Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Esperienze e pratiche

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Docenti, sviluppo professionale e didattica: riflessioni sulle nuove sfide per l'insegnamento e l'apprendimento

Training of teachers on ICT in Italy: A training proposal following the training model of Castilla y León (Spain)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10813
Submitted
dicembre 1, 2020
Published
2020-12-01

Abstract

This article presents the results obtained in a training experience to improve the self-perception of digital skills of a group of Italian teachers. For its implementation a training in b-learning mode has been designed using free tools that teachers can implement in the classroom. The course saw the participation of 12 teachers from a secondary school in Livorno and the results were very positive as they all had an improvement. The planning, not only focusing on the technological tools, but especially taking into account the activities that would have been carried out in the classroom, is one of the keys to the success of this type of proposal that could also have a positive impact on the pupils. In fact, after the implementation of this training, teachers have in their hands all the tools to be able to activate the virtual classrooms and teach their subject at a distance.

References

  1. Abella, V., López, C., Ortega, N., Sánchez, P., & Lezcano, F. (2011). Implantación de UBUVirtual en la Universidad de Burgos: evaluación y expectativas de uso. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (38), a184. Doi: 10.21556/edutec.2011.38.385.
  2. Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. (2007). Digitally literate teachers in leading edge schools in Norway. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(4), 479-497. Doi: 10.1080/13674580701687864.
  3. Antonio, X., Sans-Martín, J., & Guardia-Olmos Triado, I. (2015). TALIS 2013 Estudio internacional de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Consultato da: https://www.mecd.gob.es/inee/dam/jcr:530e4938-f6c5-446c-937c-4c9df0a37481/talispublicacionessep2014.pdf.
  4. Belloch, C. (2014). Recursos Tecnologicos: TIC. Consultato il 15 maggio 2019, da https://www.uv.es/bellochc/pedagogia/EVA4.wiki?8.
  5. Cabero Almenara, J. (2015). Reflexiones educativas sobre las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC). Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 1, 19-27.
  6. Cabrera, N., & Mayordomo, M. R. (2016). El feedback formativo en la universidad Experiencias con el uso de la tecnología. Barcelona: LMI. Colección Transmedia XXI. Consultato da http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/155454/1/676494.pdf.
  7. Cappa, C., Niceforo, O., & Palomba, D. (2013). La formazione iniziale degli insegnanti in Italia. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (22), 139-163. Doi: 10.5944/reec.22.2013.9327.
  8. Centro de Formación del Profesorado en Idiomas. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://cfpidiomas.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/index.cgi?wid_seccion=1&wid_item=3.
  9. Centro de Recursos y Form. del Profesorado en TIC. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://crfptic.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/.
  10. Centro Superior de Formación del Profesorado JCyL. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/index.cgi?wid_seccion=12&wid_item=50.
  11. Chen, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2016). Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations: Thirty Years of Design Research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288. Doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306.
  12. Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative Research Designs. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264. Doi: 10.1177/0011000006287390.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, G. A. (1997). Research Methodologies and the Doctoral Process. New Directions for Higher Education, 99, 33-46. Doi: 10.1002/he.9903.
  14. De Santo, M., & De Meo, A. (2016). E-training for the clil teacher: E-tutoring and cooperation in a moodle-based community of learning. Journal of ELearning and Knowledge Society, 12(3), 41-49. Doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1152.
  15. Dirección General de Calidad Innovación y Formación del Profesorado. (2011). Modelo de competencias profesionales del profesorado. Consultato da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/upload/Modelo_de_competencias_profesionales_del_Asesor_de_formacion.pdf.
  16. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2017). Resumen del marco DigCompEdu. Consultato da https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/digcompedu_leaflet_esnov2017pdf.pdf.
  17. Falcinelli, F. & Laici, C. (2006). Esperienza di blended learning con Moodle nella SSIS Umbria. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2(2), 241-254.
  18. Farinelli, F. (2010). Competenze e opinioni degli insegnanti sull’introduzione delle TIC nella scuola italiana (No. BIS Working Paper No. 29). Consultato da https://www.fondazioneagnelli.it/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/F._Farinelli__Competenze_e_opinioni_degli_insegnanti_sull_introduzione_delle_TIC_nella_scuola_italiana_-_FGA_WP29.pdf.
  19. Fernández Cruz, F., & Fernández Díaz, M. (2016). Los docentes de la Generación Z y sus competencias digitales. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, XXIV(46), 97-105. Doi: 10.3916/C46-2016-10.
