Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi e ricerche

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Instructional innovation and transformative processes in STEAM

Virtual School: Learning to Teach Physics in a Virtual Community of Practice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/exioa2-2023oa16807
Submitted
novembre 17, 2023
Published
2023-12-13

Abstract

This research explores the impact a Virtual Community of Practice (VCoP) within the international Virtual School pilot project aimed at providing future secondary-school physics teachers with authentic teaching experiences. The Virtual School serves as a platform to connect future teachers with real schools and pupils, creating a unique educational environment to develop professional identity and competencies. This paper reports on part of the project engaging eight preservice or early-career teachers, two mentors, three researchers, and forty-eight secondary school pupils. Pre and post semi-structured interviews were employed to collect data, exploring the participants’ experiences and perceptions. The findings reveal significant impacts of the VCoP on the understanding of professional identity and the disciplinary teacher practices of participants. By participating in this digital community, they have developed expertise, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-classroom dynamics. This study highlights the potential of VCoPs to shape the training of secondary-school physics teachers, offering new avenues for teacher education in the digital age.

References

  1. Avraamidou, L. (2014). Studying science teacher identity: current insights and future research directions. Studies in Science Education 50(2), 145-179. Doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.937171.
  2. Bjurholt, N., & Bøe, M. V. (2023). Remote physics teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: losses and potential gains. Physics Education, 58, 015004. Doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac96be.
  3. Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R.-M. (2021). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Burkholder, E., Salehi, S., Sackeyfio, S., Mohamed-Hinds, N., & Wieman, C. (2022). Equitable approach to introductory calculus-based physics courses focused on problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research 18, 020124. Doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020124.
  5. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967.
  6. Cleveland-Innes, M. (2019). The community of inquiry theoretical framework: Designing collaborative online and blended learning. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 85-102). Routledge.
  7. Criswell, B. A., Rushton, G. T., Nachtigall, D., Staggs, S., Alemdar, M., Cappelli, C. J. (2018). Strengthening the vision: Examining the understanding of a framework for teacher leadership development by experienced science teachers. Science Education 102, 1265-1287. Doi: 10.1002/sce.21472.
  8. Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6, 020110. Doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020110.
  9. Etkina, E., Gregorcic, B., & Vokos, S. (2017). Organizing physics teacher professional education around productive habit development: A way to meet reform challenges. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13, 010107. Doi. 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010107.
  10. Farmer, H., & Ramsdale, J. (2016). Teaching competencies for the online environment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(3), 1-17.
  11. Fischer, H.E., & Kauertz, A. (2021). Professional competencies for teaching physics. In H.E. Fischer & R. Girwidz (Ed.). Physics Education. Challenges in Physics Education (pp. 25-53). Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87391-2_2.
  12. Frågåt, T., Henriksen, E. K., & Tellefsen, C. W. (2021). Pre-service science teachers’ and in-service physics teachers’ views on the knowledge and skills of a good teacher. Nordic Studies in Science Education (NorDiNa) 17(3), 277-292. Doi: 10.5617/nordina.7644.
  13. Fullan, M. (2020). Learning and the pandemic: What’s next?. Prospects, 49(1-2), 25-28. Doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09502-0.
  14. Ghamrawi, N. (2021). Teachers’ virtual communities of practice: A strong response in times of crisis or just another Fad?. Education and Information Technology 27, 5889-5915. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10857-w.
  15. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  16. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72.
  17. Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as Context: The Role of School Subjects in Secondary School Teaching. Educational Researcher 24(8), 5-23. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X024008005.
  18. Hadar, L. L., O., Ergas, Alpert, B., & Ariav, T. (2020). Rethinking teacher education in a VUCA world: preservice teachers’ social-emotional competencies during the Covid-19 crisis. European Journal of Teacher Education 43(4), 573-586. Doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1807513.
  19. Kavanagh, S. S., Conrad, J., & Dagogo-Jack, S. (2020). From rote to reasoned: Examining the role of pedagogical reasoning in practice-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 69-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102991.
  20. Kirkby, J., Walsh, L., & Keary, A. (2018). A case study of the generation and benefits of a community of practice and its impact on the professional identity of early childhood teachers. Professional Development in Education 45(2), 264-275. Doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1449003.
  21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355.
  22. Levy, S., Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B.-S. (2022). Professional growth of physics teacher-leaders in a Professional Learning Communities program: the context of inquiry-based laboratories. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20, 1813-1839.
  23. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica 22(3), 276-282.
  24. McLaughlan, T. (2021) Facilitating factors in cultivating diverse online communities of practice: A case of international teaching assistants during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 38(2), 177-195. Doi: 10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0074.
  25. Milner-Bolotin, M. (2018). Evidence-Based Research in STEM Teacher Education: From Theory to Practice. Frontiers in Education 3(92). Doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00092.
  26. Murtagh, L., & Rushton, E. A. C. (2023). The role of teacher educator virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) in mobilising policy engagement: A case study of the initial teacher training market review from England. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. Doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2023.2191306.
  27. Nadeau, M., Modir, B., Lock, R. M., & Newton, W. G. (2020). Participation in an online community of high school physics teachers. In Wolf, S., Bennett, M. B., & Frank, B. W. (Eds.). 2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 370-375). Doi: 10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Nadeau.
  28. O’Brien, D. J. (2021). A guide for incorporating e-teaching of physics in a post-COVID world. American Journal of Physics 89, 403. Doi: 10.1119/10.0002437.
  29. O'Brien, A., & Fuller, R. (2018). Synchronous teaching techniques from the perspective and observation of virtual high school teachers: An investigative study. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 14(3), 55-67.
  30. Oshima, J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2021). Learning analytics for a new epistemological perspective of learning. Information and Technology in Education and Learning, 1(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.12937/itel.1.1.Inv.p003.
  31. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools. Free Press.
  32. Phillips, M., Kovanović, V., Mitchell, I., & Gašević, D. (2019). The Influence of Discipline on Teachers’ Knowledge and Decision Making. In B. Eagan, M. Misfeldt, & A. Siebert-Evenstone (Eds.), Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (pp. 177-188). Springer International Publishing. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_15.
  33. Phillips, M., Trevisan, O., Carli, M., Mannix, T., Gargiso, R., Gabelli, L. & Lippiello, S. (2023). Uncovering patterns and (dis)similarities of preservice teachers through Epistemic Network Analysis. In E. Langran, P. Christensen & J. Sanson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1021-1030). New Orleans, LA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). -- Retrieved September 11, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/221960.
  34. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union.
  35. Salazar López, T. I., & Nardi, R. (2020). Imaginários de futuros professores de física sobre os saberes docentes: sentidos produzidos na interface universidade-escola no estágio curricular supervisionado. Investigações Em Ensino De Ciências, 25(3), 454-470. Doi: 10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n3p454.
  36. Shaffer, D. W. (2006a). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education 46(3), 223-234. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.003.
  37. Shaffer, D. W. (2006b). How computer games help children learn. Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9-45. Doi: 10.18608/jla.2016.33.3.
  39. Ulla, M. B. & Perales, W. F. (2021). Emergency remote teaching during COVID19: The role of teachers’ online Community of Practice (CoP) in times of crisis. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1(9), 1-11. Doi: 10.5334/jime.617.
  40. Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E., (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education 61, 47-59. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001.
  41. Wei, B., Avraamidou, L. & Chen, N. (2021). How a beginning science teacher deals with practical work: an explorative study through the lens of identity. Research in Science Education 51, 1-19. Doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9826-z.
  42. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...