Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli Scientifici

V. 50 N. 1 (2026)

Impatto degli stressori ambientali su cognizione e percezione del paesaggio sonoro: un'analisi delle differenze legate all'età

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ria2026oa22073
Inviata
25 febbraio 2026
Pubblicato
29-06-2026

Abstract

Gli studenti trascorrono in aula circa il 45% della loro giornata. Diventa quindi necessario che l’ambiente sia confortevole e di supporto per l’apprendimento, tramite il controllo dei quattro domini ambientali: termico, qualità dell’aria, acustico e visivo. Sebbene la letteratura di recente abbia iniziato a studiare questi domini congiuntamente, l’interazione tra qualità dell’aria e acustica rimane poco esplorata, con una significativa carenza di studi sugli studenti in età scolare. In questo studio sono stati comparati i risultati di due gruppi di studenti di età diversa: studenti universitari e alunni della Scuola Secondaria di I Grado. L’obiettivo è indagare se e come l’età degli studenti medi gli effetti degli stimoli sonori e della qualità dell’aria sulle prestazioni e sulla percezione sonora degli studenti. I risultati hanno evidenziato che l’età influisce sugli effetti delle condizioni acustiche sulle prestazioni di calcolo, ma non sulla valutazione del paesaggio sonoro, né mostra interazioni con la qualità dell’aria.

Riferimenti bibliografici (comprensivi di DOI)

