Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022): Special Pedagogy and Special Didactics for an innovative school and an inclusive education

Academic Activism for Inclusion: The case study of the UNESCO Chair of Inclusion in Higher Education & CINESUP Foundation (Chile)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2022oa14529
Submitted
August 31, 2022
Published
2022-12-20

Abstract

The number of students with disabilities enrolled in Italian and foreign universities is constantly increasing. We cannot overlook the fact that this phenomenon presents some criticalities that do not always result in the active participation of the most vulnerable in university life. The present work aims to provide a relevant testimony by the author in the Latin American academic context. In particular, the article focuses on the experience of academic activism that has been taking place in Chile for thirty years and, specifically, at the UNESCO Chair Inclusion in the Higher Education (University of Santiago de Chile USACH) and through the CINESUP Foundation (International Center for Equity and Inclusion in Higher Education), on the thought of Prof. Francisco Javier Gil (1951-2021) whose objectives are: the equitable and permanent access of students with excellent academic performance and students with disabilities to university higher education.

References

  1. Albrecht G.L., ed. (1976). The Sociology of Physical Disability and Rehabilitation. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
  2. Andrews F. (1986). Research on the Quality of Life. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Resarch, University of Michigan.
  3. Balza I. (2011). Crítica feminista de la discapacidad: El monstruo como figura de la vulnerabilidad y exclusión. DILEMATA, 3(7): 57-76.
  4. Barnes C. (1991). Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: a Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst.
  5. Barnes C., and Mercer G. (2010). Exploring Disability. Cambridge: Polity.
  6. Beck U. and Beck E. (2003). La individualización. Barcelona: Paidos.
  7. Benedetti M. (1974). Poemas de Otros. Buenos Aires: Editorial Alfa.
  8. Bernasconi A. (2008). Is there a Latin American model of the university?. Comparative Education Review, 52(1): 27-52. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Doi: 10.1086/524305.
  9. Blanco R. (2006) Inclusión en la educación superior. In Caminos para la inclusión en la educación superior en Chile, 37-40. Santiago: Fundación Equitas.
  10. Blaxter M. (1976). The Meaning of Disability: A Sociological Study of Impairment. Sociology of Social and Medical Care Series. Journal of Social Policy, 6(3): 378-380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/S0047279400006930.
  11. Bourdieu P. (1998). Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  12. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. (1995). Respuestas por una antropología reflexiva. México D.F.: Grijalbo.
  13. Briones B. J. (2016). Inclusión: construyendo una universidad sin barreras. In Aprendizajes del Programa de Acceso Inclusivo, Equidad y Permanencia 2012-2015. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
  14. Clear M. (2000). Promises, Promises: Disability and Terms of Inclusion. Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press.
  15. Constitution of the Republic of Chile (1980). Supreme Decree No. 100. Last edit with Law 20516. 2011. Fixed the refunded, Coordinated and Systematized text of the Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile. Ministry General Secretariat of the Presidency. http://www.leychile.cl/N?i=242302&f=2011-07-11&p=.
  16. Constitutzione della Repubblica Italiana (1948). Gazzetta Ufficiale (GUn.298 del 27-12-1947) http://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:costituzione:1947-12-27!vig=.
  17. Convencion Constitutional Politica Republica de Chile Propuesta (4 Julio 2022). https://www.chileconvencion.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Texto-CPR-2022-entregado-al-Pdte-y-publicado-en-la-web-el-4-de-julio.pdf.
  18. CRES (2018). Final Report. III Conferencia regional de Educación Superior para América Latina y el Caribe. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: Argentina, 14 de junio de 2018.
  19. Crow L. (1996). Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability. In Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, 55-73. Leeds: Disability Press.
  20. Cummins, R. A. (1996b). Assessing quality of life. In R.L. Schalock, Quality of life. Volume I: Conceptualization and measurement. Whashington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
  21. Davila L.O. (2004). Adolescencia y juventud: de las nociones a los abordajes. Ultima década, 12(21): 83-104. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-22362004000200004.
