Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Regular Articles

Early View

Natural Wine: An Evaluation using the Price Sensitivity Meter and Contingent Valuation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa20590
Submitted
luglio 8, 2025
Published
2026-02-17

Abstract

Natural wines have garnered increasing attention from health-conscious and environmentally aware consumers, thereby carving out a distinct niche within the broader wine market. This study adopts the Contingent Valuation method and the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter to explore consumer willingness to pay and the acceptable price range for natural wine (hereinafter: NW), verify the convergence of results, and investigate which consumer attributes influence the economic appreciation for this beverage. An online survey was conducted on a sample of 370  Italian wine enthusiasts and experts. The results indicate a reasonable level of consumer awareness of the economic value of the NW, despite their willingness to pay a lower price for this beverage. Age, individuals’ income status and product market price have a positive impact on the willingness to pay for NW.  Conversely, the effects of the level of education, naturalness attitude, and wine consumption habits are not significant. The results could support the efforts of the wineries to develop adequate pricing strategies for gaining a competitive advantage and expanding their market share.

References

  1. Alonso González, P., & Parga-Dans, E. (2020). Natural wine: do consumers know what it is, and how natural it really is? Journal of Cleaner Production, 251. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119635.
  2. Amato, M., Ballco, P., López-Galán, B., De Magistris, T., & Verneau, F. (2017). Exploring consumers’ perception and willingness to pay for “Non-Added Sulphite” wines through experimental auctions: A case study in Italy and Spain. Wine Economics and Policy, 6(2), 146-154. Doi: 10.1016/J.WEP.2017.10.002.
  3. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73-106. Doi: 10.1162/00335530360535153.
  4. Arru, B., Furesi, R., Pulina, P., & Madau, F. A. (2022). Price Sensitivity of Fish Fed with Insect Meal: An Analysis on Italian Consumers. Sustainability, 14(11), 6657. Doi: 10.3390/SU14116657.
  5. Bateman, I. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
  6. Bazzani, C., Maesano, G., Begalli, D., & Capitello, R. (2024). Exploring the effect of naturalness on consumer wine choices: Evidence from a survey in Italy. Food Quality and Preference, 113. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105062.
  7. Calvia, M., Rivaroli, S., Uliano, A., Stanco, M., & Canavari, M. (2025). Is precision viticulture worth the effort? An evaluation using the Price Sensitivity Meter and experimental auctions. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 16(1), 87-96. Doi: 10.18461/ijfsd.v16i1o7.
  8. Carson, R. T., & Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 181-210. Doi: 10.1007/S10640-007-9124-5/METRICS.
  9. Cawley, J. (2008). Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity. Economics and Human Biology, 6(2), 281-292. Doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2008.05.003.
  10. Chikumbi, L., Ščasný, M., Muchapondwa, E., & Thiam, D. (2021). Premium price for natural preservatives in wine: a discrete choice experiment. Wine Economics & Policy, 10(1), 101-118. Doi: 10.36253/wep-9613.
  11. Costa, A. I. A., & Jongen, W. M. F. (2006). New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 17(8), 457-465. Doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.02.003.
  12. Costanigro, M., Appleby, C., & Menke, S. D. (2014). The wine headache: Consumer perceptions of sulfites and willingness to pay for non-sulfited wines. Food Quality and Preference, 31(1), 81-89. Doi: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2013.08.002.
  13. D’Amico, M., Di Vita, G., & Monaco, L. (2016). Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 64-71. Doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.02.014.
  14. Dantec, M., Allain, H., Bensafi, M., & Lafraire, J. (2025). Naturalness Attitudinal Scale (NAS): Development and validation of new scales to measure attitudes toward naturalness for different product categories. Food Quality and Preference, 127. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105433.
  15. D’Aveni, R. A. (2010). How to Maximize Your Competitive Position and Increase Your Pricing Power. -- www.summaries.com.
  16. Delmas, M. A., & Lessem, N. (2017). Eco-Premium or Eco-Penalty? Eco-Labels and Quality in the Organic Wine Market. Business and Society, 56(2), 318-356. Doi: 10.1177/0007650315576119.
  17. Dickson-Spillmann, M., Siegrist, M., & Keller, C. (2011). Attitudes toward chemicals are associated with preference for natural food. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 149-156. Doi: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2010.09.001.
  18. Forbes, S. L., Cohen, D. A., Cullen, R., Wratten, S. D., & Fountain, J. (2009). Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(13), 1195-1199. Doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2009.04.008.
  19. Galati, A., Schifani, G., Crescimanno, M., & Migliore, G. (2019). “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 405-413. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.219.
