Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Cultural Political Economy and Local Innovation Ecosystems: A Forum for Tommaso Fasciani

No. 4 (2025)

Cultural Political Economy and Local Innovation Ecosystems: A Forum for Tommaso Fasciani

  • Gianluca Bei
  • Barbara Brollo
  • Filippo Celata
  • Ernesto d'Albergo
  • Cesare Di Feliciantonio
  • Edoardo Esposito
  • Giorgio Giovanelli
  • Giulio Moini
  • Tiziana Nupieri
  • Barbara Pizzo
  • Giacomo Spanu
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa4-2025oa21689
Submitted
dicembre 15, 2025
Published
2026-01-12

Abstract

Gianluca Bei, Giacomo Spanu
Seguire le tracce: nuove prospettive geografiche tra cultural political eco-nomy e social fix

Edoardo Esposto, Giulio Moini, Barbara Pizzo
Il regime urbano di Roma alla prova della knowledge economy: rifles-sioni a partire dalla ricerca di Tommaso Fasciani sul Rome Technopole

Barbara Brollo
La conoscenza dell’economia della conoscenza: percorsi critici per Roma

Cesare Di Feliciantonio
Un’incursione femminista nel lavoro di Tommaso

Ernesto d’Albergo, Giorgio Giovanelli, Tiziana Nupieri
Dentro l’ecosistema dell’innovazione: proseguire l’analisi sociologica del Rome Technopole