  22. Delanty G. (2000). The University in the Knowledge Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  23. Dubet F. (2004). L’école des chances. Qu’est-ce qu’une école juste?. France: Editions du Seuil et La République des Idées.
  24. Ebersold S. (2014). Enseignement supérieur, orchestration de l’accessibilité et handicap. In Les processus discriminatoires des politiques du handicap. Grenoble: PUG.
  25. Ebersold S. (2016). Youth with disabilities and transition to adulthood. In Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts and communities. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn Belgium: Garant.
  26. Ebersold S. and Cabral L.S.A. (2016). Enseignement supérieur, orchestration de l’accessibilité et stratégies d’accompagnement. Education et francophonie, 44: 134-153. Doi: 10.7202/1036176ar.
  27. Echeita G. (2008). Inclusión y exclusión educativa: voz y quebranto. Revista electrónica Iberoamericana Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 6(2): 9-18.
  28. Esposito R. (1998). Communitas. Origine e destino della comunità Torino: Einaudi.
  29. Ferreyra M., Avitable C., Botero J., Haimovich F. and Urzua S. (2017). At a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and Caribbean. Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  30. Finkelstein V. (1980). Attitudes and Disability: Issues for Discussions. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
  31. Formica C. (2016). Terza missione. Parametro di qualità del sistema universitario. Napoli: Giapeto.
  32. Foucault M. (1975). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York, NY: Vantage.
  33. Gil F.J. and Del Canto C. (2012). The Case of Propedéutico Program at Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH). Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 49(2): 65-83. Doi: 10.7764/PEL.49.2.2012.6.
  34. Gil F.J., Orellana M., and Moreno K. (2016). Revisión del proceso histórico sobre equidad en la educación superior chilena. In Equidad en la Educación Superior: Desafíos y proyecciones en la experiencia comparada, 137-151. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones El Desconcierto.
  35. Gil F.J., González A., Orellana M. Moreno K. and Rahmer B. (2018). Crítica y Acciones para un acceso equitativo y permanencia efectiva a la educación superior universitaria. El rol de las instituciones de educación superior en contexto diversos. In Educacion Superior en America Latina y el Caribe. Estudios retrospectivos y proyecciones, 238- 264. Cordoba: CRES/UNESCO.
  36. Goffman E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  37. González A. (2016). Aspirar a una universidad selectiva y concretar las aspiraciones: factores determinantes. Calidad en la Education. Santiago de Chile: Consejo Nacional de Educación.
  38. Goodley D. (2014). Dis/ability Studies. Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London, New York: Routledge.
  39. Gramsci A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: New Left.
  40. Hahn H. (2002). Academic Debates and Political Advocacy: The US Disability Movement. In Disability Studies Today, 162-189. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  41. Hasler F. (1993). Developments in the Disabled People’s Movement. In Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, 278-284. London: Sage in association with the Open University.
  42. Hunt P. (1966). Stigma: The Experience of Disability. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
  43. IESALC-UNESCO (2005). Estudio sobre la repitencia y deserción en la educación superior chilena. Santiago de Chile: Instituto Internacional para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe.
  44. Karsz S. (2004). La exclusión: bordeando sus fronteras: definiciones y matices. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  45. Konur O. (2006). Teaching disabled students in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(11): 351-363. Doi: 10.1080/13562510600680871.
  46. Lapierre M. (2020). Análisis del sistema de salud chileno desde una perspectiva de justicia, en el marco del movimiento social del 18 de Octubre de 2019 en Chile. Revista Izquierdas, 49: 4384-4403.
  47. Lenoir R. (1974). Les Exclus: un français sur dix. Paris: Seuil.
  48. Lévinas E. (1994). Outside the Subject. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  49. Ley n. 20422 (2016). Normas sobre Igualdad de Oportunidades e Inclusión Social de Persona con Discapacidad. Ministerio de Planificación. Gobierno de Chile. https://www.leychile.cl/N?i=1010903&f=2016-06-28.
  50. Mattei U. (2011). Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Bari: Laterza.
