Papers
No. 3 (2023)
Geographies of the eco-climate crisis in the mountain: the social production of the environment and contested futures in the Dolomites
Abstract
In the framework of the eco-climate crisis, of the governance and related policymaking processes at the global scale, over the last years geography and political ecology have highlighted the political and controversial nature of the environment and related politics. However, the analysis of these processes on the mountain environment needs further research because of the effects of the eco-climate crisis and the heterogeneous paths of development and conservation that characterize highlands. By bridging political ecology and mountain geography, this contribution aims to reflect on the social production of the mountain environment, and related futures in the Dolomites, through the analysis of governance, development projects and environmental claims. The research, through the adoption of ethnographic methods, highlights the political, controversial and contested nature of socio-environmental relations and specifically of the environmental futures of the Dolomites in relation to the eco-climate crisis. Therefore, the case of the Dolomites provides a significant contribution to reflect on progressive mountain environment repoliticization while the theoretical and methodological integration of political ecology and ethnography offers and innovative perspective to advance mountain geographies scholarship.
References
- Agenzia provinciale per la protezione dell’ambiente (2022). I cambiamenti climatici in Trentino: osservazioni, scenari futuri e impatti, Provincia Autonoma di Trento.
- Balsiger J. e Debarbieux B. (2015). Should mountains (really) matter in science and policy? Environmental Science & Policy, 49: 23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.015
- Bandiera M. e Bini V. (2020). I territori dell’ecologia politica: teorie, spazi, conflitti. Geography Notebooks, 2, 3: 11-24.
- Barbera F. e De Rossi A., a cura di (2021). Metromontagna: un progetto per riabitare l’Italia. Roma: Donzelli Editore.
- Benjaminsen T.A. e Svarstad H. (2021). Political Ecology – A critical engagement with global environmental issues. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillian, 2021.
- Bonati S., Tononi M. e Zanolin G. (2021). Social nature geographies. Le geografie e l’approccio sociale alla natura. Rivista geografica italiana, 128, 2: 5-20. DOI 10.3280/rgioa2-2021oa12029
- Bryant R.L. (2017). The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Büscher B. e Fletcher R. (2020). The Conservation Revolution: Radical ideas for saving nature in the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
- Casanova L. (2020). Avere cura della montagna. L’Italia si salva dalla cima. Milano: Altreconomia.
- Castiglioni B. e Varotto M., a cura di (2012). Di chi sono le Alpi? Appartenenze politiche, economiche e culturali nel mondo alpino contemporaneo. Padova: Padova University Press.
- Castree N. (2003). Environmental Issues: Relational Ontologies and Hybrid Politics. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 2: 321-334. DOI: 10.1191/0309132503ph422pr
- Castree N. (2014). Making sense of nature: Knowledge, politics and democracy. London: Routledge.
- Ciaschi A. (2012). Montagna. Questione geografica e non solo. Viterbo: Sette Città.
- Debarbieux B. e Price M.F. (2008). Representing Mountains: From Local and National to Global Common Good. Geopolitics, 13, 1: 148-168. DOI: 10.1080/14650040701783375
- Dematteis G. (2018). La metro-montagna di fronte alle sfide globali. Riflessioni a partire dal caso di Torino. Journal of Alpine Research, 106, 2: 34-44. DOI: 10.4000/rga.4318
- Ernstson H. e Swyngedouw E. (2019). Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-Obscene. London and New York: Routledge.
- Ferrario V. e Marzo M. (2020). La montagna che produce. Milano: Mimesis.
- Fonstad M.A. (2017). Mountains: A Special Issue. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 2: 235-237. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1260898
- Forsyth T. (1998). Mountain myths revisited: integrating natural and social environmental science. Mountain Research and Development, 18: 107-116. DOI: 10.2307/3673966
- Funnel D. e Price M. (2003). Mountain geography: a review. The Geographical Journal, 169, 3: 183-190. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4959.00083
- Hay I. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (Quarta Edizione), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Heynen N., Kaika M. e Swyngedouw E. (2006). In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London and New York: Routledge.
- IPCC Climate Change (2022). Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ives J.D. e Messerli B. (1990). Progress in theoretical and applied mountain research 1973-1989, and future needs. Mountain Research and Development, 10: 101-127. DOI: 10.2307/3673422
- Kothari A., Salleh A., Escobar A., Demaria F. e Acosta A. (2019). Pluriverse: A postdevelopment dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Lasen C. (2022). Biodiversité végétale, valeurs naturelles et sauvegarde du paysage dans le domaine dolomitique, Fl. Medit., 31: 521-544. DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit31SI.521
- Loftus A. (2017). Political Ecology I: Where Is Political Ecology? Progress in Human Geography, 43, 1: 172-182. DOI: 10.1177/0309132517734338
- Martini A., Colombino A. e Zinzani A. (2022). Metodi e metodologie per la ricerca sul campo in geografia. In: Minca C. (a cura di) Appunti di Geografia, Padova: Cedam.
- Messerli B. (2011). Global Change and the World’s Mountains – Where are we coming from, and where are we going to?, Mountain Research and Development, 32, 1: 59-63. DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00118.S1
- Messerli B. e Rey L. (2012). Integrating physical and human geography in the context of mountain development: the Bernese approach. Geographica Helvetica, 67, 1-2: 37-44. DOI: 10.5194/gh-67-38-2012
- Pascolini M. (2008). Le Alpi che cambiano. Nuovi abitanti, nuove culture, nuovi paesaggi. Udine: Forum.
- Perlik M. (2019). The Spatial and Economic Transformation of Mountain Regions – Landscape as Commodity. London and New York: Routledge.
- Perreault T., Bridge G. e McCarthy J. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. London: Routledge Earthscan.
- Pettenati G. (2021). La rinaturalizzazione del cibo in Val Poschiavo: ecologia politica di una ‘valle bio’. Rivista geografica italiana, 128, 2: 138-153. DOI: 10.3280/rgioa2-2021oa12037
- Prezioso M. (2018). Aree interne e loro potenzialità nel panorama italiano e europeo. Introduzione al tema. Geotema, 55, 3: 67-74.
- Raffestin C. (2015). Le Alpi: un presente incerto tra un passato mitico e un futuro da inventare. www.dislivelli.eu/blog/immagini/C.%20Raffestin%20LE%20ALPI.pdf
- Robbins P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Rudaz G. (2011). The Cause of Mountains: The Politics of Promoting a Global Agenda. Global Environmental Politics. 11, 4: 44-63. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00083
- Sarmiento F.O. (2020). Montology manifesto: echoes towards a transdisciplinary science of mountains. Journal of Mountain Science, 17, 10: 2512-2527. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-019-5536-2
- Smith N. (1984). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Varotto M. (2020). Montagne di mezzo. Una nuova geografia. Torino: Einaudi.
- Zinzani A. (2020). L’ecologia politica come campo di riconcettualizzazione socioambientale: governance, conflitto e produzione di spazi politici. Geography Notebooks, 3, 2: 33-50. DOI: 10.7358/gn-2020-002-zinz
- Zinzani A. (2023). The contested environmental futures of the Dolomites: a political ecology of mountains. Geographica Helvetica, 78(2): 295-307. DOI: 10.5194/gh-78-295-2023
- Zinzani A. e Curzi E. (2020). Urban regeneration, forests and socio-environmental conflicts: the case of Prati di Caprara in Bologna (Italy). ACME, 19: 163-186.