Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 7 No. 1 (2016): ESS - Inclusion. Context, processes and practices

Does the school inclusion really work?

giugno 2, 2016


This article aims to take stock of the research aimed to evaluate the inclusive processes, referring to investigations carried out both in Italy and in international contexts on issues that may have important repercussions on the current organization of the Italian school. Through four key questions (How are we working? Which results have been obtained? What gives the best results? Are more inclusive schools also more efficient?) the authors develop a reflection useful to provide application support for both those who work every day in the school and those who are called to make decisions on organizational policies, as fundamental to promote inclusive and oriented to the maximum educational success of all students schools.

evidence-based education; special education; inclusion; special educational needs; efficacy research


  1. • Access Economics (2009). An economic analysis of the proposed ECEC National Quality Agenda: A report for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Access Economics, Canberra. DOI: 10.1007/bf03173412
  2. • Ainscow, M., César, M. (2006). Inclusive education ten years after Salamanca: Setting the agenda. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21: 231-238.
  3. • Allen, G, and Smith, I.D (2008). Early intervention: Good parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens. London: The Centre for Social Justice and The Smith Institute.
  4. • Anderson A., Hamilton R.J., Hattie J. (2004). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary school. Learning Environment Research, 7, 3: 211-225. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-004-3292-9
  5. • Associazione Treellle, Caritas Italiana, Fondazione Agnelli (2011). Gli alunni con disabilità nella scuola italiana: Bilancio e proposte, Trento: Erickson.
  6. • Bonaiuti G. (2013). Evidence Based Education: tecnologie per l’apprendimento. Form@re - Open Journal for network training, 13, 4: 1-4.
  7. • Booth T., Ainscow M. (2002). Index for Inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools, CSIE. Text available at the website: (trad. it. L’Index per l’inclusione, Gardolo: Edizioni Erickson, 2008).
  8. • Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., Parker, R. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42, 1: 39-55.
  9. DOI:10.1177/1098300715592355
  10. • Browder, D. M., Cooper-Duffy, K. (2003). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities and the requirements for accountability in No Child Left Behind in The Journal of Special Education, 37, 3: 157-163. DOI: 10.1177/00224669030370030501
  11. • Buckley, S. J., Bird, G., Sacks, B. (2006). Evidence that we can change the profile from a study of inclusive education. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9, 3: 51-53. DOI: 10.3104/essays.294
  12. • Calvani A. (2012). Per un’istruzione evidence based. Analisi teorico-metodologica internazionale sulle didattiche efficaci e inclusive. Trento: Erickson.
  13. • Canevaro A., D’Alonzo L., Ianes D. (2009). L’integrazione scolastica di alunni con disabilità dal 1977 al 2007. Bozen-Bolzano University Press.
  14. • Canevaro A., D’Alonzo L., Ianes D., Caldin R. (2011). L’integrazione scolastica nella percezione degli insegnanti. Trento: Erickson
  15. • Clark H. (2002). Building Education: the Role of the Physical Environment in Enhancing Teaching and Research. Issues in Practice. London: Institute of Education.
  16. • Cook, S. C, Rao, K., & Cook, B. G. (in press). Using Universal Design for Learning to personalize an evidence-based practice for students with disabilities. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools. Text available at the website: (Accessed: 26 April 2016).
  17. • Cottini L. (2002). Fare ricerca nella scuola dell’autonomia, Milano: Mursia.
  18. • Cottini L. (2008). Autismo e integrazione scolastica: l’intervento “abilitativo” sui problemi comportamentali. American Journal of Mental Retardation (Edizione italiana), 6, 2: 413-432.
  19. • Cottini L. (2016). Fare ricerca con singoli soggetti. Principi metodologici e applicazioni in educazione speciale e in psicologia clinica. Ottaviano: Irfid.
  20. • Cottini L. (2016a), Il paradigma dell’inclusione scolastica: un inquadramento. Giornale Italiano dei Disturbi del Neurosviluppo, 1, 1: 32-50.
  21. • Cottini L., Morganti A. (2015). Evidence-Based Education e pedagogia speciale. Principi e modelli per l’inclusione. Roma: Carocci.
  22. • Demeris H., Childs R.A., Jordan A. (2007). The influence of students with special needs included in grade-3 classrooms on the large-scale achievement scores of students without special needs. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 3: 609-627. DOI: 10.2307/20466655
  23. • Dorman J. (2001). Association between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environment Research, 4, 3: 243-257. DOI:10.1142/9789812774651_0001
  24. • Durlak J.A., Domitrovich C.E., Weissberg R.P., Gullotta T.P. (Eds). (2015). Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice. New York: Guilford.
  25. • Durlak J.A., Weissberg R. P., Dymnicki A. B., Taylor R.D., Schellinger K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of schoolbased universal interventions. Child Development, 82: 405–432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
