Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito

Regular Articles

N. 2 (2025)

Models of Value Construction: A Culturalist Perspective

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc2-2025oa20333
Inviata
6 giugno 2025
Pubblicato
26-02-2026

Abstract

Research on organisational culture has mostly been based on two main types of interpretative models: a normative-typological paradigm that identified universalistic cultural types (Cameron & Quinn, 2006; Schein, 1985), and a symbolic-interpretative paradigm based on the analysis of discursive processes and sensemaking (Weick, 1995). However, both perspectives have limitations when it comes to capturing the dynamic, affective and situated nature of culture in organisational contexts. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a theoretical processual model inspired by Semiotic Cultural Psychology Theory (SCPT; Salvatore et al., 2019a; 2019b) and the local culture perspective (Carli & Paniccia, 1999). This model conceives of organisations as symbolic fields that shape relationships between actors, institutional roles, and discursive devices. At the heart of this discussion lies the paradigm of Models of Value Construction (MVCs), understood as latent configurations of meaning based on affective polarities and social representations that guide action in organisational contexts. This paper also proposes empirical developments of the model to offer tools for analysing organisational culture as a situated, non-standardisable artefact that generates well-being or maladjustment depending on the congruence between the representations of organisational actors and institutional goals, offering a useful framework for intervention in complex organisational contexts.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Andreassi, S., Signore, F., Cordella, B., De Dominicis, S., Gennaro, A., Iuso, S., Kerusauskaite, S., Kosic, A., Mannarini, T., Reho, M., Rocchi, G., Rochira, A., Scharfbillig, M., & Salvatore, S. (2023). Identity and Symbolic Universes in Voting Behavior. A study of the Italian society. Psychology Hub, 40(2), 69-80. Doi: 10.13133/2724-2943/17900.
  2. Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of management studies, 39(5), 619-644. Doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305.
  3. Ashkanasy, N.M., Broadfoot, L., & Falkus, S. (2000). Questionnaire measures of organizational culture. In N.M. Ashkanasy, C.P.M. Wilderom, & M.F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 131-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  4. Bao, Y., Dolan, S. L., & Tzafrir, S. S. (2012). Value congruence in organizations: Literature review, theoretical perspectives, and future directions. ESADE Business School Research Paper, 239, 3-38. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2154976.
  5. Babayan, K., & Babayan, M. (2025). Implementing Agile teams in digital territorial development projects. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3276, No. 1, p. 020022). AIP Publishing LLC. Doi: 10.1063/5.0263979.
  6. Bendassolli, P. F. (Ed.) (2019). Culture, work and psychology: Invitations to dialogue. US: Information Age Publishing, INC.
  7. Benzécri, J. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  8. Benzécri, J. P., & Bellier, L. (1973). L’analyse des données: leçons sur l’analyse factorielle et la reconnaissance des formes et travaux du laboratoire de statistique de l’Université de Paris VI.
  9. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Imprint.
  10. Chatman, J. A., Caldwell, D. F., O’Reilly, C. A., & Doerr, B. (2014). Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high‐technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 785-808. Doi: 10.1002/job.1928.
  11. Caputo, A. (2015). The local culture as a means to explore the processes of social coexistence: A case study on a neighborhood in the city of Rome. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2(1), 22-39. Doi: 10.1285/i24212113v1i2p22.
  12. Caputo, A. (2013). Health demand in primary care context: What do people think about physicians?. Psychology, health & medicine, 18(2), 145-154. Doi: 10.1080/13548506.2012.687828.
  13. Carli, R., & Giovagnoli, F. (2011). A cultural approach to clinical psychology. Psychoanalysis and analysis of the demand. In S. Salvatore & T. Zittoun (Eds.), Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis. Pathways to synthesis. pp. 117-150. Charlotte, NC: Info Age Publishing.
  14. Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. M. (2002). L’analisi emozionale del testo [Emotional text analysis] (Vol. 1). Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. M. (2003). Analisi della domanda: Teoria e tecnica dell’intervento in psicologia clinica [Analysis of the demand: Theory and technique of intervention in clinical psychology]. Bologna: il Mulino.