References

  1. Arruzza C. (2016). Functionalist, determinist, reductionist: Social reproduction feminism and its critics. Science & Society, 80(1): 9-30. DOI: 10.1521/siso.2016.80.1.9
  2. Barnes T.J. (2001). Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the “cultural turn”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3): 546-565. DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.00258.
  3. Bell D. (1973). e Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Benini R., De Nardis S. (2013). Capitale senza capitale: Roma e il declino d’Italia. Roma: Donzelli.
  5. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  6. Brollo, B. (2024). Soggetti, eetti e pratiche urbane delle popolazioni temporanee. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Bronzini R., a cura di (2019). L’economia di Roma negli anni Duemila. Cambiamenti strutturali, mercato del lavoro, diseguaglianze. Working Paper Banca d’Italia, 793. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4849190.
  8. Brown W. (2011). Neoliberalized knowledge. History of the Present, 1(1): 113-129. DOI 10.5406/historypresent.1.1.0113.
  9. Celata F. (2011). La geograÿa economica tra evoluzione e crisi. Rivista geografica italiana, 118(2): 347-354.
  10. Celata F., Galdini R., Lucciarini S., Simone A. (2021). Un manifesto per Roma. Il diritto a una città giusta. Percorsi per uscire dalla crisi del valore. Roma Ricerca Roma. www.ricercaroma.it/proposte/ (consultato il 10/09/2025).
  11. Cohen M.D., March J.G., Olsen J.P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1): 1-25.
  12. Cox K.R. (1998). Spaces of Dependences, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics. Political Geography, 17(1): 1-23.
  13. Crenshaw K.W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241-1299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039.
  14. Crozier M., Friedberg E. (1978). Attore sociale e sistema. Milano: Etas.
  15. d’Albergo E., Moini G. (2015). Il regime dell’Urbe. Politica, economia e potere a Roma. Roma: Carocci.
  16. d’Albergo E., Moini G., Pizzo B. (2016). Cosa vuol dire «metropolitano» a Roma? Incertezze e ambiguità economiche, spaziali e politiche di un sistema urbano. In: Cellamare C., a cura di, Fuori raccordo. Abitare l’altra Roma. Roma: Donzelli.
  17. d’Albergo E., Moini G., Pizzo B. (2018). e uncertain metropolization of Rome: economy, space and governance. In: Gross J., Gualini E., Ye L., a cura di, Constructing Metropolitan Space Actors, Policies and Processes of Rescaling in World Metropolises. Londra-New York: Routledge.
  18. Dematteis G. (2012). Sul riposizionamento della Geograÿa come conoscenza del possibile. Rivista geografica italiana, 119(1): 85-94.
  19. De Muro P., Monni S., Tridico P. (2011). Knowledge-based economy and social exclusion: Shadows and lights in the Roman socio-conomic model. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6): 1212–1238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00993.x.
  20. England K.V. (1994). Getting personal: Reexivity, positionality, and feminist research. e Professional Geographer, 46(1): 80-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080
  21. Esposto E., Moini G., Pizzo B. (2021). The political economy of a collusive urban regime: making sense of urban development projects in Rome. Partecipazione e conitto, 14(2): 806-828. DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v14i2p806.
  22. Fasciani T. (2021). Agende e politiche urbane per l’economia: ecosistemi dell’innovazione a Roma e Milano. Working Papers – Urban@it, 12. DOI: 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/6790.
  23. Fasciani T. (2024). Il potere politico e il concetto di egemonia. In: d’Albergo E., Moini G., a cura di, Sociologia della politica contemporanea (pp. 91-102). Roma: Carocci.
  24. Fasciani T. (2025). For a sociology of local innovation ecosystems. A work in progress on NRRP and the Rome Technopole. Roma: Sapienza University Press.
  25. Gallino L. (2023). Una civiltà in crisi. Contraddizioni del capitalismo. Torino: Einaudi.
  26. Garton L., Haythornthwaite C., Wellman B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1): JCMC313. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00062.x.
  27. Goldstein M.B. (2018). Spazialità in Gramsci. Appunti per una critica geo-storica del mondo contemporaneo. Rivista geograca italiana, 125(3): 383-402.
  28. Governa F., Rossi U., Dini F., Vegetti M., Memoli M. (2019). Opinioni e dibattiti: interpretazioni gramsciane in chiave geograca: alcune frontiere di ricerca. Rivista geografica italiana, 126(4): 193-235. DOI: 10.3280/RGI2019-004010.
  29. Halgin D.S., Borgatti S.P. (2012). An introduction to personal network analysis and tie churn statistics using E-NET. Connections, 32(1): 37-48.
  30. Harvey D. (1982). e limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  31. Harvey D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1): 3-17. DOI: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
  32. Harvey D. (1982). e limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  33. Harvey D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1): 3-17. DOI: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
  34. Jessop B. (1997). A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance. In Lauria M., Ed., Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. London: Sage.
  35. Jessop B. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal x and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2): 323-360. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00251.
  36. Jessop B. (2002). e Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  37. Jessop B. (2008). Institutions and institutionalism in political economy: a strategicrelational approach. In: Pierre J., Peters B.G., Stoker G., a cura di, Debating Institutionalism. Londra: Plagrave Macmillan.
  38. Jessop B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 3(3-4): 336-356. DOI: 10.1080/19460171003619741.
  39. Jessop B. (2015). Crisis construal in the North Atlantic nancial crisis and the Eurozone crisis. Competition & Change, 19(2): 95-112. DOI: 10.1177/1024529415571866.
  40. Jessop B. (2017a). On Academic Capitalism. Critical Policy Studies, 12(1): 104-109. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1403342.
  41. Jessop B. (2017b). Varieties of Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurial Universities: On past Research and Tree trought Experiments. Higher Education, 73(6): 853-870. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0120-6.
  42. Jessop B., Sum N.L. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  43. Knoke D., Kuklinski J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  44. Mazzucato M. (2013). e Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
  45. O’Donovan N. (2020). From knowledge economy to automation anxiety: a growth regime in crisis? New political economy, 25(2): 248-266. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1590326.
  46. Pizzo B. (2023). Vivere o morire di rendita. La rendita urbana nel XXI secolo. Roma: Donzelli.
  47. Radder H. (2010). e Commodication of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7zw87p.
  48. Reffay C., Chanier T. (2002). Social network analysis used for modelling collaboration in distance learning groups. In: Cerri S.A., Gouardères G., Paraguaçu F., a cura di, Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2363. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  49. Ribera-Fumaz R. (2009). From urban political economy to cultural political economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4): 447-465. DOI: 10.1177/0309132508096352.
  50. Rossi U., Vanolo A. (2024). Nuova geografia politica urbana. Roma-Bari: Gius. Laterza & Figli.
  51. Scott J. (1997). L’analisi delle reti sociali. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
  52. Slater D. (1992). On the borders of social theory: learning from other regions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10(3): 307-327. DOI: 10.1068/d100307.
  53. Slaughter S., Leslie L. (1997). Academic Capitalism; Politics, Policies and The Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  54. Slaughter S.,Rhoades G. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimora: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: 10.56021/9780801879494.
  55. Sum N.L., Jessop B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  56. Tocci W. (2015). Roma: non si piange su una città coloniale. Roma-Firenze: goWare.
  57. Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Werner M., Strauss K., Parker B., Orzcek R., Derickson K., Bonds A. (2017). Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for? Geoforum, 79: 1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013.