Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Regular Articles

Vol. 22 No. 3 (2020)

Insights in overcoming the non-adoption of voluntary agricultural ghg mitigation measures in Ireland

dicembre 31, 2019


Agricultural Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in Ireland are projected to increase up to 21 Mt CO2eq by 2030 mainly driven by increased dairy cow numbers and increased nitrogen fertiliser use. In response to the growing public awareness of the GHG emissions’ environmental impact, the Irish government published the Climate Action Plan in 2019, which identifies the agricultural sector’s leading role in reducing GHG emission and increasing carbon removals to achieve the national GHG emission targets by 2030. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACCs) on Irish GHG emissions have projected the total technically feasible mitigation potential for the Irish agriculture, forestry and land use (AFOLU) sector to be sufficient enough to achieve the set targets by 2030. Although these mitigation measures are available and when implemented, would mostly lead to a win-win situation, the voluntary adaptation rate by farmers is low. This study addresses the most significant determinants of voluntary adoption of mitigation measures by systematically examining existing literature on how and to what extent non-price determinants affect
the voluntary adoption rate of technically feasible mitigation measures in the Irish afolu sector. The main identified nonprice determining factors were the degree of farmers’ awareness regarding man-made GHG emissions, receiving agrienvironmental advice, implementation costs, profitability and size of farms, land quality and the type of farm enterprise. Integrating the gained results in the former macc analysis enabled us to adopt the implementation rates of the cost-efficient afolu mitigation measures accordingly. The non-price determinants impact the voluntary uptake rate of AFOLU mitigation measures to the extent that the adjusted total Irish AFOLU abatement potential is 47% lower than technically feasible. Considering that 51.6% of the total estimated AFOLU abatement potential in 2030 is offset through Irish forestry, which at current afforestation rate will turn into a net carbon source by 2035, a significant gap occurs to any potential Irish and EU GHG reduction targets. To substantially help bring the nexus between agricultural development and GHG emission targets in Ireland closer together, policy measures, that differentiate between the different type of AFOLU mitigation measures, need to be implemented to enhance the uptake rate of cost-beneficial and cost-effective measures. This would have the potential to reduce the level of agricultural GHG emissions by 2030 in a way that it would converge towards possible EU and Irish GHG emission reduction targets.


