Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Evaluation, feedback, equity: a challenge in education

Validating of a hetero- and self-evaluation tool for teaching organization competence at school

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12400
Submitted
agosto 31, 2021
Published
2021-12-21

Abstract

This paper presents a tool for hetero-self-evaluation for teaching organization competences, which we used to assess forecasting and developing skills of the teaching activity, of regulation and reflection on the practice in the classroom, in teachers in formation. Observing and decision making, thinking about what, why and how to teach, authentically planning and evaluating, are complex and crucial operations to create the organizational and methodological humus, that must characterize the professional development of the teacher, also with regard to communicative and reflective skills (Perrenoud, 2012; Conole, 2014; Panke, 2019). We have built a rating scale, with the actions to be observed, starting from some recent frameworks of the teacher’s professional profile and skills. We have performed the validation process used a sample of trainees, which have been preparing to become primary and children’s school teachers (n = 681); the results show good metrological characteristics of the instrument.

References

  1. Bonaiuti G., Calvani A., Ranieri M. (2016). Fondamenti di didattica. Teoria e prassi dei dispositivi formativi. Roma: Carocci (2a ed.).
  2. Brown A.H., Green T.D. (2019). The Essentials of Instructional Design: Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Bru M., Altet M., Blanchard-Laville C. (2004). À la recherche des processus caractéristiques des pratiques enseignantes dans leurs rapports aux apprentissages. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 148: 75-87. DOI: 10.3406/dsedu.2007.1101.
  4. Cheng Y.C., Tsui K.T. (1998). Research on Total Teacher Effectiveness: Conception Strategies. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(1): 39-47. DOI: 10.1108/09513549810195893.
  5. Coggi C. (2014). Verso un’università delle competenze. In Notti A.M., a cura di, A scuola di valutazione (pp. 119-142). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  6. Conole G. (2014). Designing for Learning in an Open World. London: Springer.
  7. Damiano E. (2004). L’insegnante. Identificazione di una professione. Brescia: La Scuola.
  8. Damiano E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Danielson C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.
  10. Fabbri L. (2017). Apprendere a insegnare. In Domenici G., a cura di, La formazione iniziale e in servizio degli insegnanti (pp. 326-335). Roma: Armando.
  11. Fabbri L., Melacarne C. (2015). Apprendere a scuola. Metodologie attive di sviluppo e dispositivi riflessivi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Fabbri L., Romano A. (2018). Metodi per l’apprendimento trasformativo. Casi, modelli, teorie. Roma: Carocci.
  13. Franceschini G. (2012). Insegnanti consapevoli. Saperi e competenze per i docenti di scuola dell’infanzia e di scuola primaria. Bologna: CLUEB.
  14. Gardner H. (1991). The Unschooled Mind. How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  15. Gherardi V. (2010). La didattica nella scuola di base. Professionalità e strategie nella costruzione dei saperi. Roma: Carocci.
  16. Grion V. (2008). Insegnanti e formazione: realtà e prospettive. Roma: Carocci.
  17. Halpern D.F. (2003). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Jonassen D.H. (2004). Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Lipman M. (2003). Thinking in Education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Lucisano P., Salerni A., Sposetti P., a cura di (2013). Didattica e conoscenza. Riflessioni e proposte sull’apprendere e l’insegnare. Roma: Carocci.
  21. Mezirow J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  22. Oser F.K., Baeriswyl F.J. (2001). Choreographies of Teaching: Bridging Instruction to Learning. In Richardson V. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed.). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
  23. Panke S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1: 281-306. DOI: 10.1515/edu-2019-0022.
  24. Perla L. (2011). L’eccellenza in cattedra. Dal saper insegnare alla conoscenza dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  25. Perrenoud Ph. (1996). Former des enseignants professionnels. Quelles stratégies? Quelles compétences?. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  26. Perrenoud Ph. (2001). Développer la pratique réflexive dans le métier d’enseignant. Paris: ÉSF - Édition Social Française.
  27. Perrenoud Ph. (2012). L’organisation du travail, clé de toute pédagogie différenciée. Paris: ÉSF - Édition Social Française.
  28. Richey R.C., Klein J.D., Tracey M.W. (2010). The Instructional Design Knowledge Base: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  29. Rothwell W.J. (2016). Mastering the Instructional Design Process: A Systematic Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  30. Torre E.M., Ricchiardi P. (2007). Le competenze dell’insegnante. Trento: Erickson.
  31. Walker P.E. (2003). Active Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking. Journal of Athletic Training, 38(3): 263-267.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...