Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Evaluation, feedback, equity: a challenge in education

Towards Assessment as Learning: Findings from online courses for secondary school teachers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12877
Submitted
novembre 6, 2021
Published
2021-12-21

Abstract

Today's school has to deal with several critical issues related to assessment, such as the excessive focus on grades and the lack of a shared understanding of assessment methods and aims. Assessment becomes formative when the evidence gathered is used to adapt teaching practice to pupils' learning needs. Teachers should move towards Assessment as Learning, characterised by appropriate tasks, development of evaluative competence, and involvement of students in feedback processes. This contribution presents two online research-training courses on assessment in secondary schools. They involved 240 secondary school teachers and consisted of a training and a workshop part. Courses were mainly based on teacher involvement, allowing for recursive feedback processes. We analysed data from an entry questionnaire, a One Minute Paper submitted during the course, and the workshop. The data analysis highlights the main difficulties related to assessment, suggestions, and reflections of the participants. We noticed the importance of workshop and group work to reflect on the transformation of practices. Finally, the interaction with the teachers was indeed valuable in understanding the sustainability of the proposal and refining it.

References

  1. Angelo T.A., Cross K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques (2nd ed). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  2. Berthoz A. (2009). La Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  3. Black P., Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1): 7-74. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102.
  4. Brousseau G. (1986). Fondement et Méthodes de la Didactique des Mathématiques. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 7(2): 33-115.
  5. Bryant L.C., Vincent R., Shaqlaih A. and Moss G. (2013). Behaviorism and behavioral learning theory. In: Irby B.J., Brown G., Lara-Alecio R. and Jackson S., eds., The handbook of educational theories (pp. 91-103). IAP Information Age Publishing.
  6. Burke K. (2010). Balanced assessment: From formative to summative. Solution Tree Press.
  7. Carless D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6): 963-976.
  8. Carless D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5): 705-714. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108.
  9. Duffy T.M., Jonassen D.H. (2013). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Routledge.
  10. Fishman B., Dede C. (2016). Teaching and technology: New tools for new times. In: Gitomer D.H. and Bell C.A., eds., Handbook of Research on Teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  11. Glatthorn A.A. (1999). Performance standards and authentic learning. Larchmont, NY: Eye of education.
  12. Hung W. (2019). Problem design in PBL. In: Moallem M., Hung W. and Dabbagh N. eds., The Wiley handbook of Problem-based learning (pp. 249-272). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  13. Jonassen D.H. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  14. Jonassen D.H. (Ed.). (2017). Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Routledge.
  15. Kolmos A., Du X. Holgaard J.E. and Jensen L.P. (2008). Facilitation in a PBL environment. UCPBL UNESCO Chair in Problem Based Learning.
  16. Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
  17. Nicol D., McFarlane-Dick D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199-218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
  18. Pellerey M. (2004). Le competenze individuali e il portfolio. Roma: La Nuova Italia.
  19. Raccomandazione del Consiglio (2018). Competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. Quadro di riferimento europeo. Text available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01). Last accessed 2021/10/19.
  20. Resnick L.B. (1987). The 1987 Presidential Address: Learning in School and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9): 13-20. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X016009013.
  21. Rossi P.G., Giannandrea L., Gratani F., Laici C., Tarantino A. and Paviotti G. (in press). Assessment as learning: transforming practices with secondary school teachers. ICERI2021 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED.
  22. Schmidt H.G., Rotgans J.I. and Yew E. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8): 792-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
  23. Schmidt H.G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27: 422-432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00296.x.
  24. Skinner B.F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  25. Stiggins R.J. (2002). Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappa, 83(10): 758-765. DOI: 10.1177/003172170208301010.
  26. Tessaro F. (2014) Compiti autentici o prove di realtà? FORMAZIONE & INSEGNAMENTO. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell’educazione e della formazione, 12(3): 77-88. DOI: 107346/-fei-XII-03-14_07.
  27. Zeng W., Huang F., Yu L. and Chen S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning – a critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30: 211-250. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...