  16. Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. (1999). Psicologia della formazione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  17. Ciavolino, E., Lagetto, G., Montinari, A., Al-Nasser, A. D., Al-Omari, A. I., Zaterini, M. J., & Salvatore, S. (2020). Customer satisfaction and service domains: a further development of PROSERV. Quality & Quantity, 54, 1429-1444. Doi: 10.1007/s11135-019-00888-4.
  18. Ciavolino, E., Salvatore, S., Mossi, P., & Lagetto, G. (2019). High-order PLS path model for multi-group analysis: the prosumership service quality model. Quality & Quantity, 53(5), 2371-2384. Doi: 10.1007/s11135-018-0747-0.
  19. Ciavolino, E., Redd, R., Evrinomy, A., Falcone, M., Fini, V., Kadiana-ki, I., Kullasepp, K., Mannarini, T., Matsopoulos, A., Mossi, P., Rochira, A., Santarpia, A., Sammut, G., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G.A. & Salvatore, S. (2017). “Views of Context”. An instrument for the analysis of the cultural milieu. A first validation study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10(2), 599-628. Doi: 10.1285/i20705948v10n2p599.
  20. Cremaschi, M., Fioretti, C., Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2021). Culture and Policy-Making: pluralism, Performativity, and Semiotic Capital. Springer International Publishing.
  21. D’aveni, R. A., & Ravenscraft, D. J. (1994). Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: does vertical integration improve performance?. Academy of management Journal, 37(5), 1167-1206. Doi: 10.5465/256670.
  22. De Luca Picione, R., De Fortuna, A. M., Balzani, E., & Marsico, G. (2025). Trajectories of the notion of liminality: Identity, border, threshold, affectivity and spatio-temporal processes of transformation. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), Doi: 10.1177/1354067X241246760.
  23. De Luca Picione, R., & Valsiner, J. (2017). Funzioni psicologiche dei confini semiotici nel sense-making: Liminalità dei processi narrativi. Europe’s journal of psychology, 13(3), 532-547. Doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09555-y.
  24. Dolan, S. L., & Raich, M. (2013). Coaching by values, entrepreneurship and care: A framework for reengineering an innovative and sustainable culture. Kindai Management Review, 19-20.
  25. Dolan S.L. (2011). Coaching by Values. Indiana (USA): iUniverse.
  26. Fornari, F. (2019). The challenges of globalisation concerning European identity and development. Rivista quadrimestrale di Scienze Storiche e Sociali dell’Istituto Luigi Sturzo. Roma: Gangemi Editore spa.
  27. Gamsakhurdia, V. L. (2020). Systematic semiotic organisation and Anthropologisation of the science of soul – Towards cultural psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 625-638. Doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09541-4.
  28. Gennaro, A., Reho, M., Limone, P., Rega, A., Brocca, L., Lagetto, G., & Salvatore, S. (2025). Detecting organizational cultures: the Models of Value Construction perspective (submitted).
  29. Gore Jr, P. A. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of career assessment, 14(1), 92-115. Doi: 10.1177/1069072705281367.
  30. Harrison, J. R., & Carroll, G. R. (2021). Culture and demography in organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  31. Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Humboldt, S., Leal, I., Laneiro, T., & Tavares, P. (2013). Examining occupational stress, sources of stress and stress management strategies through the eyes of management consultants: A multiple correspondence analysis for latent constructs. Stress and Health, 29(5), 410-420. Doi: 10.1002/smi.2487.
  33. Jung, T., Scott, T., Davies, H. T., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., & Mannion, R. (2009). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public administration review, 69(6), 1087-1096. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02066.x.
  34. Kerušauskaitė, S., Reho, M., Mannarini, T. (2023). A Tool to Analyze the Cultural Milieu: View of Context (VOC). In S. Salvatore, G. A. Veltri, & T. Mannarini (Eds.). Methods and Instruments in the Study of Meaning-Making (pp. 127-153). Berlino: Springer.
  35. Kondreddy, V. K., & Rastogi, D. D. (2025). Microservices and Auto-mation Excellence: Full-Stack Development for the Intelligent Enterprise 2025. Yashita Prakashan Private Limited.
  36. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Warwick, K. M. (1984). Multivariate de-scriptive statistical analysis: Correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  37. Li, Z. (2025). Managing Paradoxes for Sustainable Enterprise Growth: Insights from Chinese Wisdom and Practice. London: Routledge.
  38. Norman, R. (1986). Service management: Strategy and leadership in service businesses. New York: Wiley.
  39. O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516. Doi: 10.5465/256404.
  40. Perreault, K., Dionne, C. E., Rossignol, M., Poitras, S., & Morin, D. (2014). Physiotherapy practice in the private sector: organizational characteristics and models. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 1-13. Doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-362.
