Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli/Articles

V. 13 N. 2 (2022): Pedagogie e Didattiche Speciali: riflessioni e pratiche per una scuola innovativa e una formazione inclusiva

A cross-case analysis of ICT courses in teacher training programmes for special needs: Technology affordances and Universal Design for Learning

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2022oa14076
Inviata
10 luglio 2022
Pubblicato
20-12-2022

Abstract

The special needs teacher is a highly qualified professional whose role is to work in collaboration with all class teachers to activate an inclusive approach for the benefit of all students and to enable individual potentialities. Technology can be of paramount importance in designing learning activities according to the principles of Universal Design for Learning in an interdisciplinary approach and with a holistic perspective of all involved actors in the teaching/learning process. In Italy, the prospective special needs teacher has the opportunity to be fully trained thanks to a comprehensive specialization course where the areas of competence of digital literacy are addressed in a specific course. The study reports a cross analysis of three editions of an Information and Communication Technology course, with a focus on the results of the last edition, whose online format was discussed starting from strengths identified in the first two face-to-face editions of the same course.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Baxter P., & Jack S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4): 544-559.
  2. Benigno V., Ferlino L., Trentin G. (2019). Tecnologie abilitanti. Un nuovo paradigma per l’inclusione. In AA.VV., Inclusione a 360°. Equità e valorizzazione dei talenti, pp. 113-126. Milano: Pearson.
  3. Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST) (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. -- http://udlguidelines.cast.org, last accessed 2021/10/21.
  4. Edyburn D.L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1): 33-41.
  5. Evmenova A. (2018). Preparing teachers to use universal design for learning to support diverse learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2): 147-171.
  6. Fedeli L. (2017). School, curriculum and technology: the what and how of their connections. Education Sciences & Society, 8(2): 42-50.
  7. Fedeli L. (2021a). Space-Time Variable in the Teaching-Learning Process: Technology Affordances for the Educational/Didactical Relation. In: The Organizing Committee the 2nd International Conference of the Journal Scuola Democratica (Ed), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the Journal Scuola Democratica “Reinventing Education”, Learning with New Technologies, Equality and Inclusion, pp. 329-338. Rome: Associazione “Per Scuola Democratica”.
  8. Fedeli L. (2021b). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of technologies for inclusion. Results from a special needs teacher training course. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica-Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 16(1): 21-36.
  9. Fedeli L. (2021c). Technology-Enhanced Learning as a Driver of Inclusive Approaches: A Cross-Case Analysis of Teacher Training Programmes. In: Ranieri M., Menichetti L., Cuomo S., Parmigiani D., Pellegrini M. (Eds), ATEE Spring Conference 2020-2021 - Book of Abstracts, pp. 171-173. Florence: Firenze University Press.
  10. Fedeli L., Pennazio V. (2019). An exploratory study on teacher training: the use and impact of technologies within a specialization course for special needs. In: Rice B.M. (Ed), Global perspectives on inclusive teacher education, pp. 58-81. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  11. Forlin C. (2010) (Ed). Teacher Education for Inclusion. Changing paradigms and innovative approaches. London, New York: Routledge.
  12. Hall T. E. Meyer A. & Rose D. H. (2012). An introduction to universal design for learning. In: Hall T. E., Meyer A. & Rose D. H. (Eds). Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom: Practical Applications, pp. 1-8. New York: Guilford Publications.
  13. Hamlin M. (2015). Technology in transformative learning environments. In: Halupa C. (Ed.), Transformative curriculum design in health sciences education, pp. 126-140. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  14. Johnson D., Johnson R., Holubec E. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  15. King-Sears M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 32: 199-201.
  16. Kress G., van Leeuwen T. (2020). Reading Images. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
  17. Laurillard D. (2009). Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3-4): 521-533.
  18. MIUR. Decree 9 August 2013, n. 706 (IT).
  19. Morra T., & Reynolds J. (2010). Universal design for learning: Application for technology-enhanced learning. Inquiry. The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 15(1): 43-51, -- https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol15/iss1/5, last accessed 2021/10/21.
  20. Passey D. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning: Rethinking the term, the concept and its theoretical background. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3): 972-986.
  21. Philips M. (2020). Multimodal representations for inclusion and success. In: Uysal, H.H. (Ed.). Political, Pedagogical and Research Insights into Early Language Education, pp. 70-81. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  22. Price M., Handley K., & Millar J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36: 879-896.
  23. Rose D. H., & Strangman N. (2007). Universal design for learning: Meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4): 381-39.
  24. Schoch K. (2019). Case study research. In: Burkholder G J., Cox K. A., Crawford L. M. & Hitchcock J. H. (Eds). Research Design and Methods. An Applied Guide for the Scholar-Practitioner, pp. 245-258. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Tomczyk Ł., Fedeli L. (2022) (Eds). Digital Literacy for Teachers. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Nature.
  26. Topping K.J. (1987). Peer Tutoring Handbook: Promoting Cooperative Learning. London: Routledge.
  27. Yin R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  28. York-Barr J., Bacharach N., Salk J. Frank J. & Beniek B. (2004). Team teaching in teacher education: General and special education faculty experiences and perspectives. Issues in Teacher Education, 13: 73-94.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...