Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

The need for innovation in didactics: inclusion and technologies

V. 9 N. 2 (2018): ESS - The need for innovation in didactics: inclusion and technologies

Progettare in prospettiva ICT-TPCK: Hybrid Solution per lo sviluppo di soft skill in Higher Education

Inviata
4 novembre 2018
Pubblicato
28-01-2019

Abstract

L’adozione di procedure di progettazione integrata ICT-TPCK (Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge) può favorire un efficace ragionamento progettuale dei docenti. La finalità è considerare tutti gli elementi necessari per sviluppare effettiva integrazione di ICT nella didattica in ambienti d’apprendimento HIS (Hybrid Instruction Solution). Lo studio mix-method è stato svolto nell’a.a. 2017-18 coinvolgendo 42 docenti volontari. L’obiettivo era la progettazione e realizzazione di soluzioni ibride onsite/online per valorizzare soft skill specifiche nell’ambito di insegnamenti disciplinari curricolari. E’ stato costruito un questionario strutturato, somministrato in entrata e in uscita, che ha condotto a interessanti riflessioni in merito ad alcune questioni ancora aperte in Higher Education, soprattutto nel contesto nazionale: la qualità e gli obiettivi della formazione dei docenti; l’effettivo superamento della frontalità della didattica; la relazione tra affordance tecnologiche e approcci metodologici.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Ala-Mutka K. (2011). Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC67075_TN.pdf
  2. Angeli C., & Valanides N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1): 154-168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  3. Angeli C., & Valanides N. (2013). Technology mapping: An approach for developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2): 199-221. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FEC.48.2.e
  4. Bonaiuti G. (2005). Strumenti della rete e processo formativo. Firenze: Firenze University Press
  5. Boyatzis R.E., Good D., Massa R. (2012). Emotional, social, and cognitive intelligence and personality as predictor of sales leadership performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19 (2):191-201. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051811435793
  6. Cope B., & Kalantzis M. (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge
  7. De Rossi M. (2017). Questioni metodologiche, soft skill e integrazione delle ICT. Formazione & Insegnamento, XV/1:193-204. doi: 107346/-fei-XV-01-17_15
  8. De Rossi M. & Ferranti C. (2017). Integrare le ICT nella didattica universitaria. Padova: Padova University Press.
  9. De Rossi M., & Trevisan O. (2018). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the literature: how TPCK is defined and implemented in initial teacher education. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1):7-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/988
  10. Dziuban C., Moskal P., Kramer L. & Thompson J. (2013). Student satisfaction with online learning in the presence of ambivalence: Looking for the will-o'-the-wisp. The Internet and Higher Education, 17: 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.08.001
  11. Khosrow-Pour M. (2014). Educational Technology Use and Design for Improved Learning Opportunities. Heshey: Information Science Reference-IGI Global.
  12. Fredrickson B.L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In: K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton e R.E. Quinn (Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship: foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  13. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(3): 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
  14. Harris J., & Hofer M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In: C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009. Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE).
  15. Kaleta R., Skibba K. & Joosten T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In: A. G. Picciano & C.D. Dziuban (Eds), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
  16. La Marca A., Gülbay, E. (2018). Didattica universitaria e sviluppo delle soft skill. Lecce: Pensa Multi Media.
  17. McGee, P. (2014). Blended course design: Where's the pedagogy? International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 6(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2014010103
  18. Messina L. & De Rossi M. (2015). Tecnologie, formazione e didattica. Roma: Carocci.
  19. Mishra P., & Koehler M. J. (2003), Not "What" but "How": Becoming Design-Wise about Educational Technology. In: Y. Zhao (Ed.), What should teacher know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  20. Niess M. L. (2015). Transforming teachers' knowledge: Learning trajectories for advancing teacher education for teaching with technology. In C. Angeli, & N. Valanides, Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK. NY: Springer.
  21. Norman D.A. (1998). The Invisible Computer. Cambridge: MITPress.
  22. Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Blended learning: Research perspectives Vol. 2. New York, NY: Routledge.
  23. Pratt K., Kovatcheva E.P. (2018). Designing Blended, Flexible, and Personalized Learning. In: Voogt J., Knezek G., Christensen R., Lai KW. (Eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Chambridge: Springer International Handbooks of Education.
  24. Redecker C. & Punie Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/european-framework-digital-competence-educators-digcompedu
  26. Shea P. (2007). Towards A Conceptual Framework for Learning in Blended Environments. In: A. Picciano & C. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning. Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
  27. Teddlie C., & Tashakkori A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  28. Trentin G., Bocconi S. (2015). Didattica ibrida e insegnamento universitario: linee guida per una progettazione efficace. Italian Journal of Educational Research, VIII: 27-42. ISSN 2038-9744
  29. Zhou J. & George J.M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: the role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14: 545-569. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00051-1

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...