Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Geography and artificial intelligence: Spatialities, networks, narratives in the algorithmic society

No. 1 (2026)

Public strategies and narrative for artificial intelligence: a critical and comparative analysis of Europan cases

  • Daniela La Foresta
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa1-2026oa22429
Submitted
aprile 8, 2026
Published
2026-05-11

Abstract

Artificial intelligence represents a crucial arena in which state power is articulated, as well as a strategic asset within the dynamics of global technological competition. Owing to its cross-cutting nature, it profoundly affects governance models and paradigms of development, raising questions regarding technological sovereignty and the regulatory capacity of states. Within this framework, national artificial intelligence strategies should be understood as discursive and sociotechnical constructs through which states produce imaginaries of the future, define normative priorities, and perform their international positioning. The contribution offers a comparative analysis of the strategies adopted by European countries, with the aim of examining how they contribute to the multilayered construction of a EU’s governance of artificial intelligence.

References

  1. Adigwe C.S., Olaniyi O.O., Olabanji S.O., Okunleye O.J., Mayeke N.R, Ajayi S.A. (2024). Forecasting the future: The interplay of artificial intelligence, innovation, and competitiveness and its effect on the global economy. Asian journal of economics, business and accounting, 24(4): 126-146. DOI: 10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i41269.
  2. Agnew J. (2013). The origins of critical geopolitics. In: Dodds K., Kuus M., Sharp J., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics. London: Ashgate.
  3. Bellanova R., Carrapico H., Duez, D. (2022). Digital sovereignty and European security integration: An introduction. European Security, 31(3): 337-355. DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887.
  4. Bowen G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27-40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
  5. Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Taddeo M., Floridi L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2): 505-528. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7.
  6. Commissione Europea (2018). Comunicazione della Commissione al Parlamento Europeo, al Consiglio, al Comitato Economico e Sociale Europeo e al Comitato delle Regioni: Intelligenza artificiale per l’Europa (COM (2018) 237 final). Bruxelles: Commissione Europea.
  7. Commissione Europea (2020). Libro bianco sull’intelligenza artificiale: un approccio europeo all’eccellenza e alla fiducia (COM (2020) 65 final). Bruxelles: Commissione Europea.
  8. Commissione Europea (2021). European Enterprise Survey on the Use of Technologies Based on Artificial Intelligence. Bruxelles: Commissione Europea.
  9. Commissione Europea (2021). Proposta di regolamento del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio che stabilisce norme armonizzate sull’intelligenza artificiale (legge sull’intelligenza artificiale) e modifica alcuni atti legislativi dell’Unione (COM (2021) 206 final). Bruxelles: Commissione Europea.
  10. Commissione Europea (2022-2024). AI Watch. Testo disponibile al sito: https://ai-watch.ec.europa.eu/index_en (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  11. Commissione Europea (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2022 - Integration of Digital Technology. Testo disponibile al sito: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/88767 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  12. Consiglio dei Ministri bulgaro (2020). Concept for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Bulgaria until 2030. Testo disponibile al sito: www.mtc.government.bg/sites/default/files/conceptforthedevelopmentofaiinbulgariauntil2030.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  13. Crawford K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  14. Dafoe A. (2018). AI Governance: A Research Agenda. Governance of AI Program, Future of Humanity Institute. Oxford: University of Oxford.
  15. Dalby S. (1991). Critical geopolitics: Discourse, difference, and dissent. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9(3): 261-283. DOI: 10.1068/d090261.
  16. Eurostat (2025). Usage of AI technologies increasing in EU enterprises. Testo disponibile al sito: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250123-3 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  17. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (2000). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1.
