Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

SPECIAL ISSUE Clinic of democracy

No. 1 (2024)

Reciprocity and prosocial behavior in democratic dynamic

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2024oa18429
Submitted
settembre 6, 2024
Published
2024-10-15

Abstract

Prosocial behavior (CP) currently presents some conceptual overlaps with the construct of reciprocity, understood here as a lubricant of democratic dynamics. The proposed study is based on a research agreement between the Universities of Palermo and Malaga, to test the relationship between CP and reciprocity and the multiple dimensions that intervene on the two constructs at the individual, interpersonal and community level. A structural equation model (with the Lisrel method) was used to assess whether the principle of equity, belief in a just world, sense of community and neighborhood norm increase CP and whether this together with worldview and social trust, in turn, increase positive reciprocity and decrease negative reciprocity. The analyses presented are partial and concern the sample of Palermo, consisting of 307 subjects, residing in the eight districts of the city. From the analysis of the data, the parameters of the model are satisfactory even if the effect of the sense of community is not significant.

References

  1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. & Custers, R. (2003). Automatic normative behavior in environments: the moderating role of conformity in activating situational norms. Social Cognition, 21(6), 447-464. DOI: 10.1521/soco.21.6.447.28687.
  2. Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B. & Renner, E. (2000). Themo on lighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42(2), 265-277.
  3. Alberti, C. (2018). Our means. In R. E. Manzetti (ed.), Strong desires for democracy. Rosenberg & Sellier.
  4. Amerio P. (2004). Problemi umani in comunità di massa. Einaudi.
  5. Bartolotta, M. (2012). Volunteers in the age of individualism. Identikit, gender and motivations for prosocial behaviour of young people (Tutor: Prof. Giovanni Ciofalo, Co-tutor: Prof. Gaia Peruzzi. A.Y. 2012/2013) https://tesidottorato.depositolegale.it/static/PDF/web/viewer.jsp.
  6. Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: is it ever altruistic? Advances in experimental social psychology, 20, 65-122.
  7. Becker, Lawrence C. (1986). Reciprocity. University of Chicago Press.
  8. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  9. Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (1994). Testing structural equation models. Sage.
  10. Brooks, T. (2012). Reciprocity as mutual recognition. The Good Society, 21 (1): 21-35.
  11. Bruni, L. & Faldetta, G. (2012). Il dono ‒ Le sue ambivalenze e i suoi paradossi. Un dialogo interdisciplinare. Di girolamo Editore.
  12. Caprara, G. V., Capanna, C., Steca, P. & Paciello, M. (2005). Measure and determinants of prosociality. A cognitive social approach. Italian Journal of Psychology, 32, 287-307. DOI: 10.1421/20313.
  13. Cattarinussi, B. (1994). Altruismo e solidarietà. Riflessioni su prosocialità e volontariati. FrancoAngeli.
  14. Cialdini, R. B. & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social Norms, Conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 151-192). McGraw–Hill.
  15. Cochard, F., Nguyen Van, P. & Willinger, M. (2004). Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(1), 31-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.07.004.
  16. Dalbert, C., Lipkus, I. M., Sallay, H. & Goch, I. (2001). A just and an unjust world: Structure and validity of different world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 561-577.
  17. Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. S. & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An Individual Difference Measure of Distributive Justice Preferences. Social Justice Research, 12(3), 233-240. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022148418210.
  18. Delgado-Márquez, B.L. et al. (2012). The dynamic nature of trust transfer: Measurement and the influence of reciprocity. Decision Support Systems 54, 226-234. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
  19. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
  20. Dzuka, J. & Dalbert, C. (2000). Well-being as a psychological indicator of health and in old age. Studia Psychologia, 42, 61-70.
  21. Edlund, J. E., Brad, J. Sagarin & Brian, S. J. (2007). Reciprocity and the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 589-596. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.007.
  22. Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (pp. 701-778), Wiley.
  23. Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J. & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who Takes the most Revenge? Individual Differences in Negative Reciprocity Norm Endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 787-799. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264047.
  24. Fisher, A. & Sonn, C. (eds.). Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implication (pp. 205-222). New York: Plenum. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_11.
  25. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Aff., 74, 89. DOI: 10.2307/20047302.
  26. Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795-817.
  27. Gneezy, U. & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 791-810.
  28. Gray, A., Jackson, D. N. & McKinlay, J. B. (1991). The relation between dominance, anger, and hormones in normally aging men: Results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53, 375-385.
  29. Heyman, G. D., Dweck, C. S. & Cain, K. M. (1992). Young children’s vulnerability to self-blame and helplessness: Relationship to beliefs about goodness. Child Development, 63, 401-415. DOI: 10.4103/jehp. jehp_327_20.