  41. Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management science, 29(3), 363-377. Doi: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363.
  42. Russo, F., Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2020). From the manifestations of culture to the underlying sensemaking process. The contribution of semiotic cultural psychology theory to the interpretation of socio‐political scenario. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(3), 301-320. Doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12235.
  43. Salvatore S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte NC: InfoAge Publishing.
  44. Salvatore, S. (2018). Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 35-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Salvatore, S., De Luca Picione, R., Bochicchio, V., Mannino, G., Langher, V., Pergola, F., Velotti, P., & Venuleo, C. (2021). The affectivization of the public sphere: the contribution of psychoanalysis in understanding and counteracting the current crisis scenarios. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject, Action & Society, 1(1), 3-30. Doi: 10.32111/SAS.2021.1.1.2.
  46. Salvatore, S., De Luca Picione, R., Cozzolino, M., Bochicchio, V., & Palmieri, A. (2022). The role of affective sensemaking in the constitution of experience. The affective pertinentization model (APER). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-19. Doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09590-9.
  47. Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., & Veltri, G. A. (2019b). Symbolic universes in time of (post) crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  48. Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Veltri, G.A., Avdi, E., Battaglia, F., Tejerina, J.C, Ciavolino, E., Cremaschi, M., Kadianaki, I., Kharlamov, N.A., Krasteva, A., Kullasepp, K., Matsopoulos, A., Meschiari, C., Mossi, P., Psinas, P., Redd, R., Rochira, A., Santarpia, A., Sammut, G., Valsiner, J., & Valmorbida, A. (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0189885. Doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0189885.
  49. Salvatore, S., & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect, unconscious and sense-making. A psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogic model. New ideas in psychology, 29(2), 119-135. Doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.06.001.
  50. Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., Manfreda, A., & Calogiuri, S. (2019). Models of value construction: For a semio-dialectical approach to organization and social action. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-33369-016.
  51. Salvatore, S., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009). Grasping the dynamic nature of intersubjectivity. In Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 171-190). New York, NY: Springer US.
  52. Salvatore, S., Mannarini, T., Gennaro, A., Celia, G., De Dominicis, S., De Luca Picione, R., Iuso, S., Kerušauskaitė, S., Kleinbub, J. R., Palmieri, A., Pergola, F., Reho, M., Rochira, A., & Rocchi, G. (2023). The Affective Regulation of Uncertainty: The Semiotic Dimensionality Model (SDM). Social Sciences, 12(4), 217. Doi: 10.3390/socsci12040217.
  53. Salvatore, S., Palmieri, A., Picione, R. D. L., Bochicchio, V., Reho, M., Serio, M. R., & Salvatore, G. (2024). The affective grounds of the mind. The Affective Pertinentization (APER) Model. Physics of Life Reviews, 50, 143-165. Doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.07.008.
  54. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., & Veltri, G. A. (2019a). The theoretical and methodological framework. semiotic cultural psychology, symbolic iniverses and lines of semiotic forces. In S. Salvatore, V. Fini, T. Mannarini, J. Valsiner, & G. A. Veltri (Eds.), Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. The Future of European Societies (pp. 25-49). Berlino: Springer.
  55. Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field and dynamic nature of sensemaking. Theoretical and methodological implications. Papers on Social representations, 22(2), 21-41. https://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/.
  56. Salvatore, S., & Zittoun, T. (Eds.) (2011). Cultural psychology and psycho-analysis: Pathways to synthesis. Charlotte (USA): IAP Information Age Publishing.
  57. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  58. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  59. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. India Pvt Ltd: SAGE Publications.
  60. Venuleo, C., Mossi, P. G., & Salvatore, S. (2014). Socio-symbolic models and retention study at university. A case study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 321-342. Doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.927847.
  61. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
  62. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.
  63. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042. Doi: 10.1177/0149206311406265.