Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1 (2024)

il Is gender a sustainability balance driver in football?

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/cgrds1-2024oa16926
Submitted
dicembre 6, 2023
Published
2024-04-17

Abstract

The paper focuses on the possibility that differences between men’s and female’s football (not only considering players’ physical attributes and technical performances, economic aspects as ticketing, sponsorships, tv rights, merchandising, but also behavioral insights) could lead clubs to enrich their CSR goals. Literature underlines how women’s football shows behavioral and psychological characteristics that make it unique and requires focus and tactics more tailored to the female interpretation of this sport. This could attract the segments of the market which care about cooperation, trust and inclusion without forgetting profitability: investing in females’ soccer could constitute, therefore, a way for football clubs to signal how much they care about inclusion and to improve their overall image. Moreover, educating girls to cope with a traditional “old boy game” like football could train them to better face situations of real world unfair competition. Results from an “ad hoc” built questionnaire handled to a sample of nonprofessional (male and female) football players hopefully will contribute to build up a “new model” of CSR in football.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos C., Shilbury D. (2013). Implementing corporate social responsi-bility in English football: Towards multi-theoretical integration. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 3(4): 268-284. DOI: 10.1108/SBM-05-2013-0009.
  2. Andersen S., Bulte E., Gneezy U., List J.A. (2008). Do women supply more public goods than men? Preliminary experimental evidence from matrilineal and patriarchal societies. American Economic Review, 98(2): 376-381. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.2.376.
  3. Benson P. (2017). Big football: Corporate social responsibility and the culture and color of injury in America’s most popular sport. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 41(4): 307-334. DOI: 10.1177/0193723517707699.
  4. Blumrodt J., Desbordes M., Bodin D. (2013). Professional football clubs and corporate social responsibility. Sport, business and management: an international journal, 3(3): 205-225. DOI: 10.1108/SBM-04-2011-0050.
  5. Bourg J.F., Gouguet J.J. (2007). Économie politique du sport professionnel: l’éthique à l’épreuve du marché. Vuibert, Paris.
  6. Bradish C., Cronin J.J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6): 691-697. DOI: 10.1123/jsm.23.6.691.
  7. Bradley P.S., Dellal A., Mohr M., Castellano J., Wilkie A. (2014). Gender differ-ences in match performance characteristics of soccer players competing in the UEFA Champions League. Human movement science, 33: 159-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.024.
  8. Carroll A.B. (1979). Corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
  9. Carroll A.B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2): 114-120. DOI: 10.5465/ame.2004.13836269.
  10. Carroll A.B., Buchholtz A.K. (2008). Educating students in corporate governance and ethics. In Swanson D.L., Fisher D.G. (Eds.). Advancing business ethics education, Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing, 285-304.
  11. Casarico A., Profeta P. (2015). Introduction to the Special Issue ‘The Determinants of Gender Gaps’. CESifo Economic Studies, 61(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu036.
  12. Chantelat P. (2001). De la corruption dans le sport: le faux crépuscule d’une idole. Le débat, (2): 125-139. DOI: 10.3917/deba.114.0125.
  13. Croson R., Gneezy U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2): 448-474. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448.
  14. Cunningham G.B., Fink J.S., Kenix L.J. (2008). Choosing an endorser for a wom-en’s sporting event: The interaction of attractiveness and expertise. Sex roles, 58: 371-378. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9340-z.
  15. Cunningham G.B., Lee W. (2016). Gender, sexism, sexual prejudice, and identification with US football and men’s figure skating. Sex Roles, 74: 464-471. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0598-x.
  16. de Araújo M.C., Baumgart C., Jansen C.T., Freiwald J., Hoppe M.W. (2020). Sex differences in physical capacities of German Bundesliga soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 34(8): 2329-2337. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002662.
  17. Delhez G., Robert J. (2015). The Social Responsibility of Football Clubs: The ‘Shared Value’ as a Process of Value Creation? -- Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2608973.
  18. Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J. (1996). The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30(2): 143-158. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00854-2.
  19. Fernández-Villarino R. (2021). Sustainability in the football industry: An approach to the gap between theoretical formulation and practical application, through the results of the social fair play project. Heliyon, 7(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07318.
  20. Fifka M.S., Jäger J. (2020). CSR in professional European football: An integrative framework. Soccer & Society, 21(1): 61-78. DOI: 10.1080/14660970.2018.1487840.
  21. Guest A.M. (2021) Soccer in Mind: A Thinking Fan’s Guide to the Global Game, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  22. Gneezy U., Rustichini A. (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. American Economic Review, 94(2): 377-381. DOI: 10.1257/0002828041301821.
  23. Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(3): 1049-1074. DOI: 10.1162/00335530360698496.
  24. Griffin J., Horan S., Keogh J., Dodd K., Andreatta M., Minahan C. (2021). Contextual factors influencing the characteristics of female football players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 61: 218-232 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11182-4.
  25. Hawkins R., Bishop D. (2016). An investigation into the trade-off between nature and nurture in the development of expertise for female football players: the coach’s perspective.