  1. M. Schweiker, E. Ampatzi, M.S. Andargie, R.K. Andersen, E. Azar, V.M. Barthelmes, C. Berger, L. Bourikas, S. Carlucci, G. Chinazzo, L.P. Edappilly, M. Favero, S. Gauthier, A. Jamrozik, M. Kane, A. Mahdavi, C. Piselli, A.L. Pisello, A. Roetzel, A. Rysanek, K. Sharma, S. Zhang, Review of multi‐domain ap-proaches to indoor environmental perception and behav-iour, Build. Environ. 176 (2020) 106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106804.
  2. N.E. Klepeis, W.C. Nelson, W.R. Ott, J.P. Robinson, A.M. Tsang, P. Switzer, J. V Behar, S.C. Hern, W.H. Engelmann, The Na-tional Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 11 (2001) 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165.
  3. OECD (2019). “PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Frame-work” (OECD Publishing, Paris, France), (n.d.).
  4. XXX, Indoor soundscape, speech perception, and cognition in classrooms: A systematic review on the effects of ventila-tion-related sounds on students, Build. Environ. 236 (2023) 110194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110194.
  5. B. Du, M.C. Tandoc, M.L. Mack, J.A. Siegel, Indoor CO2 concen-trations and cognitive function: A critical review, Indoor Air 30 (2020) 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12706.
  6. G. Chinazzo, R.K. Andersen, E. Azar, V.M. Barthelmes, C. Bec-chio, L. Belussi, C. Berger, S. Carlucci, S.P. Corgnati, S. Cros-by, L. Danza, L. de Castro, M. Favero, S. Gauthier, R.T. Hell-wig, Q. Jin, J. Kim, M. Sarey Khanie, D. Khovalyg, C. Lingua, A. Luna-Navarro, A. Mahdavi, C. Miller, I. Mino-Rodriguez, I. Pigliautile, A.L. Pisello, R.F. Rupp, A.-M. Sadick, F. Salamone, M. Schweiker, M. Syndicus, G. Spigliantini, N.G. Vasquez, D. Vakalis, M. Vellei, S. Wei, Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations, Build. Environ. 226 (2022) 109719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109719.
  7. I. Balazova, G. Clausen, D.P. Wyon, The influence of exposure to multiple indoor environmental parameters on human perception, performance and motivation., in: CLIMA 2007.WellBeing Indoors: Proceedings Congress., FINVAC, Helsinky, 2007.
  8. Z. Pan, S.K. Kjaergaard, L. Mølhave, A chamber-experiment investigation of the interaction between perceptions of noise and odor in humans, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 76 (2003) 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-003-0464-3.
  9. XXX, Combined and cross-modal effects of acoustic and indoor air quality conditions on sensory and cognitive responses of university students, Build. Environ. 288 (2026) 114005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114005.
  10. G. Clausen, L. Carrick, P.O. Fanger, S.W. Kim, T. Poulsen, J.H. Rindel, A Comparative Study Of Discomfort Caused By Indoor Air Pollution, Thermal Load And Noisec, Indoor Air 3 (1993) 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00006.x.
  11. D. Connolly, J. Dockrell, B. Shield, R. Conetta, C. Mydlarz, T. Cox, The effects of classroom noise on the reading compre-hension of adolescents, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145 (2019) 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5087126.
  12. K. Loh, E. Fintor, S. Nolden, J. Fels, Children’s intentional switching of auditory selective attention in spatial and noisy acoustic environments in comparison to adults., Dev. Psy-chol. 58 (2022) 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001239.
  13. XXX, Soundscape and indoor air quality in naturally venti-lated educational environments: a multi-domain study, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Pro-ceedings, 2024: pp. 2419–2425. https://doi.org/10.3397/IN_2024_3180.
  14. American Psychological Association - Dictionary of Psycholo-gy, Cognitive abilitiy, (Accessed January 8, 2023).
  15. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 12913-1:2014 Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework, (2014).
  16. Ö. Axelsson, M.E. Nilsson, B. Berglund, A principal compo-nents model of soundscape perception, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128 (2010) 2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3493436.
  17. International Organization for Standardization, ISO - ISO/TS 12913-2:2018 - Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 2: Data col-lection and reporting requirements, (2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/75267.html (accessed July 21, 2022).
  18. S. Torresin, F. Aletta, T. Oberman, V. Vinciotti, R. Albatici, J. Kang, Measuring, representing and analysing indoor sound-scapes: A data collection campaign in residential buildings with natural and mechanical ventilation in England, Build. Environ. 243 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110726.
  19. B. West, A. Deuchars, I. Ali-MacLachlan, Office soundscape assessment: A model of acoustic environment perception in open-plan offices, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156 (2024) 2949–2959. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034230.
  20. A. Gupta, G. Torriani, S. Torresin, L. Pistore, M. Pellegatti, L. Piazza, F. Miorin, W. Pasut, A. Belleri, R. Lollini, F. Babich, Thermal comfort and perceived air quality (PAQ) using au-tomatic ceiling fans in residential buildings, Energy Build. 330 (2025) 115317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115317.
  21. F. Babich, R. Pinotti, R. Gazzin, C. Visentin, R. Lollini, From single tests to a test-chain: A comprehensive approach for evaluating the interaction between the building envelope and the IEQ, E3S Web of Conferences 523 (2024) 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452301001.
