Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Geography and artificial intelligence: Spatialities, networks, narratives in the algorithmic society

No. 1 (2026)

Artificial intelligence and energy demand: a geographical perspective

  • Domenico de Vincenzo
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa1-2026oa22422
Submitted
aprile 8, 2026
Published
2026-05-11

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is closely linked to energy. Its fundamental infrastructures, data centers, require large amounts of energy. This strong dependence on geographically concentrated energy sources makes AI a territorially selective and, at the same time, ambivalent technology: it can contribute to energy efficiency and ecological transition, but it can also generate new socio-environmental imbalances. The growing global energy demand from data centers, which, according to the International Energy Agency, could more than double by 2030, significantly impacts the spatial organization of digital infrastructures.
The location criteria of data centers vary depending on the function they serve within artificial intelligence systems, distinguishing two main phases: training and inference. The training phase requires high energy consumption but does not impose strict constraints on network latency. As a result, data centers dedicated to this phase tend to be located in peripheral areas. In the inference phase, which involves real-time interaction between artificial intelligence systems and users, priority is given to network speed and reliability, factors that drive the placement of data centers closer to major urban centers. These choices perpetuate environmental and energy injustices, where some territories specialize in attracting large digital infrastructures, often with high environmental impacts, while bearing the negative consequences. The presence of hyperscale data centers can indeed trigger conflicts over the use of energy and environmental resources, highlighting the increasingly central role of territory in the dynamics of the digital economy.