  26. Hovemann G., Breitbarth T., Walzel S. (2011). Beyond sponsorship? Corporate social responsibility in English, German and Swiss top national league football clubs. Journal of Sponsorship, 4(4).
  27. Katz-Bénichou G. (2004). L’éthique sportive est-elle un instrument marketing? Revue française de gestion. Dossier: Gestion du sport, 30(150): 177-192. DOI: 10.3166/rfg.150.177-192.
  28. Kerwin S., Leberman S. (2022). Exploring the complicated and complex factors of evaluating a structured gender equity programme. European Sport Management Quarterly, 1-19: 1781-1799. DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2022.2067207.
  29. Kringstad M., Gerrard B. (2007). Beyond competitive balance. In Trevor S., Parents M. (Eds.), International perspectives on the management of sport. London: Routledge, 149-172.
  30. Kringstad M. (2018). Is gender a competitive balance driver? Evidence from Scandinavian football. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1439264. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2018.1439264.
  31. Kulczycki W., Koenigstorfer J. (2016). Why sponsors should worry about corrup-tion as a mega sport event syndrome. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(5): 545-574. DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2016.1188839.
  32. Irving R. (2023). Sustainability in football: the community ownership model. (Doctoral dissertation, Birkbeck, University of London).
  33. Jaeger J. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Professional European Football (Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU).
  34. Lago I., Lago-Peñas S., Lago-Peñas C. (2022). Waiting or acting? The gender gap in international football success. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(7): 1139-1156. DOI: 10.1177/10126902211060727.
  35. Liu D., Wilson R., Plumley D., Chen X. (2019). Perceived corporate social responsibility performance in professional football and its impact on fan-based patronage intentions: An example from Chinese football. International journal of sports marketing and sponsorship, 20(2): 353-370. DOI: 10.1108/IJSMS-06-2018-0059.
  36. Manoli A.E. (2015). Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility in the Football Industry. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(3): 335-350. DOI: 10.1080/10496491.2015.1021501.
  37. Niederle M., Vesterlund L. (2008). Gender differences in competition. Negotiation Journal, 24(4): 447-463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00197.x.
  38. Niederle M., Vesterlund L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The quarterly journal of economics, 122(3): 1067-1101. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.
  39. Panton M. (2012). Football and corporate social responsibility. Working Paper. Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
  40. Pappalardo L., Rossi A., Natili M., Cintia P. (2021), Explaining the difference be-tween men’s and women’s football, PloS ONE, 16(8). DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0255407.
  41. Perroni F., Pintus A., Frandino M., Guidetti L., Baldari C. (2018). Relationship among repeated sprint ability, chronological age, and puberty in young soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 32(2): 364-371. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001799.
  42. Pfister G. (2010). Women in sport–gender relations and future perspectives. Sport in society, 13(2): 234-248. DOI: 10.1080/17430430903522954.
  43. Plaza M., Boiché J., Brunel L., Ruchaud F. (2017). Sport= male… But not all sports: Investigating the gender stereotypes of sport activities at the explicit and implicit levels. Sex roles, 76: 202-217. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0650-x.
  44. Plaza M., Boiché J. (2017). Gender stereotypes, self, and sport dropout: a one-year prospective study in adolescents. Movement & Sport Sciences, (2): 75-84. DOI: 10.3917/sm.096.0075.
  45. Reiche D. (2014). Drivers behind corporate social responsibility in the professional football sector: a case study of the German Bundesliga. Soccer & Society, 15(4): 472-502. DOI: 10.1080/14660970.2013.842877.
  46. Roşca V. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility in English Football: History and Present. Management & Marketing, 6(2).
  47. Rubio Martin G., Manuel García C.M., Rodríguez-López Á., Gonzalez Sanchez F.J. (2022). Measuring football clubs’ human capital: analytical and dynamic models based on footballers’ life cycles. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5): 1107-1137. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-06-2020-0211.
  48. Solow J.L., Kirkwood N. (2002). Group identity and gender in public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(4): 403-412. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00243-8.
  49. Suokas E. (2022). Finnish Football Teams and Corporate Social Responsibility-All to play for. theseus.fi.
  50. Steel J., Richter-Devroe S. (2003). The development of women’s football in Iran. A perspective on the future for women’s sport in the Islamic Republic. Iran, 41(1): 315-322. DOI: 10.1080/05786967.2003.11834638.
  51. Thaler R., Cass R., Sunstein C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  52. Tribou G., Augé B. (2006). Management du Sport. Marketing et gestion des clubs sportifs. Paris: Dunod.
  53. Valenti M., Scelles N., Morrow S. (2020). The determinants of stadium attendance in elite women’s football: evidence from the UEFA Women’s Champions League. Sport management review, 23(3): 509-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2019.04.005.
  54. Van Lange P.A., Manesi Z., Meershoek R.W., Yuan M., Dong M., Van Doesum N.J. (2018). Do male and female soccer players differ in helping? A study on prosocial behavior among young players. PloS one, 13(12): e0209168. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209168.
  55. Walters G., Tacon R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in European foot-ball. Working Paper. Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
  56. Walters G., Panton M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and social partnerships in professional football. In Parnell D., Richardson D. (Eds.), Football, Community and Social Inclusion (pp. 18-36). London: Routledge.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...