Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2016): ESS - Alignment, attunement, co-activity, co-regulation. Convergent trajectories?

Integrated school-community projects to promote motor activity through possible alignment with professionals

Submitted
dicembre 23, 2016
Published
2017-01-09

Abstract

The physical education in primary school try to pursue a twofold purpose: on the one hand it enrich the motor luggage learners, proposing qualitatively effective motor activities; in the other hand, it try to train teachers in extra-curricular perspective. The proposed projects, in recent years, emphasized the indissoluble marriage between motor and pedagogy. The school, in fact, according to the Ministerial Directions, actively proposes a structure of ludic-motor-sporting nature initiatives aimed at spreading a culture of movement, in a teaching and educational perspective. In this regard, projects born from the signing of memoranda of understanding between MIUR and CONI want to promote a culture of movement in children, which is essential for a complete student training. The project activities promoted tend to introduce a new cultural paradigm, in which it urged the teachers' skills and educational existing resources, with the continued collaboration between school and territory.

References

  1. Sibilio M., Aiello P., (2010), The teaching research focused on the movement: heuristic approaches and elements of complexity, Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 29, 4: 52-56.
  2. Borgogni A. (2012). Tra significati e paradossi: la relazione tra educatori. Comunicazione nel convegno “Alfabetizzazione Motoria. Corso nazionale di aggiornamento Supervisori”, Ostia 14-16/12/2012.
  3. Borgogni A., Digennaro S., Manzo S., Vannini E. (2010). Towards Sustainable Didactics. Exercise and Quality of Life, Volume 2/2010: 43-49.
  4. Sibilio, M., D’Elia, F. (2015). Professionalità in ambito motorio e sportivo. In Cunti, A., a cura di (2015). Corpi in formazione. Voci Pedagogiche. Milano: Franco Angeli
  5. Colella D. (2014). Physical education in primary school in Italy. The Sbam! program for the promotion of physically active lifestyles. In Scheuer C., Antala B., Holzweg M. (Eds.), Physical Education: Quality in management and teaching. Berlino: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, pp. 121-134.
  6. CONI (2010), Alfabetizzazione motoria nella scuola primaria Indicazioni per l’organizzazione dell’attività̀ motoria nella scuola primaria, Presentazione ai Supervisori, Università̀ di Verona, Facoltà̀ di Scienze Motorie, 22/23/24 gennaio 2010
  7. CONI (2013), Progetto Primaria, Aggiornamento modello progettuale ed organizzativo in base agli esiti della sperimentazione.
  8. Digennaro S., Borgogni A. (2015). La razionalità limitata delle scelte educative. Encyclopaideia XIX (41): 21-36.
  9. Eichberg H. (2010). Bodily democracy. Towards a philosophy of sport for all. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Routledge.
  10. Frabboni F., a cura di (1988). Un’educazione possibile. Il sistema formativo tra policentrismo e specialismo. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  11. Frabboni F., Guerra L., a cura di (1991). La città educativa. Verso un sistema formativo integrato. Bologna: Cappelli.
  12. Lipsky, M. (1969). Toward a theory of street-level bureaucracy. Madison (WI): Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
  13. Meinel K.1991 Teoria del movimento: Abbozzo di una teoria della motricità sportiva sotto l’aspetto pedagogico. Roma: Società Stampa Sportiva
  14. MIUR nota prot.n. 6263 del 3 novembre 2014 “Progetto nazionale Sport di Classe per la scuola primaria - anno scolastico 2014/2015”.
  15. Sibilio, M,(2001). Il corpo e il movimento . Napoli:Cuen , p.176
  16. Simovska V., McNamara P. M. (2015). Schools for Health and Sustainability. Theory, Research and Practice. Londra: Springer.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...