Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli

N. 1 (2023)

Immagini e città: fotografia e video come dispositivi critici

  • Francesca Governa
  • Samuele Pellecchia
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa1-2023oa15436
Inviata
15 febbraio 2023
Pubblicato
08-03-2023

Abstract

Come fare ricerca, e pensare, con le immagini? Come usare le immagini per trasformare la comprensione della città e qual è il contributo che il linguaggio visivo può fornire per incrinare il modo di guardare la realtà (urbana), aprire nuove interpretazioni, cambiare il nostro sguardo e la nostra visione delle cose? L’articolo riflette su queste domande ricostruendo criticamente la stretta relazione fra immagini e città e il modo in cui la rappresentazione videofotografica della città dialoga con il cambiamento del modo di pensare, concettualizzare e conoscere l’urbano, per poi discutere se e come produrre fotografie e video nel percorso di ricerca, e quindi studiare lo spazio urbano attraverso la camera e ri-guardare lo spazio urbano fotografato e filmato, sia un modo per affermare e praticare un approccio critico allo studio della città. Presentando alcuni esempi di ricerca in campo urbano che hanno prodotto immagini (fotografie e video), l’articolo si concentra quindi sulle potenzialità del linguaggio visivo nella ricerca urbana con l’obiettivo di esplorare le possibilità di una more-than textual research che, riconoscendo il portato teorico e interpretativo delle immagini, usi le fotografie e i video come dispositivi critici per superare le chiusure, i limiti e le aporie delle visioni mainstream dell’urbano e costruire un dialogo, per tanti versi tutto da immaginare, fra critical visual methodologies e critical urban theory. 

