Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Special Education, Third Mission and Social Impact: Reflections and practices for an inclusive community

The Complex Issue of Transition to Adult Life for Youth with Intellectual Disabilities: Views from the Parents

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2024oa17433
Submitted
marzo 6, 2024
Published
2024-06-24

Abstract

Transitions, or the obligatory passages between the developmental phases of life, open up an important question mark for young people with intellectual disabilities (ID) who are preparing to finish secondary school. The dilemma regarding the Life Project opens up, to this end the rights affirmed at international and national levels must be guaranteed through coordinated services which must be present and organized with a planning perspective. The objectives of this research are to detect the needs of parents and young adults with ID during and after the transition to adulthood, analyzing their experiences and the factors that impact to it. The results show that the transition period is characterized by disorientation, lack of knowledge and information, lack of trained personnel and job placement is still a mirage for most. Parental agency represents a turning point but sometimes it is not enough. Unfortunately, it is often "luck" that determines the fate of young people with ID. From the analysis of families' needs, reflections emerge for the construction of guidance tools to support young people with ID and their families. 

References

  1. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support. Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Bronfenbrenner U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Na-ture and Design. Harvard University Press (trad. it. Ecologia dello sviluppo umano. Bologna: il Mulino, 1986).
  3. Braun V., Clarke V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (re-flexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3): 328-352. Doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
  4. Braun V., Clarke V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4): 589-597. Doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  5. Cottini L., Fedeli D., Zorzi S. (2016). Qualità della vita nella disabilità adulta. Per-corsi, servizi e strumenti psicoeducativi. Trento: Erickson.
  6. Decreto legislativo recante definizione della condizione di disabilità, della valutazione di base, di accomodamento ragionevole, della valutazione multidimensionale per l’elaborazione e attuazione del progetto di vita individuale personalizzato e partecipato, 2024. Testo disponibile in: https://magazine.igeacps.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/decreto-disabilita-2024.pdf (consultato il 01.05.2024).
  7. Decreto legislativo n. 66/2017 “Norme per la promozione dell’inclusione scolastica degli alunni con disabilità”. Testo disponibile in: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2017/05/16/17G00074/sg (consultato il 21.02.2024).
  8. Ford D.H., Lerner R.M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage (trad. it.: Teoria dei sistemi evolutivi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1995).
  9. Francis G.L., Regester A., Reed A.S. (2019). Barriers and Supports to Parent Involvement and Collaboration During Transition to Adulthood. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(4): 235-245. Doi: 10.1177/2165143418813912.
  10. Franklin M.S., Beyer L.N., Brotkin S. M., Maslow G.R., Pollock M.D., Docherty S.L. (2019). Health care transition for adolescent and young adults with intellectual disability: Views from the parents. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 47: 148-158. Doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.05.008.
  11. Gauthier-Boudreault C., Beaudoin A., Gallagher F., Couture M. (2019). Scoping review of social participation of individuals with profound intellectual disability in adulthood: What can I do once I finish school?. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(2): 248-260. Doi: 10.3109/13668250.2017.1310810.
  12. Gauthier-Boudreault C., Gallagher F., Couture M. (2017). Specific needs of families of young adults with profound intellectual disability during and after transition to adulthood: What are we missing?. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 66: 16-26. Doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.05.001.
  13. Heller T., Gibbons H. M., Fisher D. (2015). Caregiving and family support interventions: Crossing networks of aging and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 53(5): 329-345. Doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.5.329.
  14. Lascioli A., Traina I. (2022). Special education and development of employment and independent living skills. Education Sciences & Society - Open Access, 13(2): 144-160. Doi: 10.3280/ess2-2022oa14535.
  15. Legge 104/1992, “Legge-quadro per l’assistenza, l’integrazione sociale e i diritti delle persone handicappate”. Disponibile in: https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1992-02-05;104!vig= (consultato il 20.02.2024).
  16. Legge 328/2000, “Legge quadro per la realizzazione del sistema integrato di interventi e servizi sociali”. Testo disponibile alla pagina: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2000/11/13/000G0369/sg (consultato il 21.02.2024).
  17. Legge 112/2016 “Disposizioni in materia di assistenza in favore delle persone con disabilità grave prive di sostegno familiare”. Testo disponibile alla pagina: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2016/06/24/16G00125/sg (consultato il 21.02.2024).
  18. Legge regionale 14 novembre 2022, n. 16. “Interventi a favore delle persone con disabilità e riordino dei servizi sociosanitari in materia”. Testo disponibile alla pagina: https://lexview-int.regione.fvg.it/FontiNormative/xml/IndiceLex.aspx?anno=2022&legge=16 (consultato il 25.02.2024).
  19. Mogensen L.L., Drake G., McDonald J., Sharp N. (2023). Young people with intellec-tual disability speak out about life after school: “I want to do more in life than just… be a disability person”. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabil-ity, 1-13. Doi: 10.3109/13668250.2023.2245276.
  20. Savickas M.L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In: Brown S.D. and Lent R.W. (Eds.). Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 147-183). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  21. Shogren K.A. (2013). Self-determination and transition planning. Baltimora: Brookes Publishing.
  22. Thorne S. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. London: Routledge.
  23. Traina I., Andreoli M., Ghirotto L., Leader G. (2022). I programmi a sostegno della transizione al lavoro di giovani con disabilità intellettiva: una integrative review. Education Sciences and Society, 2: 264-283. Doi: 10.3280/ess2-2022oa14236.
  24. UN, (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: UN.
  25. WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), Geneva: WHO (trad. it.: ICF-Classificazione Internazionale del Funzionamento, della Disabilità e della Salute. Trento: Erickson, 2002).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...