Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Luoghi

No. 97-Supplemento (2021): Fragile territories and Pandemic

Courtyard blocks’ strategic role in making compact cities more resilient

  • Lavinia Dondi
  • Michele Morganti
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/tr2021-097-Supplementooa12931
Submitted
novembre 18, 2021
Published
2022-02-03

Abstract

Coronavirus disease pandemic highlights fragilities of compact city, taken as settlement model since time due to its quality of space, efficiency, vibrancy and wellbeing; this has been true especially for high-density urban textures as, they typically lack of a network of proximity open spaces. In addition, pandemic has made us turn our attention towards one of the prevailing urban morphology: the courtyard block. Although underestimated in spatial, social and environmental terms the courtyard is a valuable potential for improving urban resilience. This study explores this potential in recent European regeneration experiences, bringing out five essential design topics to enhance the semi-private network of open spaces and increase resilience of compact city, also in relation to natural disasters, including health crises. 

References

  1. Aa.Vv., 2009, AV Monografias. RCR Arquitectes 1991-2010, 137.
  2. Andersson S.L., 2007, SLA. Seul: C3 Landscape.
  3. Ballester Espigares R., 2013, Calle e Interior de manzana. Mecanismos de transición en la ciudad consolidada: Manzana 13, Rue des Suisses, Londres-Villarroel. Tesi di Master En Proyectos Arquitectónicos Avanzados, Escuela Tecnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid /Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
  4. Bayulken B., Huisingh D., Fisher P. M.J., 2021, «How are Nature Based Solutions Helping in the Greening of Cities in the Context of Crises such as Climate Change and Pandemics? A Comprehensive Review». Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125569. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125569.
  5. Cole R. J., 2020, «Navigating Climate Change: Rethinking the Role of Buildings». Sustainability, 12, 22: 1-25. Doi: 10.3390/su12229527.
  6. Gill K., van Hellemondt I., Kampevold Larsen J., Keravel S, Leger-Smith A., Notteboom B., Rinaldi B.M., 2020, «Corona, the Compact City and Crises». Journal of Landscape Architecture, 15, 1: 4-5. Doi: 10.1080/18626033.2020.1792647.
  7. Gill K., van Hellemondt I., Kampevold Larsen J., Keravel S, Leger-Smith A., Notteboom B., Rinaldi B.M., 2020, «The Distanced City». Journal of Landscape Architecture, 15, 3: 4-5. Doi: 10.1080/18626033.2020.1886504.
  8. European Commission, 2020, A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. SWD (2020) 550. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/eu_renovation_wave_strategy.pdf (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  9. IPCC, 2018, «Global Research and Action Agenda on Cities and Climate Change Science, Cities and Climate Science Conference», Edmonton: IPCC. www.ipcc.ch/event/cities-and-climate-change-science-conference/(accesso: 2021.04.14).
  10. Juhola S., 2018, «Planning for a green city: The Green Factor tool». Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 254-258. Doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.019.
  11. Leveratto J., 2015, Città personali. Interni urbani a misura d’uomo. Siracusa: LetteraVentidue.
  12. Medi Ambient i Serveis Urbans – Hàbitat Urbà, 2013, Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2012-2020. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/sites/default/files/Barcelona%20green%20infrastructure%20and%20biodiversity%20plan%202020.pdf (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  13. Moraci F., Errigo M. F., Fazia C., Campisi T., Castelli F., 2020, «Cities under Pressure: Strategies and Tools to Face Climate Change and Pandemic». Sustainability, 12, 18: 1-31. Doi: 10.3390/su12187743.
  14. Municipalità di Berlino, 2021, Biotope Area Factor. www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/en/nature-and-green/landscape-planning/baf-biotope-area-factor/(accesso: 2021.04.14).
