Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): Pedagogy as a science between theory and empiricism

Towards a “practice-based evidence” approach. The relational expertise model to promote public engagement between research and educational practice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2025oa19571
Submitted
marzo 4, 2025
Published
2025-06-26

Abstract

In this contribution, it is proposed a methodological reflection about the public engagement of university researchers, considered as an emergent field of inquiry in the educational sciences. To promote effective and lasting University-Community partnership, it is proposed the “Relational expertise” model as respectful of the professional competencies in the educational services. Relational expertise relies on the sociocultural theory of learning, and it requires the identification of a shared unit of analysis as the point of reference for discussion about daily educational practices, to promote an increased participation in social life. Accordingly, a methodological approach is worked out to gather evidence that makes visible the complexity of the educational interactions in the different contexts of daily practices, where the control of variables is impossible. The practice-based approach is alternative to the “evidence-based policy and practice” since the former gathers evidence saturated with the contextual realities that mediate professional expertise.

A case study of University-Community engagement is presented to point out the educational interactions in the existing conditions of an after-school practice as a shared unit of analysis, as well as the nature of evidence generated.

References

  1. ANVUR (Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca) (2018). Linee guida per la compilazione della Scheda Unica Annuale Terza Missione e Impatto Sociale per le Università (SUA-TM 2018). -- https://www.anvur.it/it/assicurazione-della-qualita/istituzioni-e-sedi/universita/accreditamento-periodico [last access 3rd March 2025].
  2. Cole M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Davies B. (2021). ‘Youth Work: A Manifesto revisited – At the time of Covid and beyond’, Youth and Policy, -- https://www.youthandpolicy.org/articles/youth-work-manifesto-revisited-2021/ [accessed 21 March 2024].
  4. de St Croix T. (2018). Youth work, performativity and the new youth impact agenda: getting paid for numbers?. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3): 414-438. Doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1372637.
  5. Edwards A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner. The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
  6. Edwards A., Lunt I. & Stamou E. (2010) Inter-professional Work and Expertise: New Roles at the Boundaries of Schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1): 27-45. Doi:10.1080/01411920902834134.
  7. Eraut M. (2004). Practice-based evidence. In: G. Thomas and R. Pring (eds). Evidence-based Practice in Education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  8. Erickson F. (2006). Studying side by side: Collaborative action ethnography in educational research. In: G. Spindler and L. Hammond (eds). Innovations in Educational Ethnography. Theory, Methods, and Results. New York: Psychology Press.
  9. Gegenfurtner A., Gruber H., Lehtinen H., & Säljö R. (2024). Horizontal Transition of Expertise. Frontline Learning Research. 12(3): 20-44 Doi: 10.14786/flr.v12i3.543.
  10. Oakley A. (2007). Evidence-informed policy and practice: challenges for social sciences. In: M. Hammersley (ed). Educational Research and Evidence-based Practice, London: Sage in collaboration with The Open University.
  11. Oancea A., Florez Petour T. and Atkinson J. (2017). Qualitative network analysis tools for the configurative articulation of cultural value and impact from research. Research Evaluation, 26(4): 302-315. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvx014.
  12. Pring R. (2000). Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Continuum.
  13. Pring R. (2004). Conclusion. In: G. Thomas and R. Pring (eds). Evidence-based Practice in Education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  14. Säljö R. (2009). Learning, Theories of Learning, and Units of Analysis in Research. Educational Psychologist, 44(3): 202-208. Doi: 10.1080/00461520903029030.
  15. Skilling K. and Stylianides G.J. (2020). Using vignettes in educational research: a framework for vignette construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5): 541-556. Doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2019.1704243.
  16. Slavin R. E. (2008). What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1): 5-14. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X08314117.
  17. Stamou E., Oancea A., Edwards A. (2022). Knowledge exchange in the social sciences. Knowledge ecosystems, networks, and the social enterprising of research. In: M. Tamboukou (ed). Thinking with Stephen J. Ball. Lines of Flight in Education. London: Routledge.
  18. United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. -- https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf [last access 3rd March 2025].
  19. Wertsch J.V. (1996). Mind As Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  20. Wertsch J.V. (2007). Mediation. In: H. Daniels, M. Cole, and J.V. Wertsch (eds). The Cambridge Companion of Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. What Works Network (2014). What works. Evidence for Decision Makers, www.gov.uk/what-works-network). [accessed: 18 April 2024].
  22. Zimmerman B.J. (2012). Development and Adaptation of Expertise. The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs. In: K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich and R.R. Hoffman (eds). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...