Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articles/Articoli

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Special Education, Third Mission and Social Impact: Reflections and practices for an inclusive community

Profiles of students in STEM across Latin America and Europe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ess1-2024oa17421
Submitted
marzo 5, 2024
Published
2024-06-24

Abstract

The gender gap in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics is a problem that affects higher education institutions across the globe. Although some exceptions exist, such as Algeria, Benin, Oman or Myanmar (according to the Global Gender Gap Report 2022), women represent around 15% of STEM programs. The low number of women in these areas impacts the development of societies. STEM areas are crucial to solve society's problems and improving people's lives. However, half of the population (the females) is not represented in the teams that work to approach those problems. This work aims to analyse the profiles of current and past students from STEM programs in Latin American and European higher education institutions. We collected information about their motivations and concerns when they chose to enter university. We statistically analysed the differences finding that there are some significant ones. They mostly confirm the literature, showing that males and females have different views and approaches in the STEM field. Females look more for social aspects, while males tend to prioritise career perspectives. The findings suggest that there can be a mutual exchange of good practices between Latin American and European attraction campaigns thanks to the similarity found.

References

  1. Ballatore M.G., De Borger J., Misiewicz J., Tabacco A. (2020). ANNA Tool: a way to connect future and past students in STEM. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 15(4): 344-351.
  2. Bello A., Estébanez M.E. (2022). An unbalanced equation: Increasing participation of women in STEM in LAC (MTD/SC/2022/PI/01).
  3. Cheryan S., Siy J.O., Vichayapai M., Drury B. J., Kim S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?. Social psychological and personality science, 2(6): 656-664.
  4. Drury B. J., Siy J.O., Cherya, S. (2011). When do female role models benefit women? The importance of differentiating recruitment from retention in STEM. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4): 265-269.
  5. García-Holgado A., Camacho Díaz A., García-Peñalvo F.J. (2019). Engaging women into STEM in Latin America: W-STEM project. In: Conde-González M.Á., Rodríguez Sedano F.J., Fernández Llamas C., García-Peñalvo F.J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019) (pp. 232-239). ACM. Doi: 10.1145/3362789.3362902.
  6. García-Holgado A., García-Peñalvo F.J. (2022). A Model for Bridging the Gender Gap in STEM in Higher Education Institutions. In: García-Peñalvo F.J., García-Holgado A., Dominguez A., Pascual J. (Eds.). Women in STEM in Higher Education: Good Practices of Attraction, Access and Retainment in Higher Education (pp. 1-19). Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-1552-9_1.
  7. García-Holgado A., Mena J., García-Peñalvo F.J., Pascual J., Heikkinen M., Harmoinen S., García-Ramos L., Peñabaena-Niebles R., Amores L. (2020). Gender equality in STEM programs: a proposal to analyse the situation of a university about the gender gap. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), (27-30 April 2020, Porto, Portugal) (pp. 1824-1830). IEEE. Doi: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125326.
  8. García-Peñalvo F.J., Bello A., Domínguez A., Romero Chacón R.M. (2019). Gender Balance Actions, Policies and Strategies for STEM: Results from a World Café Conversation. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20(15). Doi: 10.14201/eks2019_20_a31.
  9. Herrmann S.D., Adelman R.M., Bodford J.E., Graudejus O., Okun M.A., Kwan V.S. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5): 258-268.
  10. Polcuch E.F. Brooks L.A., Bello A. (2018). Telling SAGA: Improving measurement and policies for gender equality in science, technology and innovation. SAGA Work. Paper 5, Paris France.
  11. Red Indices. (2021). Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Educación Superior -Red IndicES-. Testo disponibile alla pagina: http://www.redindices.org/.
  12. RICYT (2021). Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología-Iberoamericana e Interamericana- (RICYT). Available: http://www.ricyt.org/.
  13. Rintala U. et al. (2012). Knowing our students-different approaches to student retention experiences of the ATTRACT project. Proc. 40th SEFI Annu. Conf., Thessaloniki, Greece, 2012.
  14. Rittmayer M.A., Beier M.E. (2009). Self-Efficacy in STEM. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.). Applying Research to Practice (ARP) Resources. Available: http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx.
  15. UNESCO. Director-General 2009-2017 (2017). Cracking the code: girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO. Available: http://bit.ly/2k8nhns.
  16. United Nations. Goal 5: Achieve Gender Equality and Empower All Women and Girls. Accessed: Sep. 2019. Testo disponibile alla pagina: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/.
  17. World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021#report-nav.
  18. World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2021 – infographics. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021/infographics-ad8db6203f.
  19. W-STEM Consortium, “Profiles of people in STEM careers,” W-STEM D2.3.1 – Version 1.1. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/6815875. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6815875.
  20. W-STEM Project. ENGAGING WOMEN INTO STEM: Building the Future of Latin America. Accessed: 2019. [Online]. Available: https://wstemproject.eu/.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...