Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Special Issue 31st Annual Conference of the Società Italiana di Economia Agro-alimentare (SIEA – Italian Association of Agri-Food Economics), Venice (Italy), June 15-16, 2023

Vol. 26 No. 3 (2024)

The role of EIP-AGRI Operational Groups as a driver for innovation in viticulture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2024oa17727
Submitted
aprile 22, 2024
Published
2025-01-13

Abstract

European policies play a crucial role in helping farms and stakeholders in the agri-food sectors to proactively engage in digital and environmental transitions. Among them, the European Partnership for Innovation in Agriculture (EIP-AGRI), which was established in 2014, has proven significant in promoting sustainable production models and value chains in Europe. Operational Groups (OGs) within the Partnership provide “interactive innovation” platforms in which research institutions work with farmers, advisors, businesses, NGOs and other interest groups to co-create innovative solutions for agriculture and forestry as well as rural communities; the rationale is that when farmers and foresters are engaged in the process, the solutions are more likely to be based on their concrete reality and thus relevant.  While the benefits of the participatory, multi-actor and bottom-up approach of OGs have been widely acknowledged, little is known about the drivers and barriers influencing the process. This contribution explores their role in the wine sector, applying a mixed methods approach to analyse the perceptions of OG stakeholders from different Italian regions. Interviewees have been asked to what extent they believe the EIP-AGRI OGs serve as drivers of innovation and provide a network able to foster knowledge exchange, and what they perceive to be their barriers to innovation. By addressing this knowledge gap, this study will provide some insights and good practices to improve EIP-AGRI policies at regional, national and European levels.

References

  1. Arzeni, A., Giarè, F., Lai, M., Lasorella, M. V., Ugati, R., & Vagnozzi, A. (2023). Interactive Approach for Innovation: The Experience of the Italian EIP AGRI Operational Groups. Sustainability, 15(19), 14271. doi: 10.3390/su151914271.
  2. Bosco, S., Di Bene, C., Galli, M., Remorini, D., Massai, R., & Bonari, E. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 6(2), 15. doi: 10.4081/ija.2011.e15.
  3. Brunori, G. (2023). Towards a new generation of (agri-) food policies. Bio-based and Applied Economics. doi: 10.36253/bae-14003.
  4. Chaminade, C., & Randelli, F. (2020). The Role of Territorially Embedded Innovation Ecosystems Accelerating Sustainability Transformations: A Case Study of the Transformation to Organic Wine Production in Tuscany (Italy). Sustainability, 12(11), 4621. doi: 10.3390/su12114621.
  5. Collini, L., & Hausemer, P. (2023). Place-based pathways for the twin transition: The role of systemic change agents. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. doi: 10.1108/CR-03-2023-0060.
  6. Costa, J. M., Catarino, S., Escalona, J. M., & Comuzzo, P. (2022). Achieving a more sustainable wine supply chain – Environmental and socioeconomic issues of the industry. In Improving Sustainable Viticulture and Winemaking Practices (pp. 1-24). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85150-3.00009-8.
  7. Dressler, M. (2022). Innovation Management in Wine Business – Need to Address Front-End, Back-End, or Both?. Wine Business Journal, 5(1). doi: 10.26813/001c.31770.
  8. Dressler, M., & Paunovic, I. (2021). Converging and diverging business model innovation in regional intersectoral cooperation – exploring wine industry 4.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1625-1652. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0142.
  9. EU SCAR. (2012). Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition – a reflection paper. -- https://scar-europe.org/images/AKIS/Documents/AKIS_reflection_paper.pdf.
  10. Giarè, F., & Vagnozzi, A. (2021). Governance’s effects on innovation processes: The experience of EIP AGRI’s Operational Groups (OGs) in Italy. doi: 10.36253/rea-13206.
  11. Gibbs, G. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (2. edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  12. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
  13. ISMEA (2019). Il settore vitivinicolo alla sfida della pac post-2020: Complementarietà degli interventi tra I e II pilastro e prospettive. RRN.
  14. ISMEA (2022, ottobre 14). ISMEA presenta «L’Italia del vino: Un primato ancora incompiuto» alla Milano Wine Week. -- www.ismea.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/11940.
  15. Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems, 118, 65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003.
  16. Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
  17. Klerkx, L., Hall, A., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: Are innovation brokers the answer?. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8(5/6), 409. doi: 10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032643.
  18. Molina, N., Brunori, G., Favilli, E., Grando, S., & Proietti, P. (2021). Farmers’ Participation in Operational Groups to Foster Innovation in the Agricultural Sector: An Italian Case Study. Sustainability, 13(10), 5605. doi: 10.3390/su13105605.
  19. Parzonko, A. J., Wawrzyiak, S., & Krzyżanowska, K. (2022). The role of the innovation broker in the formation of EIP-AGRI Operational Groups. doi: 10.22004/AG.ECON.329457.
  20. Piñeiro, V., Nieto-Aleman, P., & Corbí, J. M. (2021). Collaboration through EIPAGRI Operational Groups and their role as innovation intermediaries’.
  21. Pomarici, E., Corsi, A., Mazzarino, S., & Sardone, R. (2021). The Italian Wine Sector: Evolution, Structure, Competitiveness and Future Challenges of an Enduring Leader. Italian Economic Journal, 7(2), 259-295. doi: 10.1007/s40797-021-00144-5.
  22. Pomarici, E., & Sardone, R. (2022). Is a new EU wine policy coming? The unexpected role of regulatory measures. Wine Economics and Policy, 11(2), 75-82. doi: 10.36253/wep-13189.
  23. Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, Art. 127, 103 (2021). -- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R2115.
  24. Rugani, B., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Benedetto, G., & Benetto, E. (2013). A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.036.
  25. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4E [Fourth edition]). SAGE.
  26. Soar, C. J., Sadras, V. O., & Petrie, P. R. (2008). Climate drivers of red wine quality in four contrasting Australian wine regions. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14(2), 78-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00011.x.
  27. Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Rios, I. D. I., Rivera, M., Chebach, T., & Ashkenazy, A. (2018). Local and farmers’ knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020.
  28. Tardaguila, J., Stoll, M., Gutiérrez, S., Proffitt, T., & Diago, M. P. (2021). Smart applications and digital technologies in viticulture: A review. Smart Agricultural Technology, 1, 100005. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2021.100005.
  29. Tezza, L., Vendrame, N., & Pitacco, A. (2019). Disentangling the carbon budget of a vineyard: The role of soil management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 272, 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.002.
  30. Waye, V. C., Rocca, L., Veneziani, M., Helliar, C., & Suryawathy, I. G. A. (2023). Policy, regulation, and institutional approaches to digital innovation in the wine sector: A cross-country comparison. British Food Journal, 125(5), 1854-1873. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2022-0080.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>