Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito

Articoli/Articles

V. 16 N. 1 (2025): La pedagogia come scienza fra teoria ed empiria

Fare ricerca pedagogica con studenti trans*. Una proposta metodologica trans*-affermativa e trans*-posizionata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2025oa19561
Inviata
3 marzo 2025
Pubblicato
26-06-2025

Abstract

L’articolo illustra l’impostazione metodologica trans*-affermativa e trans*-posizionata adottata in una ricerca con studenti trans* nella scuola secondaria di secondo grado italiana. L’approccio, fondato sui transgender studies, elabora una proposta che valorizza i saperi esperienziali delle soggettività trans*, evitando di replicare forme di violenza epistemica e discorsiva. L’articolo descrive le scelte metodologiche adottate, tra cui autoriflessività del ricercatore, approccio narrativo alla ricerca e intervista biografica, evidenziando come queste strategie contribuiscano a una ricerca pedagogica eticamente sensibile e rispettosa dellз persone trans* partecipanti. L’obiettivo è offrire un contributo alla riflessione metodologica ed etica nella ricerca pedagogica, proponendo un modello trasferibile ad altri studi con persone trans*.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Allen R. E. S. and Wiles J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2): 149-165. Doi: 10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746.
  2. Anderson, K. and Jack D. C. (1991). Learning to Listen: Interview Techniques and Analyses. In: Gluck S. B. e Patai D., editors, Womens Words. The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.
  3. Austin A. (2016). “There I am”: A Grounded Theory Study of Young Adults Navigating a Transgender or Gender Nonconforming Identity within a Context of Oppression and Invisibility. Sex Roles, 75(5-6): 215-230. Doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0600-7.
  4. Bertrand M., Brooks M. D. and Domínguez A. D. (2023). Challenging Adultism: Centering Youth as Educational Decision Makers. Urban Education, 58(10): 2570-2597. Doi: 10.1177/0042085920959135.
  5. Bichi R. (2002). L’intervista biografica: Una proposta metodologica. Milano: Vita e pensiero.
  6. Bichi R. (2017). La conduzione delle interviste nella ricerca sociale. Roma: Carocci.
  7. Bourelly R. (2023). The Challenges and Experiences of Transgender Students in Italian High Schools: Alias Career and Normalisation. Sapienza Università di Roma: DiSSE Working Papers. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://web.uniroma1.it/disse/sites/default/files/DISSE_Bourelly_wp12_2023.pdf.
  8. Burgio G. (2008). Mezzi maschi. Gli adolescenti gay dell’Italia meridionale. Una ricerca etnopedagogica. Milano: Mimesis.
  9. Burgio G. e Lopez A. G., a cura di (2023). La pedagogia di genere. Percorsi di ricerca contemporanei. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Cambi F., Certini R. e Nesti R. (2010). Dimensioni della pedagogia sociale. Roma: Carocci.
  11. Connelly M. F. and Clandinin D. J. (1990). Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5): 2-14.
  12. Demetrio D. (2012). Educare è narrare: Le teorie, le pratiche, la pratica. Milano: Mimesis.
  13. Eisenberg M. E., Gower A. L., McMorris B. J., Rider G. N., Shea G. and Coleman E. (2017). Risk and Protective Factors in the Lives of Transgender/Gender Noncon-forming Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(4): 521-526. Doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.014.
  14. Ferguson J. (2015). Queering Methodologies: Challenging Scientific Constraint in the Appreciation of Queer and Trans Subjects. The Qualitative Report, 8(13): 1-13. Doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1539.
  15. Finlay L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4): 531-545. Doi: 10.1177/104973202129120052.
  16. Gill-Peterson J. (2018). Histories of the Transgender Child. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Goodson I. and Gill S. (2011). Narrative pedagogy: Life history and learning. New York: Peter Lang.
  18. Halberstam J. (2018). Trans*. A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability. Oakland: University of California Press.
  19. Hall S. F. (2021). Panoptical Time, Cissexism, and Heterosexism: How Discourses of Adultism Discipline Queer and Trans Youth. Feminist Formations, 33(2): 283-312. Doi: 10.1353/ff.2021.0035.
  20. Haraway D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575-599. Doi: 10.2307/3178066.
  21. Horton C. (2020). Thriving or Surviving? Raising Our Ambition for Trans Children in Primary and Secondary Schools. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. Doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00067.