References

  1. Andrae A.S.G., Edler T. (2015). On global electricity usage of communication technology: Trends to 2030. Challenges, 6(1): 117-157. DOI: 10.3390/challe6010117.
  2. Bolón-Canedo V., Morán-Fernández L., Cancela B., Alonso-Betanzos A. (12024). A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing, 599. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128096.
  3. Bourzac K. (2024). Fixing AI’s energy crisis. Nature.com, 17 ottobre 2025. Testo disponibile al sito: www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03408-z (consultato il 12 dicembre 2025).
  4. Bridge G., Gailing L. (2020). New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6): 1037-1050. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X2093957
  5. Central Statistics Office (2024). Data Centres Metered Electricity Consumption 2023. Ireland Central Statistics Office. Testo disponibile al sito: cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-dcmec/datacentresmeteredelectricityconsumption2023/keyfindings/ (consultato il 23 luglio 2025).
  6. Cleveland-Peck P. (2025). Microsoft Feels the Heat as ‘Carbon Negative’ Goal Looms Nearer. The Wall Street Journal, wsj.com, 29 maggio.
  7. Commissione Europea (2023). Regolamento delegato della Commissione n. 1087 del 10/2/2023.
  8. Cowls J., Tsamados A., Taddeo M., Floridi L. (2023). The AI gambit: Leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change - Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. AI & Society, 38: 283-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x
  9. Davis M. (2024). Impact of Pollution on Marginalized Communities: Case Study of Omaha, Nebraska. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
  10. De Falco S. (2024). Urban dimension of crypto mines dynamics: A spatial approach. USA focus. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 139: 115-136. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2024-139006.
  11. de Roucy-Rochegonde L., Buffard A. (2025). AI, Data Centers and Energy Demand: Reassessing and Exploring the Trends. Parigi: Ifri.
  12. de Vries A. (2023). The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, 7(10): 2191-2194.
  13. Engel A., Posner D., Varadarajan U. (2025). How “power couples” can help the United States win the global AI race. RMI, Rocky Mountain Institute, rmi.org, 20 febbraio.
  14. EOG (2024), OpenAI Invests in Nuclear Fusion. Energy Oil & Gas Magazine, energy-oilgas.com/news/openai-invests-in-nuclear-fusion/, 5 giugno.
  15. Deegan G. (2024). Google plan for new data centre rejected in face of electricity supply pinch. The Irish Time, irishtimes.com, 27 agosto.
  16. Dhiman R., Miteff S., Wang Y., Ma S.-C., Amirikas R., Fabian B. (2024). Artificial intelligence and sustainability - A review. Analytics 3(1): 140-164. DOI: 10.3390/analytics3010008.
  17. Gardner T. (2024). US closes $1.52 billion loan to resurrect Michigan nuclear plant. Reuters, reuters.com, 1 ottobre.
  18. Google (2024). Environmental Report, disponibile al sito: gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2024-environmental-report.pdf (consultato il 12 dicembre 2025).
  19. Goldman Sachs (2024). AI is poised to drive 160% increase in data center power demand. Goldman Sachs. Testo disponibile al sito: goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/AIpoised-to-drive-160-increase-in-power-demand (consultato il 14 maggio 2025).
  20. Gopal K. (2025). Trump signs executive orders to boost nuclear energy, reduce oversight. Inside Climate News, insideclimatenews.org, 23 maggio.
  21. Halper E. (2024). How Google and Meta data centers are keeping coal alive in Omaha. The Washington Post, washingtonpost.com, 12 ottobre.
  22. Halper E., O’Donovan C. (2024). AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution. The Washington Post, washingtonpost.com, 21 giugno.
  23. Harris D. (2024). Sustainable strides: How AI and accelerated computing are driving energy efficiency. Nvidia. Testo disponibile al sito: blogs.nvidia.com/blog/acceleratedai-energy-efficiency/ (consultato il 22 luglio).
  24. IEA (2024a). World Energy Outlook 2024. Ginevra: International Energy Agency.
  25. IEA (2024b). Electricity 2024. Analysis and Forecast to 2026. Ginevra: International Energy Agency.
  26. IEA (2024c). Renewables 2024. Analysis and Forecast to 2030. Ginevra: International Energy Agency.
  27. IEA (2025). Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. Parigi: International Energy Agency.
  28. Kamiya G., Coroamă V.C. (2025). Data Centre Energy Use: Critical Review of Models and Results. EDNA-IEA 4E TCP.
  29. Kimball S. (2024). Microsoft’s carbon emissions up 30% since 2020 due to data center expansion. CNBC, cnbc.com, 15 maggio.
  30. KPMG (2024). Data Centers in Ireland. KPMG, kpmg.com, 21 novembre.
  31. Leon L.F.A. (2024). AI and global climate change: The political economy of data and energy in geographic perspective. Geography and Environment, 11(1). DOI: 10.1002/geo2.134.
  32. Li P., Yang J., Islam M.A., Ren S. (2025). Making AI less “thirsty”: Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. ArXiv: 2304.03271v4. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.03271.
