apple M.W., Gomes De Lima I. and Gandin L.A. (2026). Introduction: Education and the politics of interruption: Does the right always win? In: Apple M.W., Gomes De Lima I. and Gandin L.A., editors, Education and the Politics of Interruption: Does the Right Always Win? London: Routledge.
  3. Biesta G. (2017). The Rediscovery of Teaching. London: Routledge.
  4. Boysen G.A. (2024). A critical analysis of the research evidence behind CAST's universal design for learning guidelines. Policy Futures in Education, 22(7): 1219-1238. DOI: 10.1177/1478210324125542.
  5. Capolla L.M., Gratani F., Pentucci M., Giannandrea L. and Rossi P.G. (2023). What relationship between designing and regulating in times of emergency? In: Perla L., Agrati L.S., Vinci V. and Scarinci A., editors, ISATT2023. Living and Leading in the Next Era: Connecting Teaching, Research, Citizenship and Equity. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia, 34-36.
  6. Capolla L.M., Giannandrea L., Gratani F., Pentucci M. and Rossi P.G. (2025). Come progettare quando l’imprevisto è ontologico? In: Sorzio P. e Bocchi B., a cura di, I metodi per la ricerca sulle pratiche scolastiche per favorire l’apprendimento. Atti del convegno SIRD, Trieste 2025. Vol. 1. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 28-34.
  7. Castells M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  8. Collins P.H. (2019). Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
  9. Crenshaw K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 1: 139-167. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.
  10. de Sousa Santos B. (2016). Epistemologies of the south and the future. From the European South: A Transdisciplinary Journal of Postcolonial Humanities, 1: 17-29. Available at: https://www.fesjournal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/3.2016-1.Santos.pdf.
  11. de Sousa Santos B. (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.
  12. Escobar A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
  13. European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture and Gambi L. (2026). The Teaching Profession in the EU: A Comparative Analysis Building upon the TALIS 2024 Results. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  14. Fraser N. (2022). Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System Is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet ‒ and What We Can Do About It. London: Verso.
  15. Fraser N. and Jaeggi R. (2019). Capitalismo. Una conversazione nella teoria critica. Milano: Meltemi.
  16. Freire P. (2011). La pedagogia degli oppressi. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
  17. Gillborn D. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3): 277-287. DOI: 10.1177/1077800414557827.
  18. Hobson C. (2022). Polycrisis: In This Valley of Dying Stars. Available at: https://imperfectnotes.substack.com/p/polycrisis.
  19. hooks b. (1981). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
  20. hooks b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
  21. Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Latour B. (2012). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  23. Lawrence M., Homer-Dixon T., Janzwood S., Rockström J., Renn O. and Donges J.F. (2024). Global polycrisis: The causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7: e6. DOI: DOI: 10.1017/sus.2024.1.
  24. Lyotard J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  25. Merleau-Ponty M. (2012). Fenomenologia della percezione. Milano: Bompiani.
  26. Mignolo W.D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
  27. Morin E. (2000). La testa ben fatta. Riforma dell’insegnamento e riforma del pensiero. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  28. Noddings N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  29. Norlund A. and Levinsson M. (2026). A critical discourse analysis of the concept of universal design for learning (UDL). Policy Futures in Education, 24(2). DOI: 10.1177/14782103251374387.
  30. Pentucci M., Giannandrea L., Capolla L.M., Gratani F. and Rossi P.G. (2025). Ripensare la ricerca al tempo dell’imprevisto ontologico. In: Sorzio P. and Bocchi B., editors, I metodi per la ricerca sulle pratiche scolastiche per favorire l’apprendimento. Atti del convegno SIRD, Trieste 2025. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 65-76.
  31. Pickering A. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3): 559-589. DOI: 10.1086/230316.
  32. Pischetola M., Pentucci M., Giannandrea L., Capolla L.M., Gratani F. and Rossi P.G. (2026). Reclaiming Micro-Spaces of Agency and Network Generativity in Higher Education. In: Landri P. and Peruzzo F., editors, Shifting Landscapes in Digital Education Policy. Educational Governance Research, vol 29. Springer, Cham, pp. 37-57. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-29276-6_3.
  33. Rosa H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
  34. Rossi P.G. and Capolla L.M. (2024). La didattica dal digitale al postdigitale tra plenitude e responsabilità. In: Rivoltella P.C. and Rossi P.G., editors, Tecnologie per l’educazione. Milano: Pearson, 29-40.
  35. Rossi P.G. and Pentucci M. (2021). Progettazione come azione simulata: didattica dei processi e degli eco-sistemi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  36. Stiegler B. (2019). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  37. Tefera A.A., Powers J.M. and Fischman G.E. (2018). Intersectionality in education: A conceptual aspiration and research imperative. Review of Research in Education, 42(1): vii-xvii. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X18768504.
  38. Tooze A. (2022). Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times, 28 Octo-ber 2022.
  39. Tronto J.C. (2013). Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
  40. Walsh C.E. (2018). On decolonial dangers, decolonial cracks, and decolonial pedagogies rising. In: Mignolo W.D. and Walsh C.E., On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham: Duke University Press, 81-98.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>