Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi e ricerche

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Docenti, sviluppo professionale e didattica: riflessioni sulle nuove sfide per l'insegnamento e l'apprendimento

Beyond Covid-19: From emergency to professional development perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10802
Submitted
novembre 30, 2020
Published
2020-11-30

Abstract

The University was rapidly pushed into the era of distance teaching and learning (Dad) to cope with the imperative to ensure training for young people even in the lockdown period due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This necessity forced academics to a fast reconversion of traditional teaching into online learning environments for many still unknown and unusual. This has led to significant changes in the approaches and practices in use, favoring choices and solutions often not considered before. This research investigates the experience of distance teaching and learning (Dad), defining the concept, to investigate changes occurred in teaching practice, paying specific attention to the teaching mediation and to assessment, two areas considered foundational and emblematic in teaching-learning processes. 721 academics responded to an online questionnaire designed for this research; from the answers relevant changes in teaching and assessment methods emerged. Together with an increase of interest in the use of online practices, critical elements also emerged, such as the permanence of traditional models and innovation. Overall, the results seem to outline, although to different extents, the need to consider as central the professionalism of academics as a key factor to successfully reconvert the experience of Dad beyond the contingent moment.

References

  1. Agrati, L.S. (2020). Mediazione e insegnamento. Il contributo di Peirce al sapere didattico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Allan, S. (2020). Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2279.
  3. Bonaiuti, G., Calvani, A., Menichetti, L., & Vivanet, G. (2017). Le tecnologie educative. Roma: Carocci.
  4. Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400-413.
  5. Bryson, J.R., & Andres, L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(4), 608-623.
  6. Broadfoot, P. (2007). An introduction to assessment. New York: Continuum.
  7. Butler-Henderson, K, Crawford, J, Rudolph, J, Lalani, K & Sabu, K.M. (2020). COVID-19 in Higher Education Literature Database (CHELD V1): An open access systematic literature review database with coding rules. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(2), pp. 1-6.
  8. Cleveland-Innes, M.F., & Garrison, D.R. (eds.) (2010). An Introduction to Distance Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era. New York: Routledge.
  9. Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. A step-by-step approach. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  10. Damiano, E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-34.
  12. Felisatti, E., & Serbati, A. (Eds) (2015). Apprendere per imparare: formazione e sviluppo professionale dei docenti universitari. Un progetto innovativo dell’Università di Padova. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 14, 323-339.
  13. Felisatti, E., & Serbati, A. (Eds) (2017). Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Frisch, M. (2018). La contre-transposition/Counter-transposition. Internal seminar, Programme Erasmus+, Université Aldo Moro, Bari, Jun 2018, Bari, Italy. hal-02104645.
  15. Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R. & Colucci, E. (2014). E-Learning in European Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: European University Association (EUA).
  17. Grion, V., & Serbati, A. (2019). Valutazione sostenibile e feedback nei contesti universitari. Prospettive emergenti, ricerche e pratiche. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  18. Grion, V., Serbati, A., Sambell, K., & Brown, S. (in press). Valutazione e feedback in DAD in tempo di emergenza: strategie d’azione nei contesti universitari. In P. Limone, G. Toto, & N. Sansone (a cura di). Didattica universitaria a distanza: tra emergenza e futuro. Bari: Progedit.
  19. Hendry, G. (2020) Practical assessment strategies to prevent students from plagiarizing retrieved from: https://www.sydney.edu.au/education-portfolio/ei/news/pdfs/Practical%20assessment%20strategies%20to%20prevent%20students%20from%20plagiarising3.pdf (Novembre 2020).
  20. Huang, R., Tlili, H., Chang, T., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, N., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environment, 7, 19.
  21. Laneve, C. (2005). Analisi di pratica educativa. Metodologie e risultanze della ricerca. Brescia: La Scuola.
  22. Limone, P. (2013). Ambienti di apprendimento e progettazione didattica. Proposte per un sistema educativo transmediale. Roma: Carocci.
  23. Maccario, D. (2017). Pratiche discorsive e mediazione didattica a sostegno dell’apprendimento in Matematica e Italiano nella scuola primaria a partire dal Programma Fenix. Italian Journal of Educational Research, X, special issue, pp. 293-308.
  24. Major, C.H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  25. Moore, M.G., & William A. (2012). Handbook of Distance Education (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
  26. Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135.
  27. Perla, L. (2016). La mediazione ‘plurale’ nel lavoro educativo. In L. Perla, M.G. Riva (Eds), L’agire educativo. Manuale per educatori socio-assistenziali. Brescia: La Scuola.
  28. Perla, L., Agrati, L.S., & Vinci, V. (2019). The ‘Sophisticated’ Knowledge of e-Teacher. Re-shape Digital Resources for Online Courses. In D. Burgos, M. Cimitile, P. Ducange, R. Pecori, P. Picerno, P. Raviolo, & C.M. Stracke. (Eds.) HELMeTO 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1091, Springer, Cham, 3-17.
  29. Perla, L., Scarinci A. & Amati I. (in press). Metamorphosis of space into digital scolarship. A research on hybrid mediation in a university context. In L. Agrati, D. Burgos, L. Perla et al (Eds.). HELMeTO 2020. Bridges and mediation in Higher Distance Education. Second International Workshop, 1092, Springer.
  30. Polanin, J.R., Maynard, B.R., & Dell, N.A. (2017). Overviews in Education Research: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172-203.
  31. Polanin, J.R, Pigott, T.D., Espelage, D.L., & Grotpeter, J.K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and metaanalyses, Res Syn Meth, 10, 330-342.
  32. Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorizing Third Space Literacies. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  33. QUARC_Docente (2017). Linee di indirizzo per lo sviluppo professionale del docente e strategie di valutazione della didattica in Università. Disponibile in: https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Linee-guida-QUARC_docente.pdf. [10/10/2020].
  34. Ranieri, M. (2005). E-learning: modelli e strategie didattiche. Trento: Erickson.
  35. Ranieri, M., & Manca, S. (2013). I social nell'educazione. Basi teoriche, modelli applicativi e linee guida. Trento: Erickson.
  36. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L.& Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigit Sci Educ, 2, 923-945.
  37. Rézeau, J. (2002). Médiation, médiatisation et instruments d’enseignement: du triangle au «carré pédagogique». ASp. la revue du GERAS (35-36), 183-200.
  38. Rivoltella, P.C. (2017). Media education. Brescia: La Scuola.
  39. Rivoltella, P.C. (2020). Nuovi Alfabeti. Educazione e culture nella società postmediale. Brescia: Morcelliana.
  40. Romero-Ivanova, C., Shaughnessy, M., Otto, L., Taylor, E. & Watson, E. (2020). Digital Practices & Applications in a Covid-19 Culture. Higher Education Studies, 10(3).
  41. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  42. Sambell, K., & Brown, S. (2020). The changing landscape of assessment: some possible replacements for unseen, time constrained, face-to-face invigilated exams. Available at: https://sally-brown.net/kay-sambell-and-sally-brown-covid-19-assessment-collection/ (novembre 2020).
  43. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 124-142.
  44. Trentin, G. (2008). La sostenibilità didattico-formativa dell'e-learning: social networking e apprendimento attivo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  45. Yilmaz, R. (2017). Problems Experienced in Evaluating Success And Performance In Distance Education: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 18(1), 39-51.
  46. Wilson, B.G. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional design. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational technology Publications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...