Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli

N. 2 (2021)

Dal climate denial alla natura da salvare: il riduzionismo nella narrazione dei cambiamenti climatici

  • Sara Bonati
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa2-2021oa12032
Inviata
4 June 2021
Pubblicato
18-06-2021

Abstract

Il concetto di ‘natura’ nella narrazione dei cambiamenti climatici è spesso abusato e oggetto di strumentalizzazione. Ciò che ne consegue è una fitta rete di disinformazione e misinformazione. Il contributo, pertanto, vuole discutere i diversi modi in cui il concetto di natura è (ab)usato in relazione ai cambiamenti climatici, partendo dalla costruzione sociale della natura. A tale scopo è discusso il ruolo del riduzionismo nella promozione di un’idea di natura intesa unicamente in prospettiva antropocentrica, entro la quale si collocano diverse narrazioni dei cambiamenti climatici: da una parte, le retoriche di ‘save
climate/nature’, nel quale il clima/la natura sono intesi come risorsa da salvare; dall’altra, le teorie negazioniste, che sfruttano l’idea di natura costruita per mettere in discussione le evidenze offerte dalla scienza.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Armitage K.C. (2005). State of denial: The United States and the politics of global warming. Globalizations, 2, 3: 417-427. DOI: 10.1080/14747730500368064
  2. Bagliani M., Pietta A. e Bonati S. (2019). Il cambiamento climatico in prospettiva geografica. Aspetti fisici, impatti, politiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Beck U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity?. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 2-3: 254-266. DOI: 10.1177/0263276409358729
  4. Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I. e Wisner B. (1994). Disaster pressure and release model. In: Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I. e Wisner B., a cura di, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters, 21-45. DOI: 10.4324/9780203428764_chapter_2
  5. Bonati S. (2015). Multiscalar narratives of a disaster: from media amplification to western participation in Asian tsunamis. Journal of Current Cultural Research, 7, 3: 496-511. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1572496
  6. Ead., Tononi M. e Zanolin M. (2021). Social nature geographies/Geografie sociali della natura. Rivista Geografica Italiana, 127, 2: 5-20.
  7. Caserini S. (2009). Guida alle leggende sul clima che cambia. Come la scienza diventa opinione. Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.
  8. Castree N. (2013). Making Sense of Nature. London: Routledge.
  9. Id. (2017). Speaking for the ‘people disciplines’: Global change science and its human dimensions. The Anthropocene Review, 4, 3: 160-182. DOI: 10.1177/2053019617734249
  10. Id. e Braun B. (Eds.) (1998). The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures. In: Braun B. e Castree N., a cura di (1998). Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. London: Routledge.
  11. Id. e Id. (2001). Social Nature: Theory. Practice, and Politics. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  12. Comfort L., Wisner B., Cutter S., Pulwarty R., Hewitt K., Oliver-Smith A., Wiener J., Fordham M., Peacock W. e Krimgold F. (1999). Reframing disaster policy: the global evolution of vulnerable communities. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 1, 1: 39-44. DOI: 10.1016/s1464-2867(99)00005-4
  13. Demeritt D. (1996). Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 484-503. DOI: 10.2307/622593
  14. Id. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 2: 307-337. DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.00245
  15. Id. (2002). What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 6: 767-790. DOI: 0.1191/0309132502ph402oa
  16. Dunlap R.E. e Catton W.R. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 1: 5-30. DOI: 10.1007/bf02691936
  17. Escobar A. (1996). Constructing nature: Elements for a poststructural political ecology. In: Peet R. e Watts M., a cura di, Liberation Ecology. New York: Routledge.
  18. Gleick P.H. (2017). Climate, water, and conflict: Commentary on Selby et al. 2017. Political Geography, 60: 248-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.009
  19. Goemans M. e Ballamingie P. (2013). Forest as hazard, forest as victim: community perspectives and disaster mitigation in the aftermath of Kelowna’s 2003 wildfires. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 57, 1: 56-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-
  20. 2012.00447.x
  21. Hacking (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  22. Hejny J. (2018). The Trump administration and environmental policy: Reagan redux? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8, 2: 197-211. DOI: 10.1007/s13412-018-0470-0
