Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Evaluation, feedback, equity: a challenge in education

Through the lens of justice. A systematic review on equity and fairness in learning assessment

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12405
Submitted
agosto 30, 2021
Published
2021-12-21

Abstract

Empirical and theoretical studies have highlighted the need to investigate the implications of the introduction of the issue of justice in education. However, little is known about the specific field of learning assessment and about the possible enhancement for assessment processes when inspired by discourses about justice, equity and fairness. What does it mean to rethink assessment through the lens of justice? The present paper aims to uncover key information related to this issue with the aim to provide greater understanding about how to build more equitable assessment practices.

The PRISMA guidelines were adopted. Internet-based bibliographic searches were conducted via 2 major electronic databases (ERIC and Education Source) to access studies examining the association between the issues of justice, fairness and equity in assessment. A total of 26 empirical studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The studies reported the attention to both well as a focus on addressing diversity in the classroom moving away from a model of adjustments and reasonable accommodations towards an equitable and universal assessment. Additional research is important to clarify these issues and an important effort should be made to construct better assessment practices based on students and teachers’ perceptions of justice.

References

  1. Aquario D. (2019). Quale Valutazione per l’apprendimento? Verso la promozione di una assessment identity. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, XII: 29-44. DOI: 10.7346/SIRD-1S2019-P29.
  2. Benadusi L., Giancola O. (2021). Equità e merito nella scuola. Teorie, indagini empiriche, politiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Black P., Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 1: 7-74. DOI: 10.1080/096959598005010.
  4. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B. and Wiliam D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  5. Boud D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2): 151-167. DOI: 10.1080/713695728.
  6. *Burger R. (2017). Student perceptions of the fairness of grading procedures: a multilevel investigation of the role of the academic environment. Higher Education, 74: 301-320. DOI: 10.1007/S10734-016-0049-1.
  7. CAST (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.
  8. *Cole N. S., Zieky M.J. (2001). The New Faces of Fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4): 369-382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01132.x.
  9. *Elwood J., & Lundy L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children’s rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25(3): 335-353. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2010.498150.
  10. *Flores M. A., Veiga Simao A.M., Barros A. and Pereira D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9): 1523-1534. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.881348.
  11. *Flórez Petour M. T., Rozas Assael T., Gysling J. and Olave Astorga J. M. (2018). The consequences of metrics for social justice: tensions, pending issues, and questions. Oxford Review of Education, 44(5): 651-667. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2018.1500356.
  12. *Graham L.J., Tancredi H., Willis J. and McGraw K. (2018). Designing out barriers to access and participation in secondary school assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 45: 103-124. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-018-0266-y.
  13. Grion V., Restiglian E. and Aquario D. (2021). Dal voto alla valutazione. Riflessioni sulle linee guida per la valutazione nella scuola primaria. Nuova Secondaria Ricerca, 7: 82-100.
  14. *Hanesworth P., Bracken S. and Elkington S. (2019). A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: Learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1): 98-114. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405.
  15. *Heritage M., Wylie C. (2018). Reaping the benefits of assessment for learning: achievement, identity, and equity. ZDM, 50(4): 729-741. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0943-3.
  16. *Hidalgo N., Murillo F.J. (2016). Evaluación de Estudiantes para la Justicia Social. Propuesta de un Modelo. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 5(2): 159-179. DOI: 10.15366/riejs2016.5.2.008.
  17. Klenowski V. (2009). Assessment for Learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3): 263-268. DOI: 10.1080/09695940903319646.
  18. *Klenowski V. (2012). Raising the stakes: the challenges for teacher assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 39: 173-192. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-012-0057-9.
  19. *Klenowski V. (2014). Towards fairer assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 41: 445-470. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-013-0132-x.
  20. *Lizzio A., Wilson K. and Hadaway V. (2007). University students’ perceptions of a fair learning environment: a social justice perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2): 195-213. DOI: 10.1080/02602930600801969.
  21. *McArthur J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: the role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7): 967-981. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429.
  22. *Macfarlane B. (2016). The performative turn in the assessment of student learning: a rights perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(7): 839-853. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1183623.
  23. *Murillo F. J., Hidalgo N. (2017). Students’ conceptions about a fair assessment of their learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53: 10-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.001.
  24. *Nguyen T., Walker M. (2015). ‘Capabilities-Friendly’ Assessment for Quality Learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(3): 243-259. DOI: 10.10520/EJC182446.
  25. OECD (2012). Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. OECD Publishing.
  26. OECD (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  27. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
  28. Paris D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3): 93-97. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244.
  29. Pastore S., Andrade H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84: 128-138. DOI: 10.1016/J.TATE.2019.05.003.
  30. *Pepper M. B., Pathak S. (2008). Classroom contribution: What do students perceive as fair assessment? Journal of Education for Business, 83(6): 360-368. DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.6.360-368.
  31. *Phuong A.E., Nguyen J. and Marie D. (2017). Evaluating an Adaptive Equity-Oriented Pedagogy: A Study of its Impacts in Higher Education, The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2): 5-44.
  32. *Pitt E., Winstone N. (2018). The impact of anonymous marking on students’ perceptions of fairness, feedback and relationships with lecturers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7): 1183-1193. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594.
  33. Sambell K., McDowell L. and Montgomery C. (2013). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  34. *Scott S., Webber C. F., Lupart J. L., Aitken N. and Scott D. E. (2014). Fair and equitable assessment practices for all students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1): 52-70. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.776943.
  35. Sen A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. *Stobart G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in Education, 12(3): 275-287. DOI: 10.1080/09695940500337249.
  37. *Stowell M. (2004). Equity, justice and standards: assessment decision making in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4): 495-510. DOI: 10.1080/02602930310001689055.
  38. *Struyven K., Dochy F. and Janssens S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4): 325-341. DOI: 10.1080/02602930500099102.
  39. Swaffield S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4): 433-449. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838.
  40. Tierney R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In: McMillan J. H., editor, SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (pp. 125-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  41. *Tierney R.D. (2014). Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43: 55-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003.
  42. Tomlinson C.A., Moon T. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
  43. UNESCO (2015). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO.
  44. *Waitoller F. R., Thorius K. J. (2016). Cross-Pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning: Toward an Inclusive Pedagogy That Accounts for Dis/Ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3): 366-389. DOI: 10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366.
  45. Whitelegg D. (2002). Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment. Planet, 3: 7-8. DOI: 10.11120/plan.2002.00050007.
  46. Wiliam D. (2008). Quality in assessment. In: Swaffield S. & Williams M., editors, Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 123-137). London: David Fulton.
  47. Wiliam D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1): 3-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
  48. *Willis J., Adie L. and Klenowski V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40: 241-256. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...