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Amin A. e Lancione M. (2022). Introduction: Thinking Cities from the Ground. In: Amin A. e Lancione M., a cura di, Grammars of the urban ground. London: Duke.
  2. Id. e Thrift N. (2005). Città. Ripensare la dimensione urbana. Bologna: il Mulino (ed. or. 2001).
  3. Id. e Id. (2020). Vedere come una città. Milano: Mimesis (ed. or. 2017).
  4. Anderson B. e Harrison P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In: Anderson B. e Harrison P., a cura di, Taking-place: non-representational theories and geography. Farnham: Ashgate.
  5. Aranbidoo P. e Delory C. (2020). Photography as Urban Narrative. City, 24(1-2): 407-422. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1739413
  6. Arnold E. (2021). Photography, Composition, and the Ephemeral City. Area, 53(4): 659-670. DOI: 10.1111/area.12725
  7. Aru S., Jampaglia C., Memoli M. e Puttilli M. (2018). L’emozione di uno spazio quotidiano. Parole, racconti, immagini di Sant’Elia - Cagliari. Verona: OmbreCorte.
  8. Azoulay A. (2010). What is a Photograph? What is Photography?. Philosophy of Photography, 1(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.1386/pop.1.1.9/7
  9. Ead. (2019), Potential History. Unlearning Imperialism. London: Verso.
  10. Barthes R. (2003), La camera chiara. Nota sulla fotografia. Torino: Einaudi (ed. or. 1981).
  11. Benjamin W. (2015). Piccola storia della fotografia. Milano: Abscondita (ed. or. 1931).
  12. Id. (2018). Esperienza e povertà. Roma: Castelvecchi (ed. or. 1933).
  13. Id. (1998). L’opera d’arte nell’epoca della sua riproducibilità tecnica. Arte e società di massa. Torino: Einaudi (ed. or. 1955).
  14. Bignante E. (2011). Geografia e ricerca visuale. Strumenti e metodi. Bari: Laterza.
  15. Boman C. (2019). At Home in the Victorian City? Revisiting Thomas Annan and the Social Contexts of Early Urban Photography. History of Photography, 43(1): 27-46. DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2019.1600860
  16. Brenner N. (2009). What is critical urban theory?. City, 13.2/3: 198-207. DOI: 10.1080/13604810902996466
  17. Id. e Schmid C. (2014). The ‘Urban Age’ in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3): 731-755. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12115
  18. Clarke D., a cura di (1997). The Cinematic City. London: Routledge.
  19. Clarke G. (1997). The photograph. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  20. Crang M. (1997), Picturing practices: research through the tourist gaze. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3): 359-373. DOI: 10.1191/030913297669603510
  21. Id. (2003). The Hair in the Gate: Visuality and the Geographical Knowledge. Antipode 35(2): 238-243. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00321
  22. Id. (2010). Visual Methods and Methodologies. In: DeLyser D., Herbert S., Aitken S., Crang M. e McDowell L. a cura di, The Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: Sage.
  23. D’Eramo M. (2017). Il selfie del mondo. Indagine sull’età del turismo. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  24. De Boeck F. e Plissard M.-F. (2004). Kinshasa. Tales of the Invisible City. Ghent: Ludion.
  25. Id. e S. Baloji (2016). Suturing the city. Living together in Congo’s urban worlds. London: Autograph ABP.
  26. De Certeau M. (1980). L’ invention du quotidien. Paris: Gallimard.
  27. Derickson D.K. (2015). Urban geography I: Locating urban theory in the ‘urban age’. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5): 647-657. DOI: 10.1177/0309132514560961
  28. Doel M.A. e Clark D.B. (2007). Afterimages. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5): 890-910. DOI: 10.1068/d436t
  29. Doucet B. (2019). Repeat photography and urban change. City, 23(4): 411-438. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1684039
  30. Driver F. (2003). On Geography as a Visual Discipline. Antipode, 35(2): 227-231. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00319
  31. Eliade M. (2006). Il sacro e il profano. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri (ed. or. 1957).
  32. Farinelli, F. (1992). I segni del mondo: immagine cartografica e discorso geografico in età moderna. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  33. Id. (2003). Geografia. Un’ introduzione ai modelli del mondo. Torino: Einaudi.
  34. Id. (2009). La crisi della ragione cartografica. Torino: Einaudi.
  35. Foucault M. (2015). Qu’est-ce que la critique? Suivi de La culture de soi. Paris: Vrin (ed. or. 1978).
  36. Gandy M. (2009). Liquid city: reflections on making a film. Cultural Geographies, 16(3): 408-503. DOI: 10.1177/1474474009105055
  37. Id. (2021). Film as Method in the Geohumanities. Geohumanities, 7(2): 605-624. DOI: 10.1080/2373566X.2021.1898287
  38. Id. (2022). Natura urbana: urban constellations in urban space. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
  39. Garrett B.L. (2011). Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4): 521-541. DOI: 10.1177/0309132510388337
  40. Gilardi A. (2000). Storia sociale della fotografia. Milano: BrunoMondadori.
  41. Ginzburg C. (1979). Spie. Radici di un paradigma indiziario. In: Gargani A., a cura di, Crisi della ragione. Nuovi modelli nel rapporto fra sapere e attività umane. Torino: Einaudi.
  42. Hall T. (2008). The camera never lies? Photographic research methods in Human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(3): 453-462. DOI: 10.1080/03098260902734992
  43. Harvey D. (2003). Paris, Capital of Modernity. London: Routledge.
  44. Hawker R. (2013). Repopulating the Street: Contemporary Photography and Urban Experience. History of Photography, 37(3): 341-352. DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2013.798521
  45. Hawkins H. (2012). Geography and Art. An Expanding Field: Site, the Body and Practice. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1): 52-71. DOI: 10.1177/0309132512442865
  46. Ead. (2015). Creative geographic methods: knowing, representing, intervening. On composing place and page. Cultural Geographies 22(2): 247-268. DOI: 10.1177/1474474015569995
  47. Hunt M. (2014). Urban Photography/Cultural Geography: Spaces, Objects, Events.
  48. Geography Compass, 8(31): 151-168. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12120
  49. Jacobs Jane (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