  33. Li W., Li J.-P., Wang Y.-F., Stan S.-E. (2025). Is artificial intelligence an impediment or an impetus to renewable energy investment? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 147. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108550
  34. Masley A. (2025). Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment. The Weird Turn Pro, andymasley.substack.com, 13 gennaio.
  35. Mauludin M.S., Khairudin M., Asnawi R., Mustafa W.A., Fauziah T.S. (2025).
  36. The advancement of artificial intelligence’s application in hybrid solar and wind power plant optimization: A study of the literature. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 50(2): 279-293. DOI: 10.37934/araset.50.2.279293.
  37. McKinsey & Company (2024). Global Energy Perspective 2024. Rapporto.
  38. McLean J. (2024). Responsibility, care and repair in/of AI: Extinction threats and more-than-real worlds. Environment and Planning F, 3(1-2): 3-16. DOI: 10.1177/26349825241228586
  39. Meta (2023). Environmental Data Index. Meta Sustainability Report.
  40. Metz R. (2024). Google’s emissions shot-up 48% over five years due to AI. Bloomberg, bloomberg.com, 2 luglio.
  41. Microsoft (2024). How can we advance sustainability? Environmental Sustainability Report.
  42. Nost E. (2024). Governing AI, governing climate change? Geography and Environment, 11(1). DOI: 10.1002/geo2.138.
  43. NVIDIA (2024). Investor-Presentation, October 2024.
  44. Olatunde T.M., Okwandu A.C., Akande D.O., Sikhakhane Z.Q. (2024). Reviewing the role of artificial intelligence in energy efficiency optimization. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(4): 1243-1256. DOI: 10.51594/estj/v5i4.1015.
  45. Parlamento Europeo (2023). Direttiva (UE) 2023/1791 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio del 13 settembre 2023.
  46. Penn I., Conger K. (2024). Why a Memphis community is fighting Elon Musk’s supercomputer. The New York Times, nytimes.com, 16 ottobre.
  47. Penn I., Weise K. (2024). Hungry for energy, Amazon, Google and Microsoft turn to nuclear power. The New York Times, nytimes.com, 31 ottobre.
  48. Pimenow S., Pimenowa O., Prus P. (2024). Challenges of artificial intelligence development in the context of energy consumption and impact on climate change. Energies, 17(23). DOI: 10.3390/en17235965.
  49. Sandalow D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Climate Change Mitigation Roadmap, seconda edizione, ICEF.
  50. Sætra H.S. (2021). AI in context and the sustainable development goals: Factoring in the unsustainability of the sociotechnical system. Sustainability, 13(4). DOI: 10.3390/su13041738.
  51. SELC (2025a). Musk’s xAI explores another massive methane gas turbine installation at second South Memphis data center. Southern Environmental Law Center, disponibile al sito: www.selc.org/press-release/musks-xai-explores-another-massive-methane-gasturbine-
  52. installation-at-second-south-memphis-data-center/ (consultato l’8 maggio 2025).
  53. SELC (2025b). Elon Musk’s xAI facility is using gas turbines in South Memphis, we’re taking action, Southern Environmental Law Center, disponibile al sito: selc.org/news/resistance-against-elon-musks-xai-facility-in-south-memphis-gets-stronger/ (consultato il 17 giugno 2025).
  54. Shehabi A., Smith S.J., Hubbard A., Newkirk A., Lei N., Siddik M.A.B., Holecek B., Koomey J., Masanet E., Sartor D. (2024). 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report. Berkeley (California): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
  55. Spencer T., Singh S. (2024). What the data centre and AI boom could mean for the energy sector. International Energy Agency, disponibile al sito: iea.org/commentaries/what-the-data-centre-and-ai-boom-could-mean-for-the-energy-sector (consultato il 18 ottobre 2025).
  56. Srivathsan B., Sorel M., Sachdeva P. et al. (2024). AI power - Expanding data center capacity to meet growing demand, McKinsey & Company, mckinsey.com.
  57. Stein C. (2025). Trump signs executive orders to spur US ‘nuclear energy renaissance’. The Guardian, theguardian.com, 23 maggio.
  58. Strubel E., Ganesh A., McCallum A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NPL. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Firenze: Association for Computational Linguistics: 3645-3650.
  59. Verdecchia R., Sallou J., Cruz L. (2023). A systematic review of green AI. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13(4). DOI: 10.1002/widm.1507.
  60. Wang B., Wang J., Dong K., Nepal R. (2024). How does artificial intelligence affect high-quality energy development? Achieving a clean energy transition society. Energy Policy, 186. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114010.
  61. Wang Q., Li Y., Li R. (2024). Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11.
  62. Wittenberg A. (2025). ‘How come I can’t breathe?’: Musk’s data company draws a backlash in Memphis. Politico, politico.com, 5 giugno.
  63. You J. (2025). How much energy does ChatGPT use? Epoch AI, epoch.ai, 7 febbraio.
  64. Zook M. (2005). The Geography of the Internet Industry. Venture Capital, Dot-Coms, and Local Knowledge. Malden, MA (USA): Blackwell Publishing.
  65. Zook M., McCanless M. (2022). Mapping the uneven geographies of digital phenomena: The case of blockchain. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 66(1): 23-36.DOI: 10.1111/cag.12738.