Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Evaluation, feedback, equity: a challenge in education

Peer review, feedback and new models of participatory assessment in higher education: An experimention at the Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12477
Submitted
September 7, 2021
Published
2021-12-21

Abstract

Among the strategies used to promote participatory and learner-centred forms of assessment that promote students’ assessment literacy we include feedback and peer assessment. In the light of this framework, peer review strategies were tested in a Primary Education degree course. The results show the effectiveness of peer review activities of authentic tasks in developing students’ planning and evaluation skills, with an improvement in their performance and products. The results also showed the support of the peer review process in explicating students' implicit knowledge. The research also showed the importance of adapting university courses remotely through the planning of the learning environment and the use of online technologies/resources and the role of documentation in the development of design, evaluation and reflective skills of university students.

References

  1. Ajjawi R., Boud D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2): 252-265. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
  2. Beach A.L., Sorcinelli D.M., Austin A.E. and Rivard J.K. (2016). Faculty Development in the Age of Evidence: Current Practices, Future Imperatives. Sterlin: Stylus Pub.
  3. Bell A., Mladenovic R. and Price M. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplar. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7): 769-788. DOI: 10.1080/ 02602938.2012.714738.
  4. Boud D., Falchikov N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. London: Routledge.
  5. Boud D., Soler R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3): 400-413. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133.
  6. Brown E., Glover C. (2006). Evaluating Written Feedback. In C. Bryan, K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 81-91). London: Routledge.
  7. Damiano E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Evans C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1): 70-12. DOI: 10.3102/0034654312474350.
  9. Felisatti E., Serbati A. (Eds.) (2017). Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Giannandrea L. (2009). Valutazione come formazione: percorsi e riflessioni sulla valutazione scolastica. Macerata: EUM.
  11. Grion V., Serbati A. (2017). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Nuove prospettive e pratiche di valutazione all’università. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
  12. Grion V., Serbati A., Felisatti E. and Li L. (2019). Peer feedback and technology-enhanced assessment as critical issues to foster student learning. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 9-14. DOI: 10.7346/SIRD-1S2019-P9.
  13. Grion V., Serbati A., Tino C. and Nicol D. (2017). Ripensare la teoria della valutazione e dell’apprendimento all’università: un modello per implementare pratiche di peer review. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 209-226.
  14. Grion V., Tino C. (2018). Verso una “valutazione sostenibile” all’università: percezioni di efficacia dei processi di dare e ricevere feedback fra pari, Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 31: 38-55. DOI: 10.19241/lll.v14i31.104.
  15. Grion V., Serbati A. (2019). Valutazione sostenibile e feedback nei contesti universitari. Prospettive emergenti, ricerche e pratiche. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  16. Grion V., Aquario D. and Restiglian E. (2019). Valutare nella scuola e nei contesti educativi. Padova: CLEUP.
  17. Harland T., Wald N. and Randhawa H. (2017). Student peer review: Enhancing formative feedback with a rebuttal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5): 801-811. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1194368.
  18. Hattie J., Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1): 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487.
  19. Li L., Grion V. (2019). The power of giving feedback and receiving feedback in peer assessment. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 11(2): 1-17.
  20. Lotti A., Lampugnani P. (Eds) (2020). Faculty Development e valorizzazione delle competenze didattiche dei docenti nelle università italiane. Genova: GUP.
  21. Nicol D., Thomson A. and Breslin C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1): 102-122. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
  22. Nicol D., Serbati A. and Tracchi M. (2019). Competence development and portfolios: Promoting reflection through peer review. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 11(2): 1-13.
  23. O’Sullivan P.S., Irby D.M. (2011). Reframing research on faculty development. Academic Medicine, 86: 421-428. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058.
  24. Orsmond P., Merry S. and Reiling K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3): 239-250. DOI: 10.1080/0260293960210304.
  25. Perla L. (Eds.) (2019). Valutare per valorizzare. La documentazione per il miglioramento di scuola, insegnanti, studenti. Brescia: Morcelliana.
  26. Perla L. (2020). Lo sviluppo professionale del docente Universitario. Vision, organizzazione e co-progettazione nell’esperienza TLL dell’Università di Bari. Scuola democratica, 3: 561-572. DOI: 10.12828/99904.
  27. Perla L., Agrati L.S. and Vinci V. (2019). The ‘sophisticated’ knowledge of e-teacher. Re-shape digital resources for online courses. In D. Burgos et. al. (Eds.), Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (pp. 3-17). Springer.
  28. Perla L., Scarinci A. and Amati I. (2021). Metamorphosis of space into digital scholarship. A research on hybrid mediation in a university context. In L.S. Agrati et al. (Eds.). Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education, CCIS, 1344: 226-239.
  29. Perla L., Vinci V. (2021). Didattica, riconoscimento professionale e innovazione in Università. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  30. Restiglian E., Grion V. (2019). Valutazione e feedback fra pari nella scuola: uno stu-dio di caso nell’ambito del progetto GRiFoVA. Italian Journal of Educational Research, XII, Special Issue, 195-221. DOI 10.7346/SIRD-1S2019-P195.
  31. Richards L., Morse J.M. (2009). Fare ricerca qualitativa. Prima guida (tr. it.). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  32. Rivoltella P.C. (2017). Media Education. Idea, metodo, ricerca. Brescia: Morcelliana.
  33. Sambell K. (2011). Rethinking feedback in higher education: an assessment for learning perspective. Bristol: ESCalate.
  34. Sambell K., McDowell L. and Montgomery C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. Routledge.
  35. Serbati A., Grion V. (2019). IMPROVe: Six research-based principles to realise peer assessment in educational contexts. Form@re, 19(3): 89-105. DOI: 10.13128/form-7707.
  36. Serbati A., Grion V. and Fanti M. (2019). Caratteristiche del peer feedback e giudizio valutativo in un corso universitario blended. Italian Journal of Educational Research, Special Issue, 115-137. DOI: 10.7346/SIRD-1S2019-P115.
  37. Sorcinelli M.D. (2007). Faculty development: The challenge going forward. Peer Review, 9(4): 4-8.
  38. Steinert Y. (2014). Faculty Development in the Health Professions. A Focus on Research and Practice. Cham: Springer.
  39. Tai J., Ajjawi R., Boud D., Dawson P. and Panadero E. (2017). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76: 467-481. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
  40. Tonelli D., Grion V. and Serbati A. (2018). L’efficace interazione fra valutazione e tecnologie: evidenze da una rassegna sistematica della letteratura. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3): 6-23. DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/1028.
  41. Vinci V. (2021). La documentazione per la valutazione. Nuova Secondaria, 9: 445-457.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...