Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2022): Young people, institutions and territories

Crying Jellyfish. Capicua at the Crossroads of Artistic Labour and Critical Pedagogies during the Pandemic

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2022oa13576
Submitted
marzo 31, 2022
Published
2022-06-14

Abstract

Our goal is to bring the artistic and scientific perspective into dialogue, linking them to a form of critical pedagogy. Our spokesperson is the researcher and rapper Ana Matos Fernandes, also known as Capicua. Through her writings, we were able to explain and understand the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on artistic, cultural and creative work and how those moments could make way to a form of critic0al pedagogy. Moreover, we propose to overcome the conventional barriers between the social sciences, which tend to be perceived as being the fruit of an arbitrary nature and a product of scholastic reproduction. We also argue that one of the main errors of the social sciences today concerns the uncontrolled relationship maintained by the researcher with the object of study, ignoring everything that the vision of the object gives to the researcher within the social space and within the scientific field itself.

References

  1. Atalan A. (2020). Is the lockdown important to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic? Effects on psychology, environment and economy-perspective. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 56: 38-42.
  2. Beck U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.
  3. Bennett A. (2018). Conceptualising the relationship between youth, music and DIY careers: A critical overview. Cultural Sociology, 12(2): 140-155.
  4. Bennett A. and Guerra P. (2018). DIY cultures and underground music scenes. London: Routledge.
  5. Bourdieu P. (1993). La misère du monde. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
  6. Bourdieu P.; Wacquant, L. (1992). Réponses. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
  7. Capicua (2020a). Algumas reflexões sobre isto de ser músico em tempo de pandemia (pequeno testemunho). In: Leão T., editor, Cadernos da Pandemia do Instituto de Sociologia da Universidade do Porto (pp. 80-82). Porto: Instituto de Sociologia da Universidade do Porto.
  8. Capicua (2020b). Realidade virtual. Visão. Available at: https://visao.sapo.pt/opiniao/cronicas/2020-09-23-realidade-virtual.
  9. Capicua (2021a). Confinamento (e o apaziguador transe do quotidiano). Visão. Available at: https://visao.sapo.pt/opiniao/cronicas/2021-03-10-confinamento-e-o-apaziguador-transe-do-quotidiano.
  10. Comunian R. and England L. (2020). Creative and cultural work without filters: COVID-19 and exposed precarity in the creative economy. Cultural Trends, 29(2): 112-128.
  11. Cook J., Threadgold S., Farrugia D. and Coffrey D. (2021). Youth, precarious work and the Pandemic. YOUNG, 29(4): 331-348.
  12. Cordova R. (2016). DIY Punk as Education: From Mis-education to Educative Healing. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  13. Duncombe S., editor (2002). Cultural Resistance Reader. New York: Verso.
  14. Freire P. (2017). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.
  15. Giroux H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder: Paradigm.
  16. Guerra P. (2015). Capicua e Bourdieu: Entre o rap e a Sociologia. Projeto Pedagógico da Unidade Curricular Correntes Atuais da Sociologia I. Porto: Universidade do Porto.
  17. Guerra P. (2020a). Cidade, pedagogia e rap. Quaestio – Revista de Estudos em Educação, 22(2): 431-453.
  18. Guerra P. (2020b). The song is still a ‘weapon’: The Portuguese identity in times of crisis. YOUNG, 28(1): 14-31.
  19. Guerra P. (2021). So close yet so far: DIY cultures in Portugal and Brazil. Cultural Trends, 30(2): 122-138.
  20. Guerra P. and Sousa S. (2021). Ultimate bias. Memorabilia, K-pop and fandom identities. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios. Special issue, October. DOI: 10.15847/cct.23948.
  21. Guerra P., Oliveira A. and Sousa S. (2021). Um Requiem pelas músicas que perdemos. O Público e o Privado, 38: 171-198.
  22. Guerra P. and Zanko P. (2019). Educational contexts of cultural resistance in Poland and Portugal. An introduction to research. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 64(3): 155-172.
  23. Harrison, A. (2019). The Lazarus effect: How the music industry saved itself. New Statesman, January. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/2019/01/is-the-music-industry-dead.
  24. Howard F., Bennett A., Green B., Guerra P., Sousa S. and Sofija E. (2021). ‘It’s turned me from a professional to a “bedroom DJ” once again’: COVID-19 and new forms of inequality for young music-makers. YOUNG, 29(4): 417-432.
  25. Judt T. (2010). Ill Fares the Land. London: Penguin Press.
  26. Kennedy M. (2020). “If the rise of the TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it’s that teenage girls rule the internet right now”: TikTok celebrity, girls and the coronavirus crisis. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6): 1069-1076.
  27. Lehman E.T. (2020). “Washing hands, reaching out”: Popular music, digital leisure and touch during the COVID-19 pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2): 273-279.
  28. McRobbie A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Chichester: Wiley.
  29. Miles R. (2021). The show must go online. Available at: https://robmyles.co.uk/theshowmustgoonline.
  30. Mouffe C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London-New York: Verso Books.
  31. Mulder J. (2015). Live sound and the disappearing digital. In: Cresswell A.J. and Bennett R.J., editors, The digital evolution of live music. London: Elsevier.
  32. Newton J. and Ponting C. (2013). Eliciting young people’s views on wellbeing through contemporary science debates in Wales. Child Indicators Research, 6(1): 71-95.
  33. O’Neill S.A. (2014). Mind the gap: Transforming music engagement through learner-centred informal music learning. The Recorder: Journal of the Ontario Music Educator’s Association, 56(2): 18-22.
  34. Parmar P. et al, editors (2014). Rebel Music: Resistance through Hip Hop and Punk. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  35. Pugh A.J. (2021). What does job insecurity do? Talking to, and learning from, Arne Kalleberg’s precarious lives: Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies. Contemporary Sociology, 50(2): 101-104.
  36. Ragin C. (2004). Constructing social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  37. Rancière J. (2010). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: A&C Black.
  38. Santos T.T. and Guerra P. (2017). From Punk Ethics to the Pedagogy of the Bad Kids: Core values and Social Liberation. In: Smith G.D., Dines M. and Parkinson T., editors, Punk Pedagogies: Music, culture and learning. London: Routledge.
  39. Silva A., Guerra P. and Santos H. (2018). When art meets crisis: The Portuguese story and beyond. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 86: 27-43.
  40. Sobande F. (2020). “We’re all in this together”: Commodified notions of connection, care and community in brand responses to COVID-19. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6): 1033-1037.
  41. Strong C. and Cannizzo F. (2020). Understanding challenges to the Victorian music industry during COVID-19. Melbourne: RMIT University.
  42. White, S. (2015). Relational wellbeing: A theoretical and operational approach. Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing, 43: 1-31.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)