Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Opinion section

No. 2 (2023)

Human geography according to artificial intelligence. A small experiment

  • Alberto Vanolo
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa2-2023oa15936
Submitted
maggio 22, 2023
Published
2023-05-30

Abstract

This short commentary aims to stimulate a debate on the limits and possibilities of using artificial intelligence in human and cultural geographies. Specifically, it is considered the potential relationship between artificial intelligence and academic writing, and the idea of geography proposed and reproduced by algorithms. These considerations are developed out of a dialogue on Italian human geographies carried out by the author of this commentary and by the chatbot named ChatGPT.

References

  1. Carraro V. e Wissink B. (2017). The Jerusalems on the map. In: Shaw J. e Graham M., a cura di, Our Digital Rights to the City. Meatspace Press (trad. it.: Il nostro diritto digitale alla città, testo disponibile al sito: http://cittadigitale.openpolis.it, consultato il 2 marzo 2023).
  2. Couclelis H. (1986). Artificial intelligence in geography: Conjectures on the shape of things to come. The Professional Geographer, 38(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1986.00001.x
  3. Gao C.A., Howard F.M., Markov N.S., Dyer E.C., Ramesh S., Luo Y. e Pearson A.T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
  4. Harvey D. (1969). Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold.
  5. Id. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. London: Blackwell (trad. it.: La crisi della modernità. Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1993).
  6. Hayles N.K. (2006). Unfinished work: From cyborg to cognisphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8): 159-166. DOI: 10.1177/0263276406069229
  7. hooks b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge (trad. it.: Imparare a trasgredire. Milano: Meltemi, 2020).
  8. Jameson F. (1981). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Methuen (trad. it.: L’ inconscio politico. Milano: Garzanti, 1990).
  9. McCarthy J., Minsky M.L., Rochester N., Shannon C.E. (1956). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Testo disponibile al sito: http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf (consultato il 2 marzo 2023).
  10. Peters U. (2022). Algorithmic political bias in artificial intelligence systems. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2): 25. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-022- 0512-8
  11. Shields R. (2003). The Virtual. London: Routledge.
  12. Turing A.M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236): 433-460. DOI: 10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
  13. Vanolo A. (2016). Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures, 82: 26-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010
  14. Walker M., Winders, J. e Boamah E.F. (2021). Locating artificial intelligence: a research agenda. Space and Polity, 25(2): 202-219. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2021.1985868

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...