  26. • Durst C.J. (2002). Family-centered practis: Birth throught hig school. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 3: 139-147. DOI: 10.1177/00224669020360030401
  27. • European Commission DGXXII (1996). The Charter of Luxembourg, Brussels: Belgium.
  28. • Eurydice (2015). The Teaching Profession in Europe. Practices, Perceptions and Policies. Text available at the website (Accessed 3 May 2016).
  29. • Farrell P. (2000). The impact of research on developments in inclusive education, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4: 153-162. DOI: 10.1080/136031100284867
  30. • Flynn L., Healy O. (2012). A review of treatments for deficits in social skills and self-help skills in autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1: 431–441. DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.06.016
  31. • Fox S., Southwell A., Stafford N., Goodhue R., Jackson D., Smith C. (2015). Better systems, better chances: A review of research and practice for prevention and early intervention, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY), Canberra, Text available at the website: resources/command/download_file/id/274/filename/Better-systems-better-chances.pdf (Accessed 10 February 2016).
  32. • Freeman S., Alkin M. (2000). Academic and social attainments of children with mental retardation in general education and special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 1: 3-18. DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100102
  33. • Gandhi A.G. (2007). Context matters: exploring relations between inclusion and reading achievement of students without disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 1: 91-112. DOI:10.1080/10349120601149797
  34. • Gherardini P., Nocera S., AIPD (2000). L’integrazione scolastica delle persone Down. Trento: Erickson.
  35. • Giangreco M.F. (2009). Opportunities for children and youth with intellectual developmental disabilities: Beyond genetics. Life Span and Disability, XII, 2: 129-139.
  36. • Giangreco M.F., Doyle M.B., Suter J.C. (2012). Demographic and personnel service delivery data: implications for including students with disabilities in Italian schools. Life Span and Disability, 15, 1: 97-123.
  37. • Guckert M., Mastropieri M.A., Scruggs T.E. (2016). Personalizing Research: Special Educators’ Awareness of Evidence-Based Practice, Exceptionality, 24, 2: 63-78. DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2014.986607
  38. • Harrison L.J., Goldfeld S., Metcalfe E., Moore T. (2012). Early learning programs that promote children’s developmental and educational outcomes, Resource sheet no. 15, produced for the Closing the Gap Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra and Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Text available at the website: (Accessed 11 March 2016).
  39. • Hattie J. (2009). Visible Learning: a Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, London-New York: Routledge.
  40. • Hattie J. (2011). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning, London-New York: Routledge
  41. • Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D. (2008). Effects of social development intervention in childhood 15 years later. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 162, 12: 1133-1141. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.162.12.1133
  42. • Heckman J.J. (2008). The case for investing in disadvantaged young children, in First Focus, Big ideas for children: Investing in our nation’s future, First Focus, Washington. Text available at the website: (Accessed 9 March 2016).
  43. • Heppel S., Chapman C., Millwood R., Constable M., Furness M.J. (2004). Building learning futures. A research project at Ultralab within the CABE / RIBA “Building Futures” programme. Text available at the website: (accessed: 29 March 2016).
  44. • Higgins S., Hall E., Wall K., Woolnera P., McCaughey C. (2005). The Impact of School Environments: A Literature Review. London: Design Council.
  45. • Hornby G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. London: Cassell.
  46. • ISTAT (2015). L’integrazione degli alunni con disabilità nelle scuole primarie e secondarie di I grado. Text available at the website: disabilità.pdf?title=integrazione+degli+alunni+con+disabilità+-+21%2fdic%2f2015++testo+integrale+e+nota+metodologica.pdf (Accessed 2 May 2016).
  47. • ISTAT (2016). Indagine sugli alunni con disabilità nella scuola primaria e secondaria di I grado statali e non statali. Text available at the website: (Accessed 2 May 2016).
  48. • Jepma I.J. (2003). De schoolloopbaan van risicoleerlingen in het primair onderwijs (The school career of pupils at risk in primary education). Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
  49. • Jones D.E., Greenberg M., Crowley M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, e1–e8. DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630.
  50. • Kalambouka A., Farrell P., Dyson A., Kaplan I. (2005). The impact of population inclusivity in schools on student outcomes. London: University of London, Centre for Evidence‐Informed Policy and Practice in Education. Text available at the website: (Accessed 12 January 2016).