  22. Jones T., Smith E., Ward R., Dixon J., Hillier L. and Mitchell A. (2016). School experiences of transgender and gender diverse students in Australia. Sex Education, 16(2): 156-171. Doi: 10.1080/14681811.2015.1080678.
  23. Keenan H. B. (2022). Methodology as Pedagogy: Trans Lives, Social Science, and the Possibilities of Education Research. Educational Researcher, 51(5): 307-314. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X211065740.
  24. Kennedy N. (2013). Cultural Cisgenderism: Consequences of the imperceptible. Psychology of Women Section Review, 15(2): 3-11. Doi: 10.53841/bpspow.2013.15.2.3.
  25. Lorusso M. M., Compare C., Cecconi A. and Albanesi C. (2024). Navigating secondary school: A perspective from trans and non‐binary activists. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(3): e2797. Doi: 10.1002/casp.2797.
  26. Manera M. (2024). Fa differenza. Comunicazione corretta e lotta di classe. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
  27. Mariotto M., Albanesi C. and Lorusso M. M. (2024). Encountering transgender and gender-expansive children in school: Exploring parents’ and teachers’ practices through the lens of cisgenderism and adultism. Children and Youth Services Review, 164, 107819. Doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107819.
  28. Mayo C. (2017). Queer and Trans Youth, Relational Subjectivity, and Uncertain Possibilities: Challenging Research in Complicated Contexts. Educational Researcher, 46(9): 530-538. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X17738737.
  29. Mayo C. and Blackburn M. V., editors (2020). Queer, Trans, and Intersectional Theory in Educational Practice. Student, Teacher, and Community Experiences. New York: Routledge.
  30. McBride R.-S. (2021). A literature review of the secondary school experiences of trans youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 18(2): 103-134. Doi: 10.1080/19361653.2020.1727815.
  31. Merrill B. and West L. (2009). Using Biographical Methods in Social Research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
  32. Poggio B. (2004). Mi racconti una storia? Il metodo narrativo nelle scienze sociali. Roma: Carocci.
  33. Rooke A. (2009). Queer in the Field: On Emotions, Temporality, and Performativity in Ethnography. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 13(2): 149-160. Doi: 10.1080/10894160802695338.
  34. Rosati F., Lorusso M. M., Pistella J., Anzani A., Di Giannantonio B., Mirabella M. and Baiocco R. (2024). Nonbinary people living in a binary world: Minority stress in public and gendered places. International Journal of Transgender Health, 1-18. Doi: 10.1080/26895269.2024.2338152.
  35. Santambrogio A. (2022). Scuole come dispositivi di genere binari e cisnormativi. Un’analisi della letteratura pedagogica sull’esperienza scolastica dellз adolescenti trans*. Pedagogia delle differenze - Bollettino della fondazione «Vito Fazio-Allmayer», 51(2): 283-300.
  36. Shelton S. A. and Lester A. O. S. (2018). Finding possibilities in the impossible: A cele-bratory narrative of trans youth experiences in the Southeastern USA. Sex Education, 18(4): 391-405. Doi: 10.1080/14681811.2017.1421920.
  37. Slovin L. (2020). What grade are you in? On being a non-binary researcher. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(3): 225-241. Doi: 10.1080/03626784.2020.1754730.
  38. Squire C. (2008). Approaches to Narrative Research. London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/419/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-009.pdf.
  39. Steele K. and Nicholson J. (2020). Radically Listening to Transgender Children. Creating Epistemic Justice through Critical Reflection and Resistant Imaginations. London: Lexington Books.
  40. Stryker S. (2006). (De)subjugated knowledges: An introduction to transgender studies. In: Stryker S. and Whittle S., editors, The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
  41. Stryker S. (2023). Storia transgender: Radici di una rivoluzione. Milano: Luiss University Press.
  42. Stryker S. and Whittle S., editors (2006). The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
  43. Tolomelli A. (2021). Adolescence does not exist. Guidelines for a Pedagogical Problematicism of adolescence. Encyclopaideia, 25(61): 11-19. Doi: 10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/12714.
  44. Valentine D. (2007). Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Durham: Duke University Press.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...