  20. Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Grechi, D., & Scavarda, F. (2023). Natural wine as an expression of sustainability: an exploratory analysis of Italy’s restaurant industry. British Food Journal, 125(13), 390-409. Doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2022-0680/FULL/PDF.
  21. Gellynck, X., & Viaene, J. (2002). Market-orientated positioning of on-farm processed foods as a condition for successful farm diversification. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 531-548. Doi: 10.1111/J.1477-9552.2002.TB00036.X.
  22. Ginon, E., Ares, G., Laboissière, L. H. E. dos S., Brouard, J., Issanchou, S., & Deliza, R. (2014). Logos indicating environmental sustainability in wine production: An exploratory study on how do Burgundy wine consumers perceive them. Food Research International, 62, 837-845. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.013.
  23. Goldsmith, R. E., & d’Hauteville, F. (1998). Heavy wine consumption: empirical and theoretical perspectives. British Food Journal, 4(100), 184-190. Doi: 10.1108/00070709810207865.
  24. Goldstein, R., Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Emerson, J. W., Herschkowitsch, A., & Katz, J. (2008). Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a Large Sample of Blind Tastings*. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(1), 1-9. Doi: 10.1017/S1931436100000523.
  25. Gow, J., Moscovici, D., Rana, R., Rinaldi, A., Ugaglia, A. A., Valenzuela, L., Mihailescu, R., & Haque, R. (2024). Determinants of Purchasing Sustainably Produced Wines by Italian Wine Consumers. Sustainability, 16(19), 8283. Doi: 10.3390/SU16198283.
  26. Hanemann, M., Loomis, J., & Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255-1263.
  27. Harmon, R. R., Unni, R., & Anderson, T. R. (2007). Price sensitivity measurement and new product pricing: A cognitive response approach. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 1961-1967. Doi: 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349523.
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
  29. Khandker, V., & Joshi, K. P. (2019). Price determination for 4G service using price sensitivity model in India. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 18(2), 93-99. Doi: 10.1057/s41272-018-0142-4.
  30. Kim, H., House, L. A., & Gao, Z. (2012). Theoretical and Perceptual Market Values for Fresh Squeezed Orange Juice. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(2). Doi: 10.5539/ijms.v4n2p45.
  31. Kühl, S., Schütz, A., & Busch, G. (2024). Willingness to pay for a multi-level animal husbandry label: an analysis of German meat consumers. British Food Journal, 126(5), 2099-2121. Doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2023-0719.
  32. Lewis, G., Zalan, T., & Gallo, E. (2014). Strategic Implications of the Relationship Between Price and Willingness to Pay: Evidence from a Wine-Tasting Experiment*. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(2), 115-134. Doi: 10.1017/JWE.2014.9.
  33. Lusk, J. L., & Schroeder, T. C. (2004). Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 467-482. Doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x.
  34. Mann, S., Ferjani, A., & Reissig, L. (2012). What matters to consumers of organic wine? British Food Journal, 114(2), 272-284. Doi: 10.1108/00070701211202430/FULL/PDF.
  35. Mauracher, C., Procidano, I., & Valentini, M. (2019). How Product Attributes and Consumer Characteristics Influence the WTP, Resulting in a Higher Price Premium for Organic Wine. Sustainability, 11(5), 1428. Doi: 10.3390/SU11051428.
  36. McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4(1), 103-120. Doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1975.9989847.
  37. Meiselman, H. L. (1995). Quality: Introduction to the special issue. Food Quality and Preference, 6(3), 135-136. Doi: 10.1016/0950-3293(95)90014-4.
  38. Migliore, G., Thrassou, A., Crescimanno, M., Schifani, G., & Galati, A. (2020). Factors affecting consumer preferences for “natural wine”: An exploratory study in the Italian market. British Food Journal, 122(8), 2463-2479. Doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0474.
  39. Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (2013). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Rff press.
  40. Modica, F., Sgroi, F., Baviera-Puig, A., & Sciortino, C. (2025). Main factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for sustainable wine. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 39. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2025.101131.
  41. Moorhouse, T. P., Elwin, A., Ntuli, H., & D’Cruze, N. C. (2023). Assessing the potential for a levy-based system to replace revenue from trophy hunting in South Africa. Global Ecology and Conservation, 47, e02656. Doi: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2023.E02656.
  42. Moscovici, D., Rezwanul, R., Mihailescu, R., Gow, J., Ugaglia, A. A., Valenzuela, L., & Rinaldi, A. (2020). Preferences for eco certified wines in the United States. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 33(2), 153-175. Doi: 10.1108/IJWBR-04-2020-0012/FULL/PDF.
  43. Paczkowski, W. R. (2019). Pricing_Analytics (Routledge, Ed.; 1st Edition). Doi: 10.4324/9781315178349.