  18. European Commission (2023a). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2023. Testo disponibile al sito: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/desi-methodological-note-digital-decade-report-2023 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  19. European Commission (2023b). State of the Digital Decade 2023. Testo disponibile al sito: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/2023-report-state-digital-decade (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  20. European Commission (2024a). Digital Decade Policy Programme. Testo disponibile al sito: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-decade-policy-programme (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  21. European Commission (2024b). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2024. Testo disponibile al sito: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade-2024-desi-methodological-note (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  22. Eurostat (2024). GERD by sector of performance (rd_e_gerdtot). Dati disponibili al sito: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/rd_e_gerdtot/default/table?lang=en (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  23. Fairclough N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge.
  24. Ferretti T. (2022). An institutionalist approach to AI ethics: Justifying the priority of government regulation over self-regulation. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 9(2): 239-265. DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0056.
  25. Floridi L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy and Technology, 33: 369-378. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6.
  26. Floridi L. (2021). The European legislation on AI: A brief analysis of its philosophical approach. Philosophy and Technology, 34: 215-222. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-021-00460-9.
  27. Galindo L., Perset K., Sheeka F. (2021). An overview of national AI strategies and policies. OECD Going Digital Toolkit Notes, No. 14, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/c05140d9-en.
  28. Gerlich M. (2024). Brace for impact: Facing the AI revolution and geopolitical shifts in a future societal scenario for 2025-2040. Societies, 14(9): 180. DOI: 10.3390/soc14090180.
  29. Government of Finland (2020). Finland’s Integrated Energy and Climate Plan - National Energy and Climate Strategy. Testo disponibile al sito: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a2a4d9c-f040-4317-9383-9ac03fb3994b/content (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  30. Governo dei Paesi Bassi (2019). Strategic Action Plan for Artificial Intelligence. Testo disponibile al sito: https://wp.oecd.ai/app/uploads/2021/12/Netherlands_Strategic_Action_Plan_for_Artificial_Intelligence.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  31. Governo della Romania (2024). Strategia Națională în domeniul inteligenței artificiale 2024-2027. Testo disponibile al sito: www.mcid.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/SN-IA-final.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  32. Gruppo di esperti ad alto livello sull’intelligenza artificiale (2019). Linee guida etiche per un’IA affidabile. Bruxelles: Commissione Europea.
  33. Hafsi T., Martin de Holan P. (1996). The study of national strategic management: A methodological discussion, Working Papers 618, Economic Research Forum. Testo disponibile al sito: https://erf.org.eg/publications/study-national-strategic-management-methodological-discussion/?tab=undefined&c=undefined (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  34. Jasanoff S., Kim S.H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001.
  35. Jasanoff S., Simmet H.R. (2017). No funeral bells: Public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age. Social Studies of Science, 47(5): 751-770. DOI: 10.1177/0306312717731936.
  36. Manning C.D., Raghavan P., Schütze H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511809071.
  37. Mazzucato M., Kattel R. (2020). COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1): S256-S269. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/graa031.
  38. Mazzucato M., Semieniuk G. (2017). Public financing of innovation: New questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1): 24-48. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grw036.
  39. Ministero dell’Economia e dell’Occupazione finlandese (2017). Finland’s Age of Artificial Intelligence. Testo disponibile al sito: https://tem.fi/en/publication?pubid=URN:ISBN:978-952-327-290-3 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  40. Ministero dell’Economia e dell’Occupazione finlandese (2019). Leading the way into the age of Artificial Intelligence. Testo disponibile al sito: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/46b11993-5f8f-4925-a201-56e75ddc60e6/content (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  41. Ministero dell’Innovazione Tecnologica e Transizione Digitale (2022). Programma strategico Intelligenza Artificiale. Testo disponibile al sito: www.mur.gov.it/sites/default/files/2021-12/AI_strategia_nazionale_programma-strategico-ita.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  42. Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca e Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2020). Strategia Nazionale per l’Intelligenza Artificiale. Testo disponibile al sito: /www.mimit.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/Strategia_Nazionale_AI_2020.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  43. Ministero dello Sviluppo Digitale polacco (2020). Policy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Poland from 2020. Testo disponibile al sito: https://wp.oecd.ai/app/uploads/2021/12/Poland_Policy_for_Artificial_Intelligence_Development_in_Poland_from_2020_2020.