Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli/Articles

V. 10 N. 1 (2019): Disabilità e Qualità della Vita: percorsi e progetti per l’inclusione universitaria e sociale

A Model Program for the Success of College Students with Attention and Learning Disorders

Inviata
22 febbraio 2019
Pubblicato
13-06-2019

Abstract

Internationally, institutions of higher education have been called upon to engage college students with learning disabilities in campus life, to provide effective learning supports, and to hold high expectations (Tinto, 2012). Model programs providing comprehensive support to college students with learning disabilities are few and far between. As the number of college students needing learning support increases across many countries, there is a critical demand to identify programs and approaches that produce optimal outcomes for students. This article provides an overview of the legal structures on which supports for individuals with disabilities are based in the United States in comparison to Italy.
For nearly forty years, a U.S. program called Strategic Alternative Learning Techniques (SALT) Center has extended federally mandated supports in to higher education. As Italy grows its tertiary programs and supports for students with learning disabilities, the SALT Center may serve as a helpful model program.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Ales E. (2005). Disability in Italy: The legal concept. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 24: 609-630.
  2. American Psychological Association (n.d.). Campus Mental Health. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/advocacy/higher-education/mental-health/index.aspx.
  3. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. P.L. No. 101-336, (1990).
  4. Belch H.A. (Ed.) (2000). Serving students with disabilities: New directions for student services. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Bollman K.A., Silberglitt B., & Gibbons K.A. (2007). The St. Croix River education district model: Incorporating systems-level organization and a multi-tiered problem solving process for intervention delivery. In S.R. Jimerson, M.K. Burns, & A.M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 319-330). New York, NY: Springer.
  6. Boyle C.A., Boulet S., Schieve L.A., Cohen R.A., Blumberg S.J., Yeargin-Allsopp M., & Kogan M.D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in U.S. children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127(6):1034-42.
  7. Brown A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1). (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Canevaro A., Anna L. (2010). The historical evolution of school integration in Italy: Some witnesses and considerations. Alter, 4(3): 203-216.
  9. Davis L. (2015). Where’s the outrage when colleges discriminate against students with disabilities?. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 61. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Where-s-the-Outrage-When/231799.
  10. Davis III T.E., Nida R.E., Zlomke K.R., & Nebel-Schwalm M.S. (2009). Health-related quality of life in college undergraduates with learning disabilities: The mediational roles of anxiety and sadness. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31: 228-234.
  11. Duncan A., Ali R. (2011). Students with disabilities preparing for post-secondary education: Know your rights and responsibilities. US Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (www.ed.gov/answers).
  12. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. (IDEA). (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. 34, CFR Part 99) (1974).
  13. Flavell J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34: 906-911.
  14. Forgas D. & Tardi R. (2014). Introduction: Disability rights and wrongs in Italy. Modern Italy, 19(2): 113-119.
  15. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. 20 U.S.C. (2004).
  16. Ifenthaler D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1): 38-52.
  17. Kuh G.D., Schuh J.H., Whitt E.J., Andreas R., Lyons J.W., Strange C.C., … MacKay K.A. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and personal development outside the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. O’Connor R.E., Bocian K.M., Beach K.D., & Sanchez V. (2013). Special education in a 4 year response to intervention (RtI) environment: Characteristics of students with learning disabilities and grade of identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28: 98-112.
  19. Palombi B.J. (2000). Recruitment and admission of students with disabilities. In A. Belch (Ed.). Serving students with disabilities: New direction for student services (pp. 31-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
  20. Pullen P.C. (2017). Prevalence of LD from parental and professional perspectives: A comparison of the data from the national survey of children’s health and the office of special education programs’ reports to congress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6): 701-711.
  21. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 U.S.C. (1973).
  22. SALT Center Fact Book. (2018) Retrieved from https://www.salt.arizona.edu/about/fact-book.
  23. Sandri P. (2014). Integration and inclusion in Italy. Towards a special pedagogy for inclusion. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research, 8: 92-104.
  24. Sanford C., Newman L., Wagner M., Cameto R., Knokey A. M., & Shaver D. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
  25. Schiffrin H.H., Liss M., Miles-McLean H., Geary K.A., Erchull M.J., & Tashner T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23: 548-557.
  26. Strange C.C., & Banning J.H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus environments that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Thomas S.B. (2000). College students and disability law. The Journal of Special Education, 33(4): 248-257.
  28. Tinto V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  29. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). Attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/data.html.
  30. United States National Center for Education Statistics (2018). Children and youth with disabilities. Retrieved from https://academized.com/students-with-disabilities.
  31. University of Arizona Student Affairs & Enrollment Management / Academic Initiatives & Student Success Data Byte (2017) Retrieved from https://mailchi.mp/5ff74c0eb7ba/data-byte-ua-online-advancing-undergraduateenrollment-growth-with-distinguished-national-recognition-789625.
  32. University of Arizona Fact Book (2018) Retrieved from http://factbook.arizona.edu/2017-18/students/ret_grad.
  33. University of Arizona Strategic Plan (2018). Retrieved from https://strategicplan.arizona.edu.
  34. van der Stel M., & Veenman M.V. (2010). Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3): 220-224.
  35. Veenman M.V., Kerseboom L., & Imthorn C. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availability versus production deficiencies. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 13(4): 391-412.
  36. Veenman M.V., Van Hout-Wolters B.H., & Afflerbach P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1): 3-14.
  37. Wang M.C., Haertel G.D., & Walberg H.J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1): 30-43.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...