Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi e ricerche

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Transformative and innovative teaching processes in Higher Education: Fostering education for sustainability

Virtual English LAB: The Impact of Virtual Worlds on English Language Learning and Life Skills in Higher Education

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa1-2025oa20579
Submitted
luglio 7, 2025
Published
2025-07-11

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of immersive three-dimensional virtual environments on language learning and professional skills development in Higher Education. Grounded in constructivist and socio-cultural pedagogies, the research explores the implementation of the English LAB Virtual World – FrameVR-based educational platform – within two university-level English language laboratory courses for future primary school teachers. Adopting a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods design, the study analyzes learning outcomes, motivation, life skills, and perceived usability through validated tools: Cambridge Assessment-aligned tests (A2/B1), the MSLQ, the LiSST scale, and the SUS questionnaire. The experimental group, engaged in blended learning within the immersive environment, demonstrated statistically significant improvements in grammar, vocabulary, listening, and speaking skills (p < 0.001), alongside enhanced intrinsic motivation and substantial growth in life skills domains such as critical thinking, collaboration, and self-efficacy. Correlational analyses revealed strong associations between perceived usability, motivation, and transversal skills development. Qualitative data from focus groups further confirmed the transformative nature of immersive learning, emphasizing engagement, agency, and collaborative dynamics. The findings support the potential of Virtual Worlds to function not only as linguistic learning platforms but also as pedagogical ecosystems for developing 21st-century competencies. This research contributes to the evolving paradigm of the Eduverse, suggesting that virtual environments – when purposefully designed and pedagogically structured –can act as strategic enablers of inclusive, student-centered, and transformative learning in Higher Education.

References

  1. Bevilacqua, A., & Filippone, A. (2023). Divulgazione scientifica e didattica della Microbiologia. Un modello di didattica innovativa in una scuola secondaria di primo grado. MeTis-Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni, 13(2), 68-84.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  3. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189-194). London: Taylor & Francis.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  5. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69. Doi: 10.1126/science.1167311.
  6. Filippone, A., Montepeloso, E. A., Leone, R., & Bevilacqua, A. (2023/a). Cooperative learning in virtual worlds: An innovative teaching and learning experience for STEAM education. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 100-113.
  7. Filippone, A., Ferulli, M., & Bevilacqua, A. (2023). Virtual Worlds and Eduverse: A reflection on the body, space and learning in the metaverse. Giornale Italiano di Educazione alla Salute, Sport e Didattica Inclusiva, 7(3). Doi: 10.32043/gsd.v7i3.983.
  8. Filippone, A., Barbieri, U., Di Fuccio, R., De Carlo, M. E., & Marsico, E. (2024). Teaching and Learning in 3D Virtual Worlds integrated with Intelligent Tutoring Systems: New perspectives for Virtual Reality, Eduverse and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Education Sciences & Society, 2: 298-313. Doi: 10.3280/ess2-2024oa18448.
  9. Grivokostopoulou, F., Kovas, K., & Perikos, I. (2020). The effectiveness of embodied pedagogical agents and their impact on students learning in virtual worlds. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1739. Doi: 10.3390/app10051739.
  10. International Youth Foundation. (2022). Life Skills Survey Tool (LiSST). -- Retrieved from https://iyfglobal.org.
  11. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 81. Doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00081.
  12. Kennedy, F., Pearson, D., Brett-Taylor, L., & Talreja, V. (2014). The Life Skills Assessment Scale: Measuring life skills for the disadvantaged. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 197-210. Doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.197.
  13. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033.
  14. Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
  15. Pearson, D., Kennedy, F., Talreja, V., Bhat, S., & Newman-Taylor, K. (2020). The Life Skills Assessment Scale: Norms for young people aged 17-19 and 20-22 years. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(4), 1-15.
  16. Peterson, M. (2016). The use of virtual worlds in language learning: A review of the literature. In T. Sylvia (Ed.), Virtual Worlds for Language Learning: From Theory to Practice (pp. 13-30). Peter Lang.
  17. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
  18. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778.
  19. Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. In: Punie, Y. (ed). EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Doi: 10.2760/159770.
  20. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 196-209.
  22. Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  23. World Health Organization, WHO (1997). Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools. Geneva.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...