  51. Meller P. (2010). Carreras Universitarias: Rentabilidad, Selectividad y Discriminación. Santiago de Chile: Uqbarr.
  52. Moliterni P. (2011). Studiare all’università. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  53. National Disability Survey (2015). Ministry of Social Development. Government of Chile https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/meetings/2017/new-york--disability-egm/Session%204/Chile.pdf.
  54. Network for the Liberation of People with Disabilities (1981). The Manifest https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/LNPD-cold-issue-1-part-1.pdf.
  55. OECD (2011). Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in Tertiary Education and Employment education and training policy. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/9111011e.pdf.
  56. Oliver M. (1998). ¿Una sociología de la discapacidad o una sociología discapacitada?. In Discapacidad y sociedad, 34-58. Madrid: Morata.
  57. Oliver M. and Barnes C. (2012). The New Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.
  58. Orellana M., Moreno K. and Gil F.J. (2015). Inclusión a la universidad de estudiantes meritorios en situación de vulnerabilidad social. Santiago de Chile: Oficina Regional de Educacion para America Latina y el Caribe (OREALC/UNESCO).
  59. Parsons T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.
  60. Pedreira A. (1934). Insularismo. Puerto Rico: Editorial EDIL.
  61. Quatera I. (2017). Inclusione come strategia per il bene comune. Rivista MeTis Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni, 7(2): 366-381. Bari: Progedit.
  62. Rahmer B., Miranda R., and Gil F.J. (2013). Programa de Acceso Inclusivo, Equidad y Permanencia de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile: una política universitaria de acción afirmativa. Plenary presentation at 3rd Latin American Conference on Abandonment in Higher Education (III-CLABES). Mexico D.F., Mexico, 13, 14 and 15th November.
  63. Ramirez J. [CLACSO TV] (6 de abril de 2021). Revuelta popular y proceso constituyente en Chile: debates anticapacitistas desde movimiento social [Archivo de Video. Minute 15:15]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nh8venke2ws.
  64. Robeyns I. (2017). Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
  65. Rosato A. and Vain V. (2005). Antropología y construcción de alteridades. In La construction social de la normalidad, 40-51. Buenos Aires: Noveduc.
  66. Roy I. B. and Schippers A. (2016). Special issue: Quality of life and family quality of life: Recent developments in research and application. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(4): 277-278. Doi: 10.3109/13668250.2016.1234958.
  67. Scotch R. K. (1988). Disability as the Basis for a Social Movement: Advocacy and the Politics of Definition. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1): 159-72. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02055.x.
  68. SENADIS (2016). Report Discapacidad en Chile. Pasos hacia un modelo integral del funcionamiento humano. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. Gobierno de Chile.
  69. Shakespeare T. and Watson N. (2002). The Social Model of Disability: An Outmoded Ideology. Research in Social Science and Disability, (2): 9-28.
  70. Silver H. (1995). Reconceptualizing social disadvantage: three paradigms of social exclusion. In Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses, 57-80. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  71. Siordia C. (2016). Self-Care and Mobility Disability at Mid-Life in Lucky Few, Early- and Late-Baby Boom Birth-Cohorts. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, (9)2: 216-228. School of Community Health Sciences. Las Vegas: University of Nevada.
  72. Squella A. (2021). Dignidad. Valparaíso: Universidad de Valparaíso.
  73. Sutherland A.T. (1981). Disabled We Stand. London: Souvenir.
  74. Townsend R. M. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  75. UNESCO (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for All. Paris: Unesco.
  76. UNESCO (2015). Sustainable Development Goal (SDGs) Agenda for Development 2030. Declaration and Framework of Action for the realization of the Sustainable Development Objective 4. Paris: UNESCO.
  77. United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). New York http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
  78. United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 217 A (III). https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html.
  79. UPIAS (1976). Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: UPIAS.
  80. Walker M. and Unterhalter E. (2007). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  81. WHO (2011). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...