  51. • Karsten S., Peetsma T., Roeleveld J., Vergeer M. (2001). The Dutch policy of integration put to the test: Differences in academic psychosocial development of pupils in special and mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16, 3: 193-205. DOI: 10.1080/08856250110074364
  52. • Katz J., Mirenda P. (2002). Including students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms: educational benefits. International Journal of Special Education, 17, 2: 14-25.
  53. • Kyndt E., Raes E., Lismont B., Timmers F., Dochy F., Cascallar E. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10: 133-149. DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
  54. • Lindsay G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77: 1-24. DOI: 10.1348/000709906x156881
  55. • Lindsay G. (2003). Inclusive education: A critical perspective. British Journal of Special Education, 30: 3-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8527.00275
  56. • Markussen E. (2004). Special education: does it help? A study of special education in Norwegian upper secondary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 1: 33-48. DOI: 10.1080/0885625032000167133
  57. • Mitchell D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  58. • Mitchell D. (2008). What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies. London and New York: Routledge
  59. • Myklebust J.O. (2002). Inclusion or exclusion? Transitions among special needs students in upper secondary education in Norway. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 3: pp. 251-263. DOI:10.1080/08856250210162158
  60. • Myklebust J.O. (2007). Diverging paths in upper secondary education: competence attainment among students with Special Educational Needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11, 2: 215-231. DOI: 10.1080/13603110500375432
  61. • Nepi L.D. (2013). Includere fa la differenza? Il punto alla luce delle evidenze empiriche. Form@re, 3, 13: 27-41. DOI:10.13128/formare-13625
  62. • Nind M., Sheehy K., Simmons K., Rix J. (2004). Inclusive Education: Diverse Perspectives. London: Fulton.
  63. • O’Connell M., Fox S., Hinz B., Cole H. (2016). Quality Early Education for All: Fostering, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable leaders. Mitchell Institute policy paper No. 01/2016. Mitchell Institute, Melbourne. Text available at the website: (Accessed 9 March 2016).
  64. • Parsons S., Guldberg K., MacLeod A., Jones G., Prunty A., Balfe T. (2011). International review of the evidence on best practice in educational provision for children on the autism spectrum, in European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26, 1: 47-63. DOI:10.1080/08856257.2011.543532
  65. • Payton J., Weissberg R.P., Durlak J.A., Dymnicki A.B., Taylor R.D., Schellinger K.B., Pachan M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific re- views. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
  66. • Weissberg R.P. (2015). Education to promote all students’ social, emotional, and academic competence in Feuer M.J., Berman A.I., Atkinson R.C. (Eds). Past as Prologue: The National Academy of Education at 50. Members Reflect. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
  67. • Ruijs N.M., Peetsma T.T.D. (2010). The presence of several students with Special Educational Needs in inclusive education and the functioning of students with Special Educational Needs. Educational Review, 62, 1: 1-37. DOI: 10.1080/00131910903469551
  68. • Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., De Ritter, M., Ben, J., Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49, 9: 892–909. DOI: 10.1002/pits.21641
  69. • Slavin R.E. (2008). Evidence-Based Reform in Education: what will it take? European Educational Research Journal. 7: 124-128. DOI: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.1.124
  70. • Soriano V. (2014). Five key messages for inclusive education. Putting Theory into Practice. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. Text available at the website (Accessed: 26 April 2016).
  71. • Szumski G., Firkowska-Mankiewicz A. (2010). Is Polish special education effective? Academic and socio-emotional effects of schooling in special, integrated and regular schools. The New Educational Review, 20, 1: 248-260.
  72. • Turnbull A.P., Turnbull H.R. (2001). Families, professionals and exceptionality. Collaborating for empowerment. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  73. • UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education, Paris: UNESCO.
  74. • UNESCO (2009). Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education, Paris: UNESCO.
  75. • United Nations (2006). Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities. Text available at the website: convention/conventionfull.shtml (Accessed: 26 April 2016).
  76. • Vianello, R. (2006). La sindrome di Down. Sviluppo psicologico e integrazione dalla nascita all’età senile. Bergamo: Junior.
  77. • Vianello R., Lanfranchi S. (2009). Genetic syndromes causing mental retardation: Deficit and surplus in school performance and social adaptability compared to cognitive functioning. Life Span and Disability, XII: 41-52.
  78. • Woolner P., Hall E., Higgins S., McCaugheya C., Wall K. (2007). A Sound Foundation? What We Know About the Impact of Environments on Learning and the Implications for Building School for the Future. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 1: 47-70. DOI: 10.1080/03054980601094693


Metrics Loading ...