  44. Parga-Dans, E., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., González, P. A., & Enríquez, R. O. (2023). A certification for natural wine? A comparative analysis of consumer drivers in Italy and Spain. Wine Economics and Policy, 12(1), 23-35. Doi: 10.36253/wep-12890.
  45. Perrot, B., Bataille, E., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2018). validscale: A command to validate measurement scales. The Stata Journal, 18(1).
  46. Polzin, S. S., Lusk, J. L., & Wahdat, A. Z. (2023). Measuring sustainable consumer food purchasing and behavior. Appetite, 180, 106369. Doi: 10.1016/J.APPET.2022.106369.
  47. Pomarici, E., Amato, M., & Vecchio, R. (2016). Environmental Friendly Wines: A Consumer Segmentation Study. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 534-541. Doi: 10.1016/J.AASPRO.2016.02.067.
  48. Ruggeri, G., Mazzocchi, C., Corsi, S., & Ranzenigo, B. (2022). No More Glass Bottles? Canned Wine and Italian Consumers. Foods, 11(8). Doi: 10.3390/foods11081106.
  49. Sellers-Rubio, R., & Nicolau-Gonzalbez, J. L. (2016). Estimating the willingness to pay for a sustainable wine using a Heckit model. Wine Economics and Policy, 5(2), 96-104. Doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2016.09.002.
  50. Shorrocks, A. F. (2013). Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 99-126.
  51. Sogari, G., Mora, C., & Menozzi, D. (2016). Factors driving sustainable choice: the case of wine. British Food Journal, 118(3), 632-646. Doi: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0131.
  52. Staples, A. J. (2024). Canning cannabis: Consumer preferences for CBD- and THCinfused beverages. Journal of Wine Economics. Doi: 10.1017/jwe.2024.21.
  53. StataCorp LLC. (2024). Stata Statistical Software: Release 18.
  54. Staub, C., Michel, F., Bucher, T., & Siegrist, M. (2020). How do you perceive this wine? Comparing naturalness perceptions of Swiss and Australian consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 79, 103752. Doi: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2019.103752.
  55. Steiner, M., & Hendus, J. (2012). How Consumers’ Willingness to Pay is Measured in Practice: An Empirical Analysis of Common Approaches’ Relevance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2025618.
  56. Szakál, D., Fekete-Frojimovics, Z., Bin Zulkarnain, A. H., Rozgonyi, E., & Fehér, O. (2023). Do we pay more attention to the label that is considered more expensive? Eye-tracking analysis of different wine varieties. Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences, 19(1), 35-50. Doi: 10.1556/446.2023.00069.
  57. Tannico S.r.l. (2024). Tannico. -- https://www.tannico.it/chi-siamo.
  58. Urdapilleta, I., Demarchi, S., & Parr, W. V. (2021). Influence of culture on social representation of wines produced by various methods: Natural, organic and conventional. Food Quality and Preference, 87. Doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104034.
  59. Valenzuela, L., Ortega, R., Moscovici, D., Gow, J., Ugaglia, A., Mihailescu, A., Mandolesi, S., Valenzuela, L., Ortega, R., Moscovici, D., Gow, J., Ugaglia, A. A., & Mihailescu, R. (2022). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Wine – The Chilean Case. Sustainability, 14(17), 10910. Doi: 10.3390/SU141710910.
  60. Van Westendorp, P. H. (1976, September). NSS Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) – A new approach to study consumer perception of prices. Proceedings of the 29th ESOMAR Congres.
  61. Vecchiato, D., Torquati, B., Venanzi, S., & Tempesta, T. (2021). The role of sensory perception in consumer demand for tinned meat: A contingent valuation study. Foods, 10(9). Doi: 10.3390/foods10092185.
  62. Vecchio, R. (2013). Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: Evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 85-92. Doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2013.11.002.
  63. Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Parga Dans, E., & Alonso González, P. (2023). Drivers of consumer willingness to pay for sustainable wines: natural, biodynamic, and organic. Organic Agriculture, 13(2), 247-260. Doi: 10.1007/s13165-023-00425-6.
  64. Vecchio, R., Parga-Dans, E., Alonso González, P., & Annunziata, A. (2021). Why consumers drink natural wine? Consumer perception and information about natural wine. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9(1). Doi: 10.1186/s40100-021-00197-1.
  65. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-Behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194. Doi: 10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3.
  66. Vorasayan, J., Sriwachiratorn, R., & Kessuvan, A. (2018). Consumption Behavior and Willingness to Pay for Fruit Drinks in Bangkok Metropolitan Area. KnE Life Sciences, 4(2), 212. Doi: 10.18502/kls.v4i2.1674.
  67. Weinrich, R., & Gassler, B. (2021). Beyond classical van Westendorp: Assessing price sensitivity for variants of algae-based meat substitutes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102719. Doi: 10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2021.102719.
  68. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2013.281053.
  69. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. Doi: 10.1177/002224298805200302.