Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

No. 2 (2025)

A perspective on the “Progetto di Vita” of students with SEN: Results of a field study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2025oa21068
Submitted
settembre 21, 2025
Published
2025-12-11

Abstract

This contribution aims to propose an design perspective to ensure the full implementation of the Life Project for students with Special Educational Needs (SEN), in line with the recent regulatory provisions introduced by Legislative Decree No. 62/2024. In this context, the contribution aims to illustrate field research using the focus group methodology on a sample of 23 components, which sought to analyse the issues inherent in the Life Project and propose actions to overcome the fragmentation of traditionally adopted interventions, outlining a systemic, integrated and multidimensional approach that values self-determination and active participation. The key points that emerged from the qualitative survey are illustrated: from the multidimensional assessment of the functioning profile, to educational co-design with all the actors involved, to the monitoring and periodic review of the pathway. In addition, a number of innovative operational actions are presented, such as the introduction of Life Project tutors, self-determination workshops and school-to-work transition plans, which make the project a transformative tool in educational, health and social contexts. 

References

  1. Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  2. Booth T., & Ainscow M. (2008). Index for Inclusion. CSIE.
  3. Canevaro A. (2013). Pedagogia speciale. La qualità dell’integrazione. Erickson.
  4. Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. (2018). Research metods in education. Routledge.
  5. Cottini L. (2019). Didattica speciale e inclusione scolastica. Carocci.
  6. Decreto Legislativo n. 62/2024. Disposizioni in materia di disabilità. Gazzetta Ufficiale.
  7. Demetrio D. (1996). L’intervista autobiografica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Dettori G.F., Carboni F. (2024). A scuola di emozioni, empatia e sentimenti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Friese S. (2019). Qualitative data analisys with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publication.
  10. Friso V. Caldin R. (2022). Orientamento e accompagnamento per un autentico Progetto di vita. Studium Educationis. XXIII(1): 48-56. Doi. 10.7346/SE-012022-05.
  11. Giaconi C., Aparecida Capellini S. (2015). Conoscere per includere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Gupta A. (2024). Qualitative methods and data analysis using ATLAS.ti: a comprensive research’s manual. Springer.
  13. Lascioli A., Pasqualotto L. (2021), Il piano educativo individualizzato su base ICF. Strumenti e prospettive per la scuola. Carocci Faber.
  14. Morgan D.L. (2017). Focus Group as Qualitative Research. SAGE Pubblication.
  15. Mura A. (2018). Orientamento formativo e Progetto di Vita. Narrazioni e itinerari didattico-educativi. UNICA IRIS https://iris.unica.it/retrieve/e2f56ed7-2cf0-3eaf-e053-3a05fe0a5d97/347.8%20Mura%20PER%20LA%20STAMPA.pdf.
  16. Kolb D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
  17. Krueger R. A., & Casey M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  18. Morgan D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  19. WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization.
  20. ONU (2006). Convenzione sui Diritti delle Persone con Disabilità. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/.
  21. Schalock R. L., & Verdugo M. A. (2002). Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners. American Association on Mental Retardation.
  22. Shogren K. A., et al. (2015). Self-Determination Inventory. University of Kansas.
  23. Sparrow S. S., Cicchetti D. V., & Balla D. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Pearson.
  24. Schreier M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
  25. Tobon S & Luna Nemecio J. (2020). Proposal for a new talent concept based on socioformation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53: 21-33. Doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1725885.
  26. Trisciuzzi M. (2022). Il tutor del progetto di vita. Regia educativa e inclusione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  27. Trivellato P. (2015). La rete che sostiene. Strumenti per la valutazione del supporto sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  28. Van Brakel W. H., et al. (2006). Participation Scale: Measuring participation restrictions. Leprosy Review.