Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2016): ESS - Alignment, attunement, co-activity, co-regulation. Convergent trajectories?

Motor technique and didactics: a possible alliance from an educational point of view

Submitted
December 15, 2016
Published
2017-01-09

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive study is to reflect on the development of physical education in Italian schools by delineating the key milestones in the development of motor and physical activities in nursery and primary schools with reference to the national guidelines provided by the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research.

These reflections focus on the potentiality of corporeality for a personalized didactics, with the aim of reconsidering the importance of body and movement as privileged areas for the education of the person, which finds its roots in the adoption of a didactics of the body that reinstates the role of physical-motor sciences within the educational processes, thus creating the possibility for teaching movement and teaching through movement.  

References

  1. Arnold P. J. (1991). The Preeminence of Skill as an Educational Value in the Movement Curriculum. Quest 43 (1): 66–77.
  2. Bailey R., Morley R., and Dismore H. (2009). Talent Development in Physical Education: A National Survey of Policy and Practice in England. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 14 (1): 59–72.
  3. Biccardi T., (2001). La comunicazione corporea. In Sibilio M., Il laboratorio come percorso formativo. Napoli: Esselibri.
  4. Brown T. (2013). A Vision Lost? (Re)articulating an Arnoldian Conception of Education ‘in’ Movement in Physical Education. Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 22–37.
  5. Calidoni P. (2000). Didattica come sapere professionale. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola.
  6. Calvesi A. and Tonetti A. (1992). L’attività motoria e l’educazione. Milano: Principato.
  7. Carraro A. and Bertollo M. (2005). Le Scienze motorie e sportive nella scuola primaria. Padova: Cleup.
  8. Carraro A. and Lanza M. (2004). Insegnare/Apprendere in Educazione Fisica: problemi e prospettive. Roma: Armando.
  9. Casolo F. (2002). Lineamenti di teoria e metodologia del movimento umano. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  10. Casolo F. (2011). Didattica delle attività motorie per l’età evolutiva. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  11. Cereda F. (2013). Teoria, tecnica e didattica del fitness. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  12. Cereda F. (2015). Attività motoria, sport e processi educativi. Tra implicazioni didattiche e aspetti pedagogici. Pedagogia e Vita (73), pp. 260-272.
  13. Cilia G., Ceciliani A., Dugnani S. and Monti V. (1996). L’educazione fisica. Padova: Piccin.
  14. Ericsson I., and Cederberg M. (2015). Physical Activity and School Performance: A Survey Among Students not Qualified for Upper Secondary School. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 20 (1): 45–66.
  15. Faigenbaum A., McFarland J., Johnson L., Kang J., Bloom J., Ratamess N., and Hoffman J. (2007) Preliminary evaluation of an afterschool resistance training program. PerceptMotSkills 104: 407–415.
  16. Faigenbaum A.D., Kraemer W.J., Blimkie C.J.R., Jeffreys I., Micheli L.J., Nitka M., and Rowland T.W. (2009). Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res 23(5): S60–S79.
  17. Gamelli I. (2004). Pedagogia ed educazione motoria. Milano: Guerini Reprint.
  18. Kirk D. 2010. Physical Education Futures. London: Routledge.
  19. Le Boulch J. (1979). Verso una scienza del movimento umano. Roma: Armando.
  20. Lipoma M. (a cura di) (2014). Le ontologie pedagogiche dell’educazione motoria. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  21. Lloyd R.S., Faigenbaum A.D., Stone M.H., et al. (2014). Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med, 48: 498–505.
  22. Meinel K. (1984). Teoria del movimento. Roma: Società Stampa Sportiva.
  23. Mitchell S. and Fisette J. (2016). The Essentials of Teaching Physical Education. Champaign (IL, USA): Humank Kinetics.
  24. Nyberg G., and H. Larsson. (2014). Exploring ‘What’ to Learn in Physical Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 19 (2): 123–135.
  25. Palumbo C. (2015). L’educazione motoria nella scuola primaria italiana. In Sibilio M., D’Elia F. Didattica in movimento. Brescia: La Scuola. Pag.159.
  26. Quennerstedt, M. (2013). Practical Epistemologies in Physical Education Practice. Sport, Education and Society 18 (3): 311–333.
  27. Redelius K., Fagrell B., and Larsson H. (2009). Symbolic Capital in Physical Education and Health. To Do, To Be Or To Know? That is the Gendered Question. Sport, Education and Society 13 (4): 381–398.
  28. Rikard L. G. and Banville D. (2006). High school student attitudes about physical education, Sport, Education and Society, 11:4, 385-400.
  29. Sibilio M. (2015)a. Il corpo educativo. In Sibilio M., L'agire educativo pag.108-119 Brescia: La Scuola.
  30. Sibilio M. (2015)b. La funzione orientativa della didattica semplessa. Pedagogia Oggi. Vol. 1/2015. Pag. 327-334.
  31. Sibilio M., (2008). Il corpo e il movimento, Cuen: Napoli. Pag. 155.
  32. Sotgiu P. and Pellegrini F. (1989). Attività motorie e processo educativo. Roma: Società Stampa Sportiva.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...