  20. Galliani, L. (2009). Formazione degli insegnanti e competenze nelle tecnologie della comunicazione educativa. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 2-3(2-3), 93-104. Consultato da http://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/312/301.
  21. Gijón González, A. J. (2011). Cómo llevar a cabo la formación permanente del profesorado en en un centro de formación e innovación educativa de Castilla y León: CFEIE de Segovia. Consultato da https://archivos.csif.es/archivos/andalucia/ensenanza/revistas/iee/Numero_47/ANTONIO_J_GIJON_1.pdf.
  22. Gisbert Cervera, M., González Martínez, J., & Esteve Mon, F. M. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Revista Interuniversitaria De Investigación En Tecnología Educativa, 0, 2529-9638. Doi: 10.6018/riite2016/257631.
  23. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536.
  24. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1), 81-112. Doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
  25. Iglesias Alonso, C., & Lezcano Barbero, F. (2012). E-Colaboración entre docentes mediante herramientas TIC. Enseñanza & Teaching, 30(1), 115-135. Consultato da http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/0212-5374/article/viewFile/9300/9592.
  26. Junta de Castilla y León. (2008). Modelo de formación del profesorado de Castilla y León. Consultato da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/upload/Modelo_Formacion_Profesorado_CyL.pdf.
  27. Krumsvik, R. (2008). The emerging digital literacy among teachers in Norway (the story of one digital literate teacher). En R. Kobayashi (Ed.). New Educational Technology (pp. 105-125). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  28. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. Doi: 10.3102/0034654307309921.
  29. Llorente, M. C. (2008). Aspectos fundamentales de la formación delprofes orado en TIC. Revista Pixel_Bit, 31, 121-130.
  30. Marquès, P. (2008). Las competencias digitales de los docentes. Consultato il 24 febbraio 2018, da http://peremarques.pangea.org/competenciasdigitales.htm.
  31. MECD. (2017). Marco Común de competencia Digital Docente. Intef. Consultato da http://aprende.educalab.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017_1020_Marco-Común-de-Competencia-Digital-Docente.pdf.
  32. MECD. (2018). TALIS. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da https://www.mecd.gob.es/inee/evaluaciones-internacionales/talis.html.
  33. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
  34. MIUR (2014). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) Guida alla lectura del Rapporto Internazionale OCSE. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2014/TALIS_Guida_lettura_con_Focus_ITALIA.pdf.
  35. MIUR (2016). Piano per la formazione dei docenti 2016-2019. Consultato da http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2016/Piano_Formazione_3ott.pdf.
  36. MIUR (2018). Talis. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/ministero/talis.
  37. Navarro Asensio, E. (Coord.) (2017). Fundamentos de la investigación y la innovación educativa. Logroño: UNIR Editorial.
  38. ONTSI (2014). Claves para una cultura Tic en la Educación. Consultato da https://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/sites/ontsi/files/las_tic_en_el_aula.pdf.
  39. Pérez Escoda, A., & Rodríguez Conde, M. J. (2016). Evaluación de las competencias digitales autopercibidas del profesorado de Educación Primaria en Castilla y León (España). Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(2), 399-415. Doi: 10.6018/rie.34.2.215121.
  40. Petrucco, C., & Grion, V. (2015). An Exploratory Study on Perceptions and Use of Technology by Novice and Future Teachers. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 6(3), 50-64. Doi: 10.4018/IJDLDC.2015070104.
  41. Puentedura, R. (2009). SAMR: A Contextualized Introduction. As We May Teach: Educational Technology, From Theory Into Practice.
  42. Romero, M. (2020). Herramientas y recursos imprescindibles para la docencia no presencial. Marc Romero | Webinar UOC - YouTube. Consultato il 14 maggio 2020, da https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZUefuJB6yo.
  43. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64. Doi: 10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9.
  44. Sansone, N., & Ligorio, M. (2016). Manuale di didattica blended: il modello della partecipazione collaborativa e costruttiva. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  45. Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13-22. Doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296.
  46. Sansone, N., & Ritella, G. (2020). Formazione insegnanti “aumentata”: integrazione di metodologie e tecnologie al servizio di una didattica sociocostruttivista. Qwerty. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 15(1), 70-88. Doi: 10.30557/QW000023.
  47. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation. En R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 397-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025.
  48. Stewart, J., Antonenko, P., Robinson, J. S., & Mwavita, M. (2013). Intrapersonal Factors Affecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 157-170. Doi: 10.5032/jae.2013.03157.
  49. Wiggins, G. (2012). Feedback for Learning. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10-16.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...