  22. J. Toftum, G. Langkilde, P.O. Fanger, New indoor environ-ment chambers and field experiment offices for research on human comfort, health and productivity at moderate energy expenditure, Energy Build. 36 (2004) 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.02.001.
  23. X. Zhang, P. Wargocki, Z. Lian, C. Thyregod, Effects of expo-sure to carbon dioxide and bioeffluents on perceived air quality, self-assessed acute health symptoms, and cognitive performance, Indoor Air 27 (2017) 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/INA.12284.
  24. A.L. Anwyl-Irvine, J. Massonnié, A. Flitton, N. Kirkham, J.K. Evershed, Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experi-ment builder, Behav. Res. Methods 52 (2020) 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
  25. M.K. Pichora-Fuller, S.E. Kramer, M.A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B.W.Y. Hornsby, L.E. Humes, U. Lemke, T. Lunner, M. Mat-then, C.L. Mackersie, G. Naylor, N.A. Phillips, M. Richter, M. Rudner, M.S. Sommers, K.L. Tremblay, A. Wingfield, Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The framework for under-standing effortful listening (FUEL), in: Ear Hear., Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2016: pp. 5S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
  26. XXX, The effect of ventilation-related sound stimuli on 11–14 years students’ cognition and soundscape assessments, Applied Acoustics 245 (2026) 111206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.111206.
  27. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (2025).
  28. D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, S. Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw. 67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
  29. G.N. Wilkinson, C.E. Rogers, Symbolic Description of Factori-al Models for Analysis of Variance, 1973. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346786.
  30. F. Aletta, Ö. Axelsson, H. Xie, Soundscape assessment: To-wards a validated translation of perceptual attributes in dif-ferent languages Impact and outreach of soundscape studies View project Urban Design for Sustainable Built Environ-ment View project, n.d. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343892927.
  31. International Organization for Standardization, ISO - ISO/TS 12913-3:2019 - Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 3: Data analysis, (2019).
  32. A. Mitchell, F. Aletta, J. Kang, How to analyse and repre-sent quantitative soundscape data, JASA Express Lett. 2 (2022) 037201. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009794.
  33. B. Meinhardt‐Injac, S. Schlittmeier, M. Klatte, A. Otto, M. Persike, M. Imhof, Auditory Distraction by Meaningless Ir-relevant Speech: A Developmental Study, Appl. Cogn. Psy-chol. 29 (2015) 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3098.
  34. M. Klatte, K. Bergström, T. Lachmann, Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive per-formance in children, Front. Psychol. 4 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578.
  35. I. Friso-van den Bos, E. van de Weijer-Bergsma, Classroom versus individual working memory assessment: predicting academic achievement and the role of attention and re-sponse inhibition, Memory 28 (2020) 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1682170.
  36. P. Peng, J. Namkung, M. Barnes, C. Sun, A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics., J. Educ. Psychol. 108 (2016) 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079.
  37. A. Alvar, A.L. Francis, Effects of background noise on auto-nomic arousal (skin conductance level), JASA Express Lett. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0024272.
  38. Y. Lu, K.J. Jaquess, B.D. Hatfield, C. Zhou, H. Li, Valence and arousal of emotional stimuli impact cognitive-motor perfor-mance in an oddball task, Biol. Psychol. 125 (2017) 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.010.
  39. J. Posner, J.A. Russell, B.S. Peterson, The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology, Dev. Psycho-pathol. 17 (n.d.) 715–734. https://doi.org/10.10170S0954579405050340.
  40. K.H. Teigen, Yerkes-Dodson: A Law for all Seasons, Theory Psychol. 4 (1994) 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394044004.
  41. R.M. Yerkes, J.D. Dodson, The relation of strength of stimu-lus to rapidity of habit-formation, Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18 (1908) 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/CNE.920180503.
  42. H.K. Cal, F. Aletta, J. Kang, P. Clarke, Student perception of school soundscapes and wellbeing: A mixed methods exami-nation of natural and musical sounds, Build. Environ. 277 (2025) 112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112946.
  43. M.M. HAINES, S.A. STANSFELD, R.F.S. JOB, B. BERGLUND, J. HEAD, Chronic aircraft noise exposure, stress responses, mental health and cognitive performance in school children, Psychol. Med. 31 (2001) 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701003282.
  44. C. Clark, R. Crombie, J. Head, I. Van Kamp, E. Van Kempen, S.A.A. Stansfeld, Does traffic-related air pollution explain associations of aircraft and road traffic noise exposure on children’s health and cognition? A secondary analysis of the United Kingdom sample from the RANCH project, Am. J. Epi-demiol. 176 (2012) 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws012.
  45. S.A.A. Stansfeld, B. Berglund, C. Clark, I. Lopez-Barrio, P. Fischer, E. Öhrström, M.M.M. Haines, J. Head, S. Hygge, I. Van Kamp, I. Van Kamp, B.F.F. Berry, Aircraft and road traf-fic noise and children’s cognition and health: A cross-national study, Lancet 365 (2005) 1942–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66660-3.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...