Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Giovani, studenti e infiniti mondi

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Giovani, studenti e infiniti mondi

Quale università alle soglie del 2020?

Submitted
novembre 17, 2019
Published
2019-12-15

Abstract

The international debate on the physiognomy of higher education started more than twenty years ago, between reforms of organizational and didactic models and profound reflections on the epistemological statutes of every single discipline. However, at the threshold of 2020, the contours of the tertiary training cycle are still blurred. Is university following the rules of markets, in an attempt to keep up with globalization and the frenetic pace of the new economy, or is the homo oeconomicus who carefully observes, with an eye to the future, the changes in knowledge production approaches that are more functional to his interests? The article, starting from the current socio-economic framework, proposes a reading of some of the possible disciplinary approaches dedicated to the planning, production and transmission of knowledge. It also touches the theme of transdisciplinarity, observing it from a constructivist perspective and also semiological, taking up Lotman's theories on the semiosphere. Finally, it suggests the potential traits of a new physiognomy of the tertiary training cycle.

References

  1. Associazione TreeLLLe (2017). Dopo la riforma: università italiana, università europea? I Quaderni, 13: 5-148.
  2. Bauman Z. (2000). La solitudine del cittadino globale. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  3. Bauman Z. (2011 a), Mazzeo R., Conversazioni sull’educazione. Trento: Erickson.
  4. Bauman Z. (2011 b). Culture in a Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Bruni L. (2007). La ferita dell’altro. Economia e relazioni umane. Trento: Il Margine.
  6. Bronfenbrenner U. (1986). Ecologia dello sviluppo umano. Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Bruner J. (2000). La cultura dell’educazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  8. D’Ascanio V. (2012). La performatività: come cambia l’orizzonte della formazione. Testo disponibile al sito: http://rivista.scuolaiad.it/n05-2012/la-performativita-come-cambia-lorizzonte-della-formazione (10/2019)
  9. European Student Union (2015). Overview on student-centred learning in higher education in Europe. Research study. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.esu-online.org/?publication=overview-on-student-centred-learning-in-higher-education-in-europe (10/2019)
  10. Lotman J., Salvestroni S. (a cura di) (1985). La semiosfera. L’asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti. Venezia: Marsilio.
  11. Lyotard J. F. (2002). La condizione postmoderna. Rapporto sul sapere. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  12. Margiotta U. (2013). La didattica laboratoriale. Trento: Erickson.
  13. McKenna B. (2014). Researchers find Student-Centered Learning approaches help underserved kids achieve. Testo disponibile al sito: https://ed.stanford.edu/news/researchers-find-student-centered-learning-approaches-help-underserved-kids-achieve (10/2019)
  14. McKenzie J. (2001). Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  15. OECD (1996). The knowledge based economy. Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf (10/2019)
  16. Montuori A. (2015). The Perils of Pernicious Polarities: Contemplating Creativity, Collaboration, and Complexity. Testo disponibile al sito: http://integralleadershipreview.com/12951-47-the-perils-of-pernicious-polarities-contemplating-creativity-collaboration-and-complexity/ (10/2019)
  17. Parlamento Europeo (2000). Consiglio Europeo di Lisbona. Conclusioni della presidenza. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_it.htm (10/2019)
  18. Parlamento Europeo (2010). Europa 2020: la strategia dell’Unione europea per la crescita e l’occupazione. Testo disponibile al sito: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ (10/2019)
  19. Porcheddu A. (2005). Zygmunt Bauman: intervista sull’educazione. Sfide pedagogiche e modernità liquida. Roma: Anicia.
  20. Santelli Beccegato L. (2004). Educazione familiare e contesto sociale. La Famiglia. Bimestrale di problemi familiari, 228: 6-11.
  21. Traini S. (2013). Le basi della semiotica. Milano: Bompiani.
  22. Ventriglia G., Murgia V. (2010). Il modello dell’Omeostasi. Sansepolcro: Aboca

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>