Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli/Articles

V. 16 N. 1 (2025): La pedagogia come scienza fra teoria ed empiria

Ripensare il ruolo della ricerca educativa nei sistemi complessi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2025oa20332
Inviata
5 giugno 2025
Pubblicato
26-06-2025

Abstract

Il contributo esplora l’educazione come sistema complesso sul piano sia epistemico sia sistemico e approfondisce le implicazioni teoriche e metodologiche per la ricerca educativa. Introduce il concetto di sistemi simplex come strutture semplificanti utilizzate dalle comunità agenti – ricercatori, insegnanti, decisori politici – per agire entro la complessità educativa. In tale prospettiva, il testo presenta le tensioni intra- e intercomunitarie che emergono nei processi di innovazione, valutazione e trasferimento della ricerca. Particolare attenzione è dedicata alle differenze tra modelli di causalità, ai limiti della variabilità interindividuale come fonte prevalente di evidenze e alle difficoltà di comunicazione tra comunità di soggetti agenti. In chiusura, propone una riflessione sulla responsabilità epistemologica della ricerca nel costruire strumenti condivisibili, individuando in ciò l’eredità metodologica di Raymond Buyse.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Abbona F., Del Re G., Monaco G. (a cura di) (2008). Complessità dinamica dei processi educativi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Adelman H.S., & Taylor L. (2003). On Sustainability of Project Innovations as Systemic Change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14: 1-25.
  3. Bandura A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives On Psychological Science, 13(2): 130-136.
  4. Bassano D., Van Geert P. (2007). Modeling Continuity and Discontinuity in Utterance Length: A Quantitative Approach to Changes, Transitions and Intraindividual Variability in Early Grammatical Development. Developmental Science, 10(5): 588‐612.
  5. Berthoz A. (2012). Simplexity: Simplifying Principles for a Complex World. New Haven (Ct): Yale University Press.
  6. Biesta G. (2007). Bridging the Gap between Educational Research and Educational Practice: The Need for Critical Distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3): 295-301.
  7. Bocchi G., Ceruti M. (a cura di) (2007). La sfida della complessità. Milano: Bruno Mondadori (2° ed.).
  8. Bottani N. (2009). Il difficile rapporto fra politica e ricerca scientifica sui sistemi scolastici. FGA Working Paper, 17.
  9. Bronfenbrenner U., Morris P.A. (2006). The Bioecology Model of Human Development. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol.1: Theoretical Models of Human Development (6th ed., pp. 783‐828). New York: Wiley.
  10. Calonghi L. (a cura di) (1993). Nel bosco di Chirone: contributi per l’identificazione della ricerca didattica. Napoli: Tecnodid.
  11. Durlak J.A., & DuPre E.P. (2008). Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41: 327-50.
  12. Davis B., Sumara D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  13. Frenken K. (2006). Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory. Cheltenham (UK)/Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
  14. Goldspink C. (2007a). Rethinking Educational Reform: A Loosely Coupled and Complex Systems Perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1): 27‐50.
  15. Goldspink C. (2007b). Transforming Education: Evidential support for a Complex Systems Approach E:CO, 9(1‐2): 77‐92.
  16. Goleman D., Senge P.M. (2015). The Triple Focus: A New Approach to Education. Florence: More Than Sound.
  17. Gore J.M. & Gitlin A.D. (2004) [Re]Visoning the Academic-Teacher Divide: Power and Knowledge in the Educational Community. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(1): 35-58.
  18. Guastello S.J., Gregson R. (Eds.) (2011). Nonlinear Dynamical System Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using Real Data. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis.
  19. Johnson S. (2011). Dove nascono le grandi idee. Milano: Rizzoli.
  20. Jőrg T. (2011). New Thinking in Complexity for the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Generative, Transdisciplinary Approach. New York: Springer.
  21. Jőrg T., Davis B., Nickmans G. (2007). Towards a New, Complexity Science of Learn-ing and Education. Educational Research Review, 2: 145‐156.
  22. Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D. a, Ferrer‐I‐Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer‐Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Scaling Laws in Cognitive Sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5): 223-232.
  23. Kluger J. (2008). Simplexity: Why Simple Things Become Complex (and How Com-plex Things Can Be Made Simple). New York: Hyperion.
  24. Koopmans M. (2014). Change, Self‐organization and the Search for Causality in Educational Research and Practice. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(1): 20-39.
  25. Mehl M.R. & Conner T. S. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. New York: The Guilford Press.
  26. Molenaar M., Campbell, C.G. (2009). The New Person‐specific Paradigm in Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2): 112-117.
  27. Stamovlasis D. (2006). The Nonlinear Dynamical Hypothesis in Science Education Problem Solving: A Catastrophe Theory Approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10(1): 37‐70.
  28. Steenbeek H., Jansen L., van Geert P. (2012). Scaffolding Dynamics and The Emer-gence of Problematic Learning Trajectories. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1): 64‐75.
  29. Steenbeek H., van Geert P. (2013). The Emergence of Learning‐Teaching Trajectories in Education: A Complex Dynamic Systems Approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17(2): 233‐267.
  30. Steenbeek H. & van Geert P. (2020). Education and Development as Complex Dynamic Agent Systems: How Theory Informs Methodology. In M.F. Mascolo & T.R. Bidell (Eds.), Handbook of Integrative Developmental Science: Essays in Honor of Kurt W. Fischer (pp. 162-188). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  31. Van Der Steen S., Steenbeek H., Van Dijk M., van Geert, P. (2014). A Process Approach to Children’s Understanding of Scientific Concepts: A Longitudinal Case Study. Learning and Individual Differences, 30: 84‐91.
  32. Van Geert P., Steenbeek H. (2014). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly? The Dynamic Interplay Between Educational Practice, Policy, and Research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2: 22-39.
  33. Van Geert P., van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on Variability: New Tools to Study Intra‐individual Variability in Developmental Data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25: 340‐375.
  34. Viganò R. (2024). Dal dito alla luna. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 33: 8-9.
  35. Weiss C.H. (2007). The Role of Education Research: Commentary. Can We Influence Education Reform Through Research?. In S. Fuhrman, D.K. Cohen, F. Mosher (Eds.). The State of Education Policy Research (pp. 281-287). New York: Routledge.
  36. Weisstein E.W. (1999). CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. Boca Raton‐New York: CRC Press.
  37. West G. (2018). Scala. Milano: Mondadori.
  38. Wetzels A., Steenbeek H., van Geert P. (2016). A Complexity Approach to Investigating the Effectiveness of an Intervention for Lower Grade Teachers on Teaching Science. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1): 81-104.
  39. Zanniello G. (2014). L’avvio della ricerca empirica in campo educativo in Italia: il contributo di Calonghi e Visalberghi. ECPS Journal, 9: 185-201.
  40. Zanniello G. (2015). Nascita e sviluppo della ricerca empirica in campo didattico in Italia. Form@re, 3: 11-21.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...