  30. Hombrados-Mendieta, I., Gomez-Jacinto, L., Domínguez-Fuentes, J. M. & García-Leiva, P. (2013). Sense of community and satisfaction with life among immigrants and the native population. Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 601-614.
  31. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V [Computer software]. Scientific Software.
  32. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  33. Keyes, C. L. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121-140.
  34. Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I. & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Community & Society, 9(5), 582-611. DOI: 10.1080/ 13691180600965575.
  35. Lam, C. M. (2012). Prosocial involvement as a positive youth development construct: a conceptual review. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 769158. DOI: 10.1100/2012/769158.
  36. Lavanco, G. & Varveri, L. (2008). Psicologia del mutamento sociale. FrancoAngeli.
  37. Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Perkins, D.D., Pastore, M., Santinello, M. & Mazzardis, S. (2012). Perceived neighborhood social resources as determinants of prosocial behavior in early adolescence. American journal of community psychology, 50, 37-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-011-9470-x.
  38. Lietaer, B. (2001). The Future of Money. Random House.
  39. Mannarini, T. & Arcidiacono, C. (2021). Psicologia di comunità: linee guida per una professionalità al servizio dei bisogni del singolo, del-le organizzazioni e delle collettività. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 16(2), 54-59.
  40. Marta E. & Scabini E. (2003). Young volunteers. Committed, growing and making grow. Giunti.
  41. Marta, E., Scabini, E. (2012). Psicologia del volontariato. Carocci.
  42. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. DOI: 10.2307/258792.
  43. Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). The psychology of democracy. American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/14806-000.
  44. Mussen, P., Esenber-Berg, N. (1985). Le origini della capacità di interessarsi, dividere ed aiutare. Bulzoni.
  45. Novara, C., Martos-Méndez, M. J., Gómez-Jacinto, L., Hombrados-Mendieta, I., Varveri, L. & Polizzi, C. (2023). The influence of social support on the wellbeing of immigrants residing in Italy: Sources and functions as predictive factors for life satisfaction levels, sense of community and resilience. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92,101743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101743.
  46. Novara, C., Moscato, G., Gomez, L., Hombrados-Mendieta, I, Varveri, L. Rochira, A. & Garro, M. (2021). Life Satisfaction and Psychological Distress of African Immigrants in Italy and Spain: The Protective Role of Social Support and Sense of Community. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2021.1995923.
  47. Novara, C., Varveri, L. (2021). Per una comunità immunizzata. Il modello di reciprocità, gratuità e fiducia per una transizione sociale. In L. Varveri (a cura di), Pandemie e benessere: resilienza trasformativa e cambiamenti possibili. Palermo University Press.
  48. Oceja, L. & Salgado, S. (2013). Why do we help? World change orientation as an antecedent of prosocial action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 127-136.
  49. Peterson, N. A., Speer, P. W. & McMillan, D. W. (2008). Validation of a brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 61-73.
  50. Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation (vol. 45). Beacon Press.
  51. Prilleltensky, I. (2003). Understanding and overcoming oppression: Towards psychopolitical validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 195-202.
  52. Quinn, A. & Schlenker, B.R. (2002). Can accountability produce independence? Goals as determinants of the impact of accountability on conformity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 472-483.
  53. Raddon, M. B. (2003). Community and money: Men and women making change. Black Rose.
  54. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
  55. Riggio, G. (2024). Che cosa ci tiene uniti?. Il Pellegrino.
  56. Salfi, D., Barbara, G. (1994). Possiamo davvero apprendere a stare be-ne con gli altri? La risposta è la prosocialità. In B. Catarinussi (a cura di), Altruismo e solidarietà. Aspetti e problemi del comportamento prosociale. FrancoAngeli.
  57. Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Veltri, G. A., Avdi, E., Battaglia, F. & Kadianaki, I. (2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PloS One, 13(1), e0189885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189885.
  58. Schedler, A. (2021). Democratic Reciprocity. Journal Political Philos, 29, 252-278. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12232.
  59. Serva, B. M. A & Fuller, M. A. (2004). The effects of trustworthiness perceptions on the formation of initial trust: implications for MIS student teams. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15 (4), 383-395.
  60. Stanca, L. (2009). Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 190-202.
  61. Stanca, L., Bruni, L. & Corazzini L. (2007). Testing theories of reci-procity: Does motivation matter? Working Paper, 109, Economics Department, University of Milan-Bicocca.
  62. Volpato, C. (2019). The psychological roots of inequality. Ed. Laterza.
  63. Zamagni S. (2006). L’economia come se la persona contasse: verso una teoria economica relazionale. Working paper, 32, 1-28.
  64. Zani B. (2005). Quali possibili basi per “comunità possibili”. Occupiamoci di identità, reciprocità e fiducia. Psicologia di comunità, 1, 31-40.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...