Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Regular Articles

Early View

Agricultural Development versus Environmental Sustainability: FDI, Carbon Emissions, and Global Warming in Vietnam's Economy: English

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2025oa20888
Submitted
agosto 25, 2025
Published
2025-12-12

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive examination of the environmental consequences of foreign direct investment (FDI) within Vietnam’s agri‑food sector, focusing on the tension between agricultural expansion and carbon emission control. In the context of rising global climate concerns, the analysis examines how FDI inflows affect CO2 emissions, while considering agricultural structural transformation, economic development, and trade openness. The results indicate that FDI significantly increases CO2 emissions, primarily through scale expansion and structural shifts toward emission-intensive agricultural activities. The findings underscore agricultural industrial restructuring as a crucial transmission channel. The study contributes both theoretically and practically by offering policy recommendations aimed at steering FDI toward cleaner agricultural development pathways and supporting Vietnam’s transition toward a low‑carbon and climate‑resilient agri‑food system.

References

  1. Cheng, Q., Song, Y., & Liu, M. (2022). Does FDI Promote the Optimization and Adjustment of the Industrial Structure? Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Test Based on the Dual Perspectives of Quality and Quantity. Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, 29(5), 23-37.
  2. Chen, Q. (2019). Research on the Factors Affecting China’s Direct Investment in Vietnam. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.
  3. Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2005). FDI and the capital intensity of ‘dirty’ sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 530-548. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00285.
  4. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755-787. Doi: 10.2307/2118421.
  5. Demena, B. A., & Afesorgbor, S. K. (2020). The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 138, 111192. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192.
  6. Deng Xiujie (2023). Status and Prospects of Energy Transition in the Five Countries of the Indo-China Peninsula. Crossroads: Southeast Asian Studies, 5, 100-110.
  7. Dong, F., & Zhang, X. (2018). Does FDI facilitate environmental regulation? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(14), 14047-14060. Doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1571-x.
  8. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. Doi: 10.3386/w3914.
  9. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. Doi: 10.2307/2118443.
  10. Hu Bentian, Shao Junqi (2022). Effect of FDI on carbon dioxide emission in China: an empirical study based on spatial Dubin and multiple threshold models. Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce, 42(5), 49-58.
  11. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2022). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2022: Overview. IEA Publications. -- https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissionsfrom-fuel-combustion-2022.
  12. Jia, Z., & Yang, X. (2020). The Relationship between FDI and Regional CO2 Emission: Dynamic Threshold Effect Based on Intellectual Property Protection. Journal of Technology Economics, 39(9), 101-109.
  13. Li, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5), 6234-6246. Doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10835-6.
  14. Liao, Y. (2020). Research on the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on China’s Carbon Emissions. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.
  15. Lu, Z., & Luo, Y. (2021). Spatial Spillover, Two-way FDI and Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensity. Journal of Technology Economics, 40(6), 102-111.
  16. Luan, Z., Zhang, B., & Wang, X. (2019). Does foreign trade affect CO2 emissions in the context of globalization? New evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 368-384. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.253.
  17. Nadeem, A. M., Majeed, M. T., & Zafar, A. (2020). Foreign direct investment, energy consumption, and environmental pollution nexus in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 34035-34047. Doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09782-4.
  18. Sapkota, P., & Bastola, U. (2017). Foreign Direct Investment, Income and Environmental Pollution in Developing Countries: Panel Data Analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 6, 238-247.
  19. Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 649, 128-145. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.276.
  20. Tran, T. H., & Le, V. D. (2023). Foreign Direct Investment in Agriculture and Environmental Consequences: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 345-362.
  21. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2023). National greenhouse gas inventory data for 1990-2021. -- https://unfccc.int/publications.
  22. Wang, F., Xu, L., & Wang, W. (2024). Review of Carbon Emission Accounting and System Dynamics. Sustainable Development, 14(1), 180-184.
  23. Wang, H., & Huang, B. (2017). Influence study on interaction of FDI environmental regulation and carbon emissions in the new normal. China Coal, 7, 147-152.
  24. Wang, X., He, F., & Zhu, Z. (2019). Impact of FDI on Environmental Quality of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 9, 45-52.
  25. World Bank (2023). World Development Indicators (WDI) database. -- https://data.worldbank.org.
  26. Wu, W., & Liu, P. (2021). The Interaction Between FDI and Carbon Emissions: an Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of 281 Prefecture-Level Cities. Business & Economy, 2, 117-120.
  27. Xing, Y., & Kolstad, C. D., (2002). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? University of California at Santa Barbara Economics Working Paper, 21(1), 1-22.
  28. Xiang, Y., & Dai, Q. (2022). The Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Spatial Spillover of Two-Way FDI Coordinated Development under the “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” Goals. Financial Economics Research, 37(2), 105-121.
  29. Yuan, P., & Cheng, S. (2011). Examining Kuznets Curve in Environmental Efficiency of China’s Industrial Sector. China Industrial Economics, 2, 79-88.
  30. Zarsky, L. (1999). Havens, halos and spaghetti: Untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. In: OECD (Ed.), Foreign direct investment and the environment (pp. 47-74). OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/9789264173710-en.
  31. Zhu, Y., Gao, H., & Xu, Y.(2022). How can the coordinated development of twoway FDI reduce regional CO2 emission intensity? Based on the mediating effect of enterprises’ green technology innovation and the regulating role of the government quality. Soft Science, 36(2), 86-94.
  32. Zou, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). The Impact of FDI on China’s Technology Innovation and High-quality Economic Development with the Constraints of Environmental Regulation: A Mechanism Test Based on the Mediation Effect and the Threshold Effect. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 13, 1-11.