  1. Arbuckle Jr, J.G., Prokopy, L.S., Haigh, T. et al. (2013). Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change, 117, 943-950, doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0707-6.
  2. Ajzen, I. & Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of Goal Directed Behaviour: Attitudes, Intentions and Perceived Behavioural Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474, doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.
  3. Bockel, L., Sutter, P., Touchemoulin, O. & Joensson, M. (2012). Using Marginal Abatement Cost Curves to Realize the Economic Appraisal of Climate Smart Agriculture Policy Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  4. Breen, J., Clancy, D., Ryan, M. & Wallace, M. (2010). Irish land use change and the decision to afforest: an economic analysis. Irish Forestry, 67, 6-20.
  5. Bruce, A. (2013). The lore of low methane livestock: Co-producing technology and animals for reduced climate change impact. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 9(10), doi: 10.1186%2F2195-7819-9-10.
  6. Buckley, C., Howley, P. & Jordan, P. (2015). The role of differing farming motivations on the adoption of nutrient management practices. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 4(4), 152-162, doi: 10.5836/ijam/2015-04-152.
  7. COFORD (2016). Land Availability for Afforestation – Exploring opportunities for expanding Ireland’s forest resource. coford Land Availability Working Group. COFORD, Dublin.
  8. CSO (2019). StatBank database. Central Statistics Office, CSO Statistical Databases. --
  9. DAFM (2010). Food Harvest 2020: A Vision for Irish Agri-food and fisheries. Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine, Dublin, Ireland. --
  10. DAFM (2015). Food Wise 2025: A ten year vision for the Irish agri-food industry. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Dublin, Ireland. --
  11. DAFM (2018). Annual Review and Outlook (2005-2018). Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Wexford, Ireland.
  12. DAFM (2018b). Ireland’s National Forest Inventory 2017 – Main Findings. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Wexford, Ireland.
  13. DAFM (2018c). Forest statistics Ireland 2018. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Wexford, Ireland.
  14. DCCAE(2017). National Mitigation Plan. Department of Communications, Climate Actions and Environment, Dublin, Ireland.
  15. DCCAE (2019). Climate Action Plan 2019. Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment, Dublin, Ireland.
  16. Dillon, E., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., Houlihan, T., Kinsella, A., Loughrey, J., McKeon, M., Moran, B. & Thorne, F. (2018). Outlook 2019 – Economic Prospects for Agriculture. Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Teagasc, Carlow.
  17. Duesberg, S., Upton, V., O’Connor, D. & NíDhubháin, A. (2014). Factors influencing Irish farmers’ afforestation intention. Forest Policy and Economics, 39, 13-20.
  18. Duffy, P., Black, K., Hyde, B., Ryan, A.M. & Ponzi, J. (2019). National inventory report Greenhouse gas emissions 1990-2016. Reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Environmental Protection Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
  19. EPA (2019). Ireland’s National Inventory Report 2019 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2017. Environmental Protection Agency, Dublin.
  20. EPA (2019b). Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projections 2018-2040. Environmental Protection Agency, Dublin, Ireland. --
  21. European Commission (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy – For a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system. European Green Deal, Brussels.
  22. European Council (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013, Official Journal of the European Union, L156/26, pp. 26-42. --
  23. Eurostat (2019). Eurostat Database.
  24. Farrelly, N. & Gallagher, G. (2015). The potential availability of land afforestation in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Forestry, 27, 120-138.
  25. FAO (2019). FAOSTAT statistical database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  26. Fleming, A. & Vanclay, F. (2010) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 11-19.
  27. Ghadim, A.A., Pannell, D.J. & Burton, M. (2005). Risk, uncertainty and learning in adoption of a crop innovation. Agricultural Economics, 33, 1-9, doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00433.x.
  28. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  29. Gray, E., Adenaeuer, L., Flaig, D. & van Tongeren, F. (2017). Evaluation of the relevance of border protection for agriculture in Switzerland. oecd Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 109, oecd Publishing, Paris.
  30. Hamilton-Webb, A., Manning, L., Naylor, R. & Conway, J. (2017). The relationship between risk experience and risk response: A study of farmers and climate change. Journal of Risk Research, 20, 1379-1393, doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1153506.
  31. Howley, P., O’Donoghue, C. & Heanue, K (2012). Factors Affecting Farmers’ Adoption of Agricultural Innovations: A Panel Data Analysis of the Use of Artificial Insemination among Dairy Farmers in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(6).
  32. Howley, P., Hynes, S., O’Donoghue, C., Farrelly, N. & Ryan, M. (2012b). Farm and farmer characteristics affecting the decision to plant forests in Ireland. Irish Forestry, 69, 32-42.
  33. Howley, P., Buckley, C., O’Donoghue & Ryan, M. (2015). Explaining the economic “irrationality” of farmers’ land use behaviour: The role of productivist attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits. Ecological Economics, 109, 186-193.
  34. IFFPA (2018). An overview of the Irish forestry and forest products sector 2017. Dublin, Ireland, Irish Forestry and Forest Products Association.
  35. IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. & Meyer, L.A. (Eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
  36. Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine (2018). Climate Change and Sustainability in the Agriculture and Food Sectors.
  37. Lau, P. (2019). Is carbon-neutral beef the future of Australia’s beef sector? Eco-Business, November.
  38. Lanigan, G. & Donnellan, T. (Eds.) (2018). An Analysis of Abatement Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Irish Agriculture 2021-2030. Teagasc, Carlow. --
  39. Lynch, J., Hennessy, T., Buckley, C. et al. (2016). Teagasc national farm survey 2015 sustainability report. Athenry, Co. Galway, Teagasc.
  40. Minviel, J. & Latruffe, L. (2017). Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results. Applied Economics, 49(2), 213-226, doi: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1194963.
  41. OECD (2012). Farmer Behaviour, Agricultural Management and Climate Change. Paris, OECD Publishing. --
  42. Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
  43. Russo, M. (2007). How to review a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N.Y.), 3(8), 637-642.
  44. Ryan, M. & O’Donoghue, C. (2016). Socio-economic drivers of farm afforestation decision-making. Irish Forestry, 73, 96-121.
  45. Ryan, M. & O’Donoghue, C. (2016b). Heterogeneous economic and behavioural drivers of the farm afforestation decision. Paper presented at bioecon 2016. Cambridge, UK. 14-16th September.
  46. Schulte, R.P.O., Crosson, P., Donnellan, T., Farrelly, N., Finnan, J., Lalor, S., Lanigan, G., O’Brien, D, Shalloo, L., Thorne, F. (2012). A Marginal Abatement Cost Curve for Irish Agriculture. Teagasc submission to the public consultation on Climate Policy development. Teagasc, Carlow. --
  47. Schulte, R.P.O. & Lanigan, G. (Eds.) (2011). Irish Agriculture, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change: opportunities, obstacles and proposed solutions. Teagasc submission to the proposed Government Climate Change Response Bill. Teagasc, Carlow. --
  48. Teagasc (2018). Teagasc National Farm Survey 2017 – Dairy Enterprise. Carlow, Ireland. --
  49. Teagasc (2018b). Forestry Programme 2014-2020, revised February 2018. Carlow, Ireland.
  50. Tzemi, D. & Breen, J. (2018). Climate change and the agricultural sector in Ireland: examining farmer awareness and willingness to adopt new advisory mitigation tools. Climate Policy, doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1546163.
  51. Tzemi, D. & Breen, J. (2019). Socio-economic factors affecting the adoption of GH emission abatement practices; the case of spring slurry spreading. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 8(1), 5-11.
  52. Wreford, A., Moran, D. & Adger, N. (2010). Climate Change and Agriculture: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation. oecd Publishing, Paris. --


Metrics Loading ...