  15. Naafs S., 2021, Amsterdam Rainproof. www.rainproof.nl/sites/default/files/rainproof-magazine-engels.pdf (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  16. Natanian J., Auer T., 2020, «Beyond Nearly Zero Energy Urban Design: A Holistic Microclimatic Energy and Environmental Quality Evaluation Workflow». Sustainable Cities and Society, 56, 102094. Doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102094.
  17. Nikolopoulou, M., 2021, «Thermal Comfort in Urban Spaces». In: Palme M., Salvati A. (a cura di) Urban Microclimate Modelling for Comfort and Energy Studies. Cham: Springer Nature AG, 55-77.
  18. Permanyer L., Portavella J., 2007, Els interiors d’illa de l’Eixample. El significat dels seus noms. Barcellona: Lunwerg.
  19. Righetti V., Sciarra M., 2020, Ordinary Courtyards to Unlock the Spatial Resources in Housing. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale, Scuola di Architettura Urbanistica Ingegneria delle Costruzioni, Politecnico di Milano.
  20. Rojas-Fernández J., Galán-Marín C., Roa-Fernández J., Rivera-Gómez C., 2017, «Correlations Between GIS-Based Urban Building Densification Analysis and Climate Guidelines for Mediterranean Courtyards». Sustainability, 9, 12. Doi: 10.3390/su9122255.
  21. Sertorio L., 2002, Storia dell’abbondanza. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  22. Sheehan M. C., Freire M., Martinez G. S., 2020, «Piloting a City Health Adaptation Typology with Data from Climate-Engaged Cities: Toward Identification of an Urban Health Adaptation Gap». Environmental Research, August, 110435. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110435.
  23. Sim D., 2019, Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life. Washington: Island Press.
  24. Smith I. S., Robbins S., Karakusevic P., Hatherley O., Woodman E., 2015, Exemplary Housing Estate Regeneration in Europe. The Architects’ Journal (special issue), 241: 24-25.
  25. Yok Tan P., Rinaldi B.M., 2019, «Landscapes for Compact Cities ». Journal of Landscape Architecture, 14, 1: 4-7. Doi: 10.1080/18626033.2019.1623540.
  26. Zamani Z., Heidari S., Hanachi P., 2018, «Reviewing the Thermal and Microclimatic Function of Courtyards». Renewable and Sustainable
  27. Energy Reviews, 93: 580-595. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.055.
  28. Sitografia
  29. DELVA, 2019, Deeltuin, Utrecht. https://delva.la/projecten/de-deeltuin/(accesso: 2021.04.14).
  30. DELVA, (in corso) Hooge Steenen, Utrecht. https://delva.la/projecten/hooge-steenen/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  31. Lendager Group, 2017-in corso, The Courtyard of the Future - Straussvej, Copenhagen. https://lendager.com/en/urbanism/the-courtyard-of-thefuture/(accesso: 2021.04.14).
  32. Muf Architecture, 2018, Kings Crescent, Londra. http://muf.co.uk/portfolio/kings-crescent-2018/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  33. OMGEVING, 2010, Geelhandplaats, Antwerp. https://omgeving.be/en/blog/projecten/geelhandplaats/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  34. Periscope, 2019, Colville Estate - Branch Place. Londra. https://periscopestudio.co.uk/projects/branch-place (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  35. Tredje Natur, 2016, Urbanplanen Stage 2 – Bulderbyen, Copenhagen. www.tredjenatur.dk/en/portfolio/urbanplanen-stage-2-2/ (accesso:2021.04.14).
  36. Vega Landskab, 2015, Bergthora Gardrum, Copenhagen. https://vegalandskab.dk/projekter/bergthora-gaardrum/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  37. Vega Landskab, 2017, Nørrebrohus, Copenhagen. https://vegalandskab.dk/projekter/noerrebrohus/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  38. VLUPG, 2007, Binnentuin Vrijburcht, Amsterdam. www.vlugp.nl/projecten/binnentuin-vrijburcht/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).
  39. Lützen Landscape Architects, Labland, 2015, The Courtyard of the Future– Askøgade, Copenhagen. https://klimakvarter.dk/projekt/askoogade/(accesso: 2021.04.14).
  40. SLA, Niras, 2018, The Courtyard of the Future – Tomsgårdsvej, Copenhagen.https://klimakvarter.dk/projekt/tomsgaardsvej/ (accesso: 2021.04.14).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...