Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Pedagogia dell'oggi: le sfide del presente. Percorsi di ricerca. Il tempo odierno del coronavirus

Speed and pressure of handwriting as critical issues of the contemporary age: A research in Italian students in early literacy

  • Simone Aparecida Capellini
  • Gabriela Franco dos Santos Liporaci
  • Isabela Pires Metzner
  • Noemi Del Bianco
  • Ilaria D'Angelo
  • Arianna Taddei
  • Catia Giaconi
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2020oa9507
Submitted
April 1, 2020
Published
2020-06-01

Abstract

Among the present critical issues that pedagogy and special teaching have to deal with it is possible to notice the contrast between writing and technology, up to the pertinent field of prevention and observation of dysgraphies. The authors present in the following article a study conducted in Italy aimed at evaluating writing, specifically in the speed and pressure parameters in early literacy using NeuroScript Movalyzer Software. The aim is to implement suitable research paths to support the dissemination of observation procedures and inclusive teaching practices, capable of enhancing the fluidity of writing by all students.

References

  1. Almeida I. (2013). Evaluation of the handwriting process in children with poor handwriting quality and good handwriting quality. Master’s Thesis.
  2. American Psychiatric Association et al. (2013), Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders. 5th edn Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  3. Barrientos P. (2016). Handwriting development in Spanish children with and without learning disabilities: A graphonomic approach. Journal of learning disabilities, 5(50): 552-563.
  4. Berninger V. W. et al. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3): 123-141.
  5. Brown T., Rodger S. (2008). Validity of the developmental test of visual-motor integration supplemental developmental test of visual perception. Perceptual and motor skills, 103(3): 659-678.
  6. Brown T., Unsworth C., Lyons C. (2009). Factor structure of four visual–motor instruments commonly used to evaluate school-age children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(6): 710-723.
  7. Cardoso M. H., Capellini S. A. (2016). Identification and characterization of dysgraphia in students with learning difficulties and disorders. Distúrbios da Comunicação, 28(1): 27-37.
  8. Consensus Conference (2009). Disturbi Evolutivi Specifici di Apprendimento. Raccomandazioni per la pratica clinica della dislessia, disortografia, disgrafia e discalculia. Trento: Erickson.
  9. Federe K. P., Majnemer A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4): 312-317.
  10. Giaconi C., Capellini S. A. (2015). Conoscere per includere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Giaconi C., Taddei A., Del Bianco N., Capellini S. A. (2018). Inclusive University didactics and technological devices: a case study. Education Sciences and Society, 1, testo disponibile al sito http://ojs.francoangeli.it/_ojs/index.php/ess/article/view/6248/300 28.03.2020.
  12. Graham S. et al. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual-spatial arrangements, and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29: 43-60.
  13. Graham S., Weintraub N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational psychology review, 8(1): 7-87.
  14. Kim Y. S., Al Otaiba S., Wanzek J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of third grade writing. Learining and Individual Differences, 37: 27-37.
  15. Lin Q. et al. (2015). Characterization of fine motor development: Dynamic analysis of children’s drawing movements. Human movement Science, 40:163-175.
  16. McCarney D. et al. (2013). Does poor handwriting conceal literacy potential in primary school children?. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2(60): 105-118.
  17. Meulenbroek R. G. J., Van Galen G. P. (1986). Movement analysis of repetitive writing behaviour of first, second and third grade primary school children. Advances in Psychology, 37: 71-92.
  18. Penge R. (2010). Screening, indicatori precoci e fattori di rischio per i DSA. In Simoneschi G. a cura di, Annali della pubblica istruzione. La dislessia e i disturbi specifici di apprendimento, Firenze: Periodici Le Monnie, pp. 37-50.
  19. Qiu J., et al. (2007). Brain mechanisms underlying visual perception and visual mental imagery of Chinese pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study. Brain research, 202-209.
  20. Rapporto della Commissione sulla dislessia del Consiglio Superiore di Sanità dell’Olanda (1997) riportato da D. C .M.,Gersons-Wolferbensberger e W. A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2) (testo adattato da G. Stella).
  21. Rosenblum S., Parush P. Weiss P. L. (2003). Computerized Temporal Handwriting Characteristics of Proficient and Non-Proficient Handwriters. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57:129-138.
  22. Shams L., Kim R. (2010). Crossmodal influences on visual perception. Physics of life reviews, 7(3): 269-284.
  23. Shen I. H., Lee T. Y., Chen C. L. (2012). Handwriting performance and underlying factors in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Research in developmental disabilities, 33(4):1301-1309.
  24. Simonnet D., Anquetil E., Bouillon M. (2017). Multi-criteria handwriting quality analysis with online fuzzy models. Pattern Recognition, 69: 310-324.
  25. Tsai C. L., Wilson P. H., Wu Sheng K. (2008). Role of visual–perceptual skills (non-motor) in children with developmental coordination disorder. Human movement science, 27(4): 649-664.
  26. Wardak C., Denève S., Hamed Suliann Ben (2011). Focused visual attention distorts distance perception away from the attentional locus. Neuropsychologia, 49(3): 535-545.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>