  23. Hulme M. (2011). Reducing the future to climate: a story of climate determinism and reductionism. Osiris, 26, 1: 245-266. DOI: 10.1086/661274
  24. Jacques P.J. (2012). A general theory of climate denial. Global Environmental Politics, 12, 2: 9-17. DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00105
  25. Kaiser J. e Hagan J. (2015). Gendered genocide: The socially destructive process of genocidal rape, killing, and displacement in Darfur. Law & Society Review, 49, 1: 69-107. DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12122
  26. Kelley C., Mohtadi S., Cane M., Seager R. e Kushnir Y. (2017). Commentary on the Syria case: Climate as a contributing factor. Political Geography, 60, 1: 245-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.013
  27. Kelly P.M. e Adger W.N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and Facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47, 4: 325-352.
  28. Kelman (2017, 29 agosto). Don’t blame climate change for the hurricane Harvey disaster - blame society, The Conversation, testo disponibile sul sito: https://theconversation.com/dont-blame-climate-change-for-the-hurricane-harvey-disaster-blame-society-83163.
  29. Id., Gaillard J.C., Lewis J. e Mercer J. (2016). Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change. Natural Hazards, 82, 1: 129-143. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2294-0
  30. Kevane M. e Gray L. (2008). Darfur: rainfall and conflict. Environmental Research Letters, 3, 3: 034006. DOI: 10.1088/1748-326/3/3/034006
  31. Klein N. (2019). On Fire: the (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal. New York: Simon &Schuster.
  32. Latour B. (2018). Tracciare la rotta. Come orientarsi in politica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  33. Lester L. e Cottle S. (2009). Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication, 3: 17.
  34. O’Brien K., Eriksen S.E., Schjolden A. e Nygaard L.P. (2004). What’s in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research. CICERO Working Paper.
  35. Oels A. (2012). From ‘securitization’ of climate change to ‘climatization’ of the security field: comparing three theoretical perspectives. In: Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 185-205.
  36. Oliver-Smith A. (1999). What is a disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question. The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, 18-34.
  37. Osti G. (2019). Above, beside, under: three ways social technical disciplines can work together in the energy transition. In: Giardullo P., Pellizzoni L., Brondi S., a cura di, Connencting dots: multiple perspectives on socio-technical transition and social practices. Tecnoscienza, Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10, 2: 127-139.
  38. Schneider S.H. (2001). A constructive deconstruction of deconstructionists: a response to Demeritt. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 2: 338-344. DOI:10.1111/0004-5608.00246
  39. Selby J., Dahi O.S., Fröhlich C. e Hulme M. (2017). Climate change and the Syrian civil war revisited. Political Geography, 60: 232-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.05.007
  40. Slettebak R.T. (2012). Don’t blame the weather! Climate-related natural disasters and civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 49, 1: 163-176. DOI: 10.1177/0022343311425693
  41. Smith N. (1984). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. New York: Blackwell.
  42. Id. (2006). There’s not so much thing as a natural disaster, testo disponibile al sito: https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-natural-disaster.
  43. Steinberg T. (2006). Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America. Oxford University Press.
  44. Sunga L.S. (2011). Does climate change kill people in Darfur?. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 2, 1: 64-85. DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2011.01.04
  45. Swyngedouw E. (1996). The city as a hybrid: on nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7, 2: 65-80. DOI: 10.1080/10455759609358679
  46. Uggla Y. (2010). What is this thing called ‘natural’? The nature-culture divide in climate change and biodiversity policy. Journal of Political Ecology, 17, 1: 79-91. DOI: 10.2458/v17i1.21701
  47. Verhoeven H. (2011). Climate change, conflict and development in Sudan: global neo‐Malthusian narratives and local power struggles. Development and Change, 42, 3: 679-707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01707.x
  48. Whatmore S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces. London: Sage.
  49. Williams J. (2007). Thinking as natural: another look at human exemptionalism. Human Ecology Review, 130-139.
  50. Wisner B., Gaillard J.C. e Kelman I. (2015). Disaster Risk. London: Routledge.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...