Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito


N. 97-Supplemento (2021): I territori fragili della pandemia: interpretazioni, luoghi, progetti, politiche

The rise of coworking spaces in peripheral and rural areas in Italy

  • Mina Akhavan
  • Ilaria Mariotti
  • Federica Rossi
18 November 2021


Coworking space is predominantly an urban phenomenon. Nevertheless, in the last few years, peripheral and rural areas are becoming attractive for this typology of new working spaces, but the literature on this topic is scant.
The current paper aims to fill this gap by reviewing the studies on this issue and discussing the renewed role of coworking spaces in peripheral and rural areas during the Covid-19 pandemic, focusing on Italy. Moreover, a detailed and updated picture of the increasing number of coworking spaces in 2018-2020 in the Italian Inner Areas and rural areas is provided. Finally, some case studies
of peripheral and rural coworking spaces are presented, followed by conclusions and further research.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Akhavan M., Mariotti I., Astolfi L., Canevari A., 2019, «Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on the Social Streets in Italy». Urban Science, 3, 2: 1-11. Doi:10.3390/urbansci3010002.
  2. Akhavan M., Mariotti I., forthcoming, «New workplaces and well-being. An empirical investigation of coworkers in Italy». Unpublished manuscript (submitted for publication).
  3. Akhavan M., 2021, «Third places for work: A comprehensive review of the literature on coworking spaces and makerspaces». In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M. (eds.), New workplaces – Location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories, 13-32. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8.
  4. Avdikos V., Merkel J., 2020, «Supporting open, shared and collaborative workspaces and hubs: recent transformations and policy implications ». Journal of Urban Research and Practice, 13, 3: 348-357. Doi: 10.1080/17535069.2019.1674501.
  5. Barca F., Casavola P., Lucatelli S., 2014, «Strategia nazionale per le Aree interne: definizione, obiettivi, strumenti e governance». In: Materiali Uval, 31, Roma: Formez PA. (access: 2018.05.17).
  6. Bentley T.A., Teo S.T.T., McLeod L., Tan F., Bosua R., Gloet M., 2015, «The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach». Applied Ergonomics, 52: 207-215. Doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019.
  7. Boschma R., 2005, «Role of Proximity in Interaction and Performance: Conceptual and Empirical Challenges». Regional Studies, 39, 1: 41-45.
  8. Boutillier S., 2018, «Le coworking, l’empreinte territoriale Essai d’analyse d’une agglomération industrielle en reconversion». Revue Interventions Économiques, 60: 10-31. Doi: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques. 4845.
  9. Boutillier S., Capdevila I., Dupont L., Morel L., 2020, «Collaborative Spaces Promoting Creativity and Innovation». Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 31, 1: 1-9. Doi: 10.3917/jie.031.0001.
  10. Capdevila I., 2013, «Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters». (2018.08.02).
  11. Capdevila I., 2017, «A typology of localized spaces of collaborative innovation ». In: van Ham M., Reuschke D, Kleinhans R, Mason C, Syrett, S. (eds.), Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods – towards an Understanding of the Economies of Neighbourhoods and Communities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Doi: 10.4337/9781785367243.00013.
  12. Capdevila I., 2021, «Spatial processes of translation: how coworking diffused from urban to rural environments. The case of Cowocat in Catalonia, Spain». In: Hracs B.J., Brydges T., Haisch T., Hauge A., Jansson J., Sjöholm J. (eds.), Culture, Creativity and Economy: Collaborative practices, value creation and spaces of creativity. London: Routledge.
  13. Carlucci C., Lucatelli S., 2013, «Aree Interne: un potenziale per la crescita economica del Paese». Agriregionieuropa, 9, 34: 17-20. COWORKMe, 2018. (2020.03.17).
  14. Di Marino M., Lapintie K., 2018, «Exploring multi-local working: chal-lenges and opportunities for contemporary cities». International Planning Studies, 25, 2: 1-21. Doi: 10.1080/13563475.2018.1528865.
  15. Evangelista V., Di Matteo D., Ferrari F., 2018, «La Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne e il turismo: appunti di riflessione». In: Cavuta G., Ferrari F. (eds.), Turismo e aree interne. Esperienze, Strategie, Visioni, Roma: Aracne, 91-110.
  16. Florida R., 2002, «The rise of the creative class». New York: Basic Books.
  17. Florida R., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2021, «Cities in a Post-COVID World». Urban Studies. In press. Doi: 10.1177/00420980211018072.
  18. Fuzi A., 2015, «Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales». Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 1: 462-469. Doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053.
  19. Gandini A., 2015, «The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review». Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15, 1: 193-205.
  20. Garrett L.E., Spreitzer G.M., Bacevice P.A., 2017, «Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces». Organization Studies, 38, 6: 821-842. Doi: 10.1177/0170840616685354.
  21. ILO, 2020, «Defining and measuring remote work, telework, work at home and home-based work». ILO policy brief. Retrieve from (2020.02.11).
  22. Institute of Entrepreneurship Development, 2017, «Start-up and management of Coworking Spaces». (access: 2021.02.04).
  23. Jakonen M., Kivinen N., Salovaara P., Hirkman P., 2017, «Towards an Economy of Encounters? A critical study of affectual assemblages in coworking». Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33, 4: 235-242.
  24. Jamal A.C., 2018, «Coworking spaces in mid-sized cities: A partner in downtown economic development». Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50, 4: 773-788. Doi: 10.1177/0308518X18760857.
  25. Katz B., Saadine M., Higgins C., 2020, «Saving small business: Supersize the local role». (access: 2020.04.22).
  26. Manzini Ceinar I., Mariotti I., 2021, «Teleworking in post-pandemic times: may local coworking spaces be the future trend?». Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 15, 1: 52-76.
  27. Manzini Ceinar I., Pacchi C., Mariotti I., 2021, «Shift in the working culture and emerging working modalities. Implications for the coworking spaces in pandemic-recovery.». Professionalità Studi, 4, 134-159.
  28. Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Di Matteo D., 2021, «The Geography of Coworking Spaces and the Effects on the Urban Context: are pole areas gaining?». In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M., (eds.), New workplaces – Location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 169-194. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8.
  29. Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Rossi F., 2021, «The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas». European Planning Studies, forthcoming. Doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080.
  30. Mariotti I. (IT), Di Marino M. (NO), Akhavan M. (IT), 2021, «The emergence of coworking models in the face of pandemic». In: Bryson J.R., Andres L., Aksle E., Reardon L., Living with Pandemics: People, Place and Policy. Edward Elgar publisher, 129-139. Doi: 10.4337/9781800373594.
  31. Mariotti I., Di Matteo D., forthcoming, «Are coworking spaces in peripheral areas performing better? A counterfactual analysis». Sustainability.
  32. Mariotti I., Di Matteo D., 2020, «Coworking in emergenza Covid-19: quali effetti per le aree periferiche?». EyesReg, 10, 2: 1-5.
  33. Mariotti I., Pacchi C., 2021, «Coworkers and coworking spaces as urban transformation actors. An Italian perspective». In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M. (eds.), New workplaces – Location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. A worldwide investigation. Cham: Springer.
  34. Mariotti I., Pacchi C., Di Vita S. 2017, «Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects». Journal of Urban Technology, 24, 3: 1-21.
  35. Micek G. Mariotti I., Di Marino M., Akhavan M., Di Vita S., Lange B., Paas T., Sinitsina A., Alfieri L., Chebotareva M., 2020, «Definition and typologies