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  44. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland (2023). Artificial Intelligence 4.0 – Finland’s updated national AI strategy. Testo disponibile al sito: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/164778 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  45. Ministry of Finance of Finland (2019). AuroraAI - Towards a Human-Centric Society. Testo disponibile al sito: https://vm.fi/en/auroraai (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  46. OECD AI Policy Observatory (2019-2024). AI Coalition of the Netherlands. Testo disponibile al sito: https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/ai-coalition-of-the-netherlands-3341 (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  47. OECD (2021). AI Policy Observatory - Country Dashboards. Testo disponibile al sito: https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/national (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  48. Osservatorio Artificial Intelligence del Politecnico di Milano (2023a). Artificial Intelligence: nuovi orizzonti per le imprese italiane. Testo disponibile al sito: https://documenti.camera.it/leg19/documentiAcquisiti/COM10/Audizioni/leg19.com10.Audizioni.Memoria.PUBBLICO.ideGes.28196.31-01-2024-16-21-19.006.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  49. Osservatorio Artificial Intelligence del Politecnico di Milano (2023b). Artificial Intelligence in Italia nel 2023. Testo disponibile al sito: www.osservatori.net/report/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-italia-2023-chatgpt-report/ (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  50. Oxford Insights (2023). Government AI Readiness Index 2023. Testo disponibile al sito: https://oxfordinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023-Government-AI-Readiness-Index-1.pdf (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  51. Prior T., Hagmann J. (2014). Measuring resilience: Methodological and political challenges of a trend security concept. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3): 281-298. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2013.808686.
  52. Rajaraman A., Ullman J.D. (2011). Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139924801.
  53. Roberts H., Cowls J., Morley J., Taddeo M., Wang V., Floridi, L. (2023). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, 38: 153-169. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.
  54. Sabouri Z., Mehrdel B. (2024). New geopolitics of artificial intelligence and the challenges of global governance. CIFILE Journal of International Law, 5(10): 120-144. DOI: 10.30489/cifj.2024.431044.1094.
  55. Schiølin K. (2020). Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science, 50(4): 542-566. DOI: 10.1177/0306312719867768.
  56. Seawright J., Gerring J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2): 294-308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077.
  57. Stanford University (2023). The AI Index 2023 Annual Report. AI Index Steering Committee, Human-Centered AI Institute. Testo disponibile al sito: https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2023-ai-index-report (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  58. Techleap.nl (2023). Dutch AI Ecosystem Report 2022-2023. Testo disponibile al sito: https://techleap.nl/reports/the-state-of-dutch-tech-2023-report (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  59. EU-Startups (2025). Startups Driving Europe’s AI Transformation. Testo disponibile al sito: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/supporting-apply-ai-strategy-ai-startand-investment-activity-across-10-key-industrial-sectors (consultato il 23/12/2025).
  60. Ulnicane I., Knight W., Leach T., Stahl B.C., Wanjiku W.G. (2021). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: Insights from AI policy. Policy and Society, 40(2): 158-177. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800.
  61. Van Deursen A.J., Van Der Zeeuw A., De Boer P., Jansen G., Van Rompay T. (2021). Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: Differences in attitudes, material access, skills, and usage. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2): 258-276. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646777.
  62. Van Lente H., Rip A. (1998). Expectations in technological developments: An example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In: Disco N.C., van Der Meulen B., eds., Getting new technologies together: Studies in making sociotechnical order (pp. 203-231). Berlino: De Gruyter.
  63. Van Roy V., Rossetti F., Perset K., Galindo-Romero L. (2021). AI Watch - National strategies on Artificial Intelligence: A European perspective. Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN: 978-92-76-52910-1.
  64. Veale M., Borgesius F.Z. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law Review International, 22(4): 97-112. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.03721.
  65. Vesnic-Alujevic L., Nascimento S., Pólvora A. (2020). Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961.
  66. Wodak R., Meyer M., eds. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies. London: Sage.