  50. Jacobs Jessica (2016a). Filmic Geographies: The Rise of Digital Film as a Research Method and Output. Area, 48(4): 452-454. DOI: 10.1111/area.12309
  51. Ead. (2016b). Visualising the visceral: using film to research the ineffable. Area, 48(4): 480-487. DOI: 10.1111/area.12198
  52. Jacobs S. (2006). Amor Vacui: Photography and the image of the empty city. History of Photography, 30(2): 107-118. DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2006.10442853
  53. Jazeel T. (2018). Singularity. A manifesto for incomparable geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40: 5-21. DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12265
  54. Krauss R. (2000). Teoria e storia della fotografia. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  55. Lancione M. (2017a). Revitalising the uncanny: Challenging inertia in the struggle against forced evictions. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 35(6): 1012-1032. DOI: 10.1177/0263775817701731
  56. Id. (2017b). Micropolitical entanglements: Positioning and matter. Environment &Planning D: Society and Space, 35(4): 574-578. DOI: 10.1177/0263775817710090
  57. Id. (2022). Inhabiting Dispossession in the Post-Socialist City: Race, Class and the Plan in Bucharest, Romania. Antipode, 54(4): 1141-1165. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12821
  58. Latham A. e McCormack D.P. (2009). Thinking with Images in Non-Representational Cities: Vignettes from Berlin. Area, 41(3): 252-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00868.x
  59. Lawton P., Till K.E., Jasper S., Vasudevan A., Dümpelmann S., Flitner M., Beach M., Nash C. e Gandy M. (2019). Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin. The AAG Review of Books, 7(3): 214-227. DOI: 10.1080/2325548X.2019.1615328
  60. Lefebvre H. (1958). Critique de la vie quotidienne. Paris: l’Arche.
  61. Lorimer J. (2010). Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17(2): 237-258. DOI: 10.1177/1474474010363853
  62. Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2/3): 185-197. DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982177
  63. McKittrick K. (2006). Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  64. Mennel B. (2008). Cities and Cinema. London: Routledge.
  65. Metz C. (1985). Photography and Fetish. October, 34: 81-90. DOI: 10.2307/778490
  66. Mitchell W.J.T. (1994). Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  67. Newhall N. (1952). The Caption: the Mutual Relation of Words/Photographs. Aperture, 1(1): 17-29.
  68. Olsson G. (2007). Abysmal. A critique of cartographical reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  69. Paterson M. e Glass M.R. (2020). Seeing, feeling, and showing ‘bodies-in-place’: exploring reflexivity and the multisensory body through videography. Social and Cultural geography, 21(1): 1-24. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2018.1433866
  70. Pink S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.
  71. Rizov V. (2019). The Photographic City. City, 23(6): 774-791. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1718411
  72. Robinson J. (2003). Postcolonialising geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(3): 273-289. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9493.00159
  73. Ead. (2006). Ordinary cities. Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
  74. Rorty R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  75. Rose G. (1993). Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  76. Ead. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3): 305-320. DOI: 10.1191/030913297673302122
  77. Ead. (2001). Visual Methodologies, London: Sage (4a ed. 2016).
  78. Ead. (2003). On the Need to ask how, exactly, is Geography Visual. Antipode 35(2): 212-221. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00317
  79. Ead. (2008). Using photographs as illustrations in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1): 151-160. DOI: 10.1080/03098260601082230
  80. Ead. (2014). Visual Culture, Photography and the Urban: An Interpretive Framework. Space and Culture, India, 2(3): 4-13. DOI: 10.20896/saci.v2i3.92
  81. Roy A. (2016). What is Urban about Critical Urban Theory? Urban Geography, 37(6): 810-823. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105485
  82. Ruddick S., Peake L., Tanyildiz G.S. e Patrick D. (2018). Planetary Urbanization: an urban theory for our time? Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 36(3): 387-404. DOI: 10.1177/0263775817721489
  83. Ryan J.R. (2003). Who’s afraid of Visual Culture?. Antipode 35(2): 232-237. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00320
  84. Sayer A. (1984). Defining the urban. Geojournal, 9: 279-285. DOI: 10.1007/BF00149040
  85. Schwartz J.M. e Ryan J.R. a cura di (2003). Picturing Place. Photography and the Geographical Imagination. London: I.B. Tauris.
  86. Scott J.C. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  87. Simmel G. (2001). La metropoli e la vita dello spirito. Roma: Armando (ed. or. 1903).
  88. Simone A. (2019). Maximum exposure: Making sense in the background of extensive urbanization. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 37(6): 990-1006. DOI: 10.1177/0263775819856351
  89. Sontag S. (2004). Sulla fotografia. Torino: Einaudi (ed. or. 1977).
  90. Tedlock D. (2011). Toward an Archeology of Architecture: An Experiment in Photowriting. Etnofoor, 23(1): 105-123.
  91. Thrift N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
  92. Tormey J. (2012). Cities and Photography. London: Routledge.
  93. Vassallo J. (2019). Epics in the Everyday – Photography, Architecture, and the Problem of Realism. Zurich: Park Books.
  94. Wigoder M. (2001). Some thoughts about street photography and the everyday. History of Photography, 25(4): 368-378. DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2001.10443239
  95. Williams N. (2006). Creative Processes: From Interventions in Art to Intervallic Experiments through Bergson. Environment & Planning A, 48(8): 1549-1564. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16642769
  96. Wyly E. (2010). Things Pictures don’t tell us: in search of Baltimore. City, 14(5): 497-528. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2010.512436
  97. Zimmerman C. (2014). Photographic Architecture in the Twentieth Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...