Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Saggi

N. 94 (2026)

La valutazione esterna delle scuole per il miglioramento: evidenze da una systematic review qualitativa

  • Michela Freddano
  • Ilaria Salvadori
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/Riv2026oa22396
Inviata
7 aprile 2026
Pubblicato
28-04-2026

Abstract

The paper deepens the role of the external evaluation of schools as a lever for the improvement of the education system. A qualitative systematic review of literature based on the PRISMA method selected 20 contributions related to the impacts of external evaluation on school processes. The study explores external evaluation practices carried out in different European countries, highlighting a marked heterogeneity in the impact of these processes and showing how external evaluation may be able to generate long-term positive effects on organizational change and decision-making processes. The analysis found that the perception of quality by recipients, fairness and transparency in the feedback from external evaluation and inspection visits, stakeholder involvement and change-oriented leadership of the school leader can be key elements in implementing improvement actions.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Altrichter, H., Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? Educational Effectiveness Theory (pp. 29-53). Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2014.927369
  2. Atjonen, P. (2014). School-focused Evaluation in Focus-Finnish Teachers’ Experiences of Internal and External Evaluation of Schools. Nordic Studies in Education, 34(4), 279-297. DOI: 10.18261/issn1891-5949-2014-04-05
  3. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current directions in psychological science, 9(3), 75-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
  4. Butler, A., Hall, H., Copnell, B. (2016). A guide to writing a qualitative systematic review protocol to enhance evidence-based practice in nursing and health care. Worldviews on Evidencebased Nursing, 13(3), 241–249. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12134
  5. Commissione Europea/EACEA/Eurydice (2015). Assicurare la qualità dell’istruzione: politiche e approcci alla valutazione delle scuole in Europa. Rapporto Eurydice. Lussemburgo: Ufficio delle pubblicazioni dell’Unione europea.
  6. Dedering, K. (2015). The same procedure as every time? School inspections and school development in Germany. Improving Schools, 18(2), 171-184. DOI: 10.1177/1365480215585910
  7. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0, Journal of mixed methods research, 6(2), 80-88. DOI: 10.1177/1558689812437186
  8. Ehren, M.C. (2016). School inspections and school improvement; the current evidence base. Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, 69-85. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_4
  9. Ehren, M.C.M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools-describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 3-43. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
  10. Ehren, M.C., Gustafsson, J.E., Altrichter, H., Skedsmo, G., Kemethofer, D., Huber, S.G. (2015). Comparing effects and side effects of different school inspection systems across Europe. Comparative education, 51(3), 375-400. DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2015.1045769
  11. Ehren, M.C., Honingh, M.E., Hooge, E.H., O’Hara, J. (2016). Changing school board governance in primary education through school inspections. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 205-223. DOI: 10.1177/1741143214549969
  12. Ehren, M., Hutchinson, J., Muñoz-Chereau, B. (2023). Place-based disparities faced by stuck schools in England: a contextual understanding of low performance and the role of inspection outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(4), 401–418. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2238698
  13. Ehren, M., Shackleton, N. (2014). Impact of school inspections on teaching and learning in primary and secondary education in the Netherlands. London: Institute of Education.
  14. European Commission (1999). Glossary of 300 concepts and technical terms. In: Evaluating socio-economic programmes. MEANS Collection, Vol. 6. Luxembourg: Publications Office
  15. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2015). Assuring Quality in Education: Policies and Approaches to School Evaluation in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  16. Eurydice (2016). I quaderni di Eurydice Italia. La valutazione delle scuole in Europa: politiche e approcci in alcuni paesi europei, Eurydice Italia.
  17. Freddano, M. (a cura di) (2025a). L’autovalutazione nell’Istruzione e Formazione Professionale. Rapporto sulla sperimentazione del RAV IeFP in 173 sedi formative accreditate, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  18. Freddano, M. (2025b). RAV integrato, RAV infanzia e RAV CPIA per l’autovalutazione 2025-2028, Notizie della scuola, 1/2: 17-56. ISSN: 20380534.
  19. Freddano, M., Salvadori, I. (2025), Il ruolo della valutazione esterna nella formulazione delle priorità di miglioramento: evidenze dalla sperimentazione INVALSI a.s. 2023/2024, Notizie della scuola, 1/2: 100-111. ISSN: 20380534.
  20. Freddano M., Stringher, C. (2021). (a cura di) Fare autovalutazione nella scuola dell’infanzia. Rapporto sulla sperimentazione del RAV Infanzia. Franco Angeli, Milano.
  21. Gärtner, H. (2016). What school characteristics influence the quality of teaching? A secondary analysis of school inspection data. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 19, 509-526. DOI: 10.1007/s11618-016-0691-5
  22. Gärtner, H., Wurster, S., Pant, H.A. (2014). The effect of school inspections on school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 489–508. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2013.811089
  23. Ghirotto, L. (2020). La systematic review nella ricerca qualitativa. Carocci, Roma.
