Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Saggi

No. 95 (2026)

Implementation contexts, operational mediations, and trajectories of change: an evaluative study of the Ri-Belli project

  • Elvira Celardi
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/Riv2026oa23360
Submitted
luglio 24, 2026
Published
2026-09-21

Abstract

This article examines, through the case of the Ri-Belli project, an intervention aimed at addressing educational poverty, the implementation conditions and operational mediations that shape trajectories of change. Adopting a possibilist perspective and a theory-based reading of implementation, it interprets change as a situated outcome produced through the interaction between project resources, implementation contexts, and family arrangements.
The analysis reconstructs recurrent territorial and family configurations and shows, through the case of an affective education initiative, how the same intervention can generate different trajectories: convergence, misalignment, or transformative adaptation. The article argues that evaluating these interventions requires shifting attention away from mere outcome verification and towards understanding the conditions that make change possible, hinder its consolidation, or redirect its course.

References

  1. Banks, J.A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In: Banks, J.A. and Banks C.A.M., a cura di, Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3-29.
  2. Baumrind, D. (1967). Childcare practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 1: 43-88. DOI: 10.1037/h0024919
  3. Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 1: 5-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson J.G., a cura di, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241-258.
  5. Brodkin, E.Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 3: 317-336. DOI: 10.1080/01900690701590587
  6. Camus, A. (1951). L'homme révolté. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: L'uomo in rivolta. Milano: Bompiani, 1981).
  7. Celardi, E. (2025). Riconoscere e valutare il cambiamento. Diario di un’esperienza di contrasto alla povertà educativa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Celardi, E., Mazzeo Rinaldi, F., Occhipinti, O. (2026). Il ruolo del contesto negli interventi di contrasto alla povertà educativa. Un’esperienza di ricerca. In: Gozzo S., a cura di, La povertà educativa da una prospettiva sociologica. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 73-90.
  9. Hirschman, A.O. (1967). Development Projects Observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  10. Klaus, H. (1998). The International Teen STAR Program. Bethesda, MD: Teen STAR Program. ERIC Document ED424510.
  11. Koleros, A., Mulkerne, S., Oldenbeuving, M., Stein, D. (2020). The actor-based change framework: A pragmatic approach to developing program theory for interventions in complex systems. American Journal of Evaluation, 41, 1: 34-53. DOI: 10.1177/1098214018786462
  12. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  13. Patton, M.Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press.
  14. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
  15. Pawson, R., Tilley N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
  16. Petino, G., Wilson, J.S., Torre, S. (2022). La fascia trasformata siciliana: il territorio tra crisi socioecologica e vulnerabilità. In: Amato F., Amato V., de Falco S., La Foresta D. and Simonetti L., a cura di, Catene/Chains. Memorie geografiche NS 21. Firenze: Società di Studi Geografici, pp. 489-494.
  17. Save the Children Italia (2023). Piccoli schiavi invisibili. Dentro lo sfruttamento: un’indagine sui figli dei braccianti a Latina e Ragusa. Roma: Save the Children Italia - ETS.
  18. Stame, N. (2019). Doubt, Surprise, and the Ethical Evaluator: Lessons from the Work of Judith Tendler. Evaluation, 25, 4: 449-468. DOI: 10.1177/1356389019879458
  19. Stame, N. (2022). Tra possibilismo e valutazione. Judith Tendler e Albert Hirschman. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  20. Tendler, J. (1992). Progetti ed effetti. Il mestiere di valutatore. Napoli: Liguori.
  21. Weiss, C.H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76: 41-55. DOI: 10.1002/ev.1086