  24. Gough, D., Thomas, J., Oliver, S. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. An introduction to systematic reviews, 1-352.
  25. Gray, A. (2014). Supporting school improvement: the role of inspectorates across Europe. In Brussel: The Standing International Conference of Inspectorates.
  26. Gustafsson, J.E., Ehren, M.C., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., O’Hara, J. (2015). From inspection to quality: Ways in which school nspection influences change in schools. Studies in educational evaluation, 47, 47-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.07.002
  27. Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
  28. Hofer, S.I., Holzberger, D., Reiss, K. (2020). Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: A systematic research synthesis on 30 years of international research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100864. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100864.
  29. INVALSI (2016), Programma e protocollo per le visite di valutazione esterna nel Sistema Nazionale di Valutazione, disponibile al sito: https://www.invalsi.it/snv/docs/0220/Programma%20e%20protocollo%20visite%20valutazione%20esterna.pdf
  30. INVALSI (2022a), RAV 2022-2025. Mappa degli indicatori, disponibile al sito: https://www.miur.gov.it/documents/20182/0/Mappa+degli+indicatori.pdf/e1b5fde3-7492-4943-fc0a-c26101136b4f?t=1670254688590
  31. INVALSI (2022b), RAV 2022-2025. Guida all’autovalutazione, disponibile al sito: https://www.miur.gov.it/documents/20182/0/GUIDA+ALL%27AUTOVALUTAZIONE+RAV_def.pdf/658e8482-b55a-a0cc-661a-e41eddb5295d?t=1670254031400
  32. INVALSI (2022c), Rapporto sulla Sperimentazione del RAV per l’Istruzione e Formazione Professionale, testo disponibile al sito: https://www.invalsi.it/snv/docs/1122/RAPPORTO_RAV%20IEFP_DEF.pdf
  33. Jones, K.L., Tymms, P., Kemethofer, D., O’Hara, J., McNamara, G., Huber, S., Greger, D. (2017). The unintended consequences of school inspection: the prevalence of inspection sideeffects in Austria, the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 805-822. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499
  34. Kemethofer, D., Gustafsson, J.E., Altrichter, H. (2017). Comparing effects of school inspections in Sweden and Austria. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29, 319-337. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-017-9265-1
  35. Klerks, M.C.J.L. (2013). The effect of school inspections: a systematic review. School Improvement, 2-32.
  36. Maraolo, A.E. (2021). Una bussola per le revisioni sistematiche: la versione italiana della nuova edizione del PRISMA statement. BMJ, 372, n71.
  37. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & TP Group. (2009). Linee guida per il reporting di revisioni sistematiche e meta-analisi: il PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  38. Mouraz, A., Leite, C., Fernandes, P. (2019). Between external influence and autonomy of schools: effects of external evaluation of schools. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 29. DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2922
  39. Nelson, R., Ehren, M. (2014). Review and synthesis of evidence on the (mechanisms of) impact of school inspections. University of Twente.
  40. Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills. (2020). Fight or flight? How ‘stuck’ schools are overcoming isolation: An evaluation project (Reference No. 190042).
  41. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fight-or-flight-how-stuck-schools-are-overcomingisolation/fight-or-flight-how-stuck-schools-are-overcoming-isolation-evaluation-report
  42. Ólafsdóttir, B., Jónasson, J.T., Sigurðardóttir, A.K. (2022). Use and impact of external evaluation feedback in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101181. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101181
  43. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
  44. Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., Van Petegem, P. (2015). Explaining effects and side effects of school inspections: a path analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 333-347. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1085421
  45. Quintelier, A., De Maeyer, S., Vanhoof, J. (2020). Determinants of teachers’ feedback acceptance during a school inspection visit. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(4), 529-547. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2020.1750432
  46. Scheerens, J. (2015). Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 10-31. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2013.858754
  47. Scheerens, J., Ehren, M. C. (2015). The evidence base for school inspection frameworks. Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections, 19-46.
  48. Scheerens, J., Glas, C. A., Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring: A systemic approach (Vol. 13). Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780203971055
  49. Schweinberger, K., Quesel, C., Mahler, S., Höchli, A. (2017). Effects of feedback on process features of school quality: A longitudinal study on teachers’ reception of school inspection of Swiss compulsory schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.004
  50. Seabra, F., Abelha, M., Henriques, S., Mouraz, A. (2022). Policies and practices of external evaluation of schools: spaces for teacher collaboration? Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 30, 644-668. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.868481
  51. Wagner, I. (2020). Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of follow-up classroom observations after school inspections in Northern Germany. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100913. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100913
  52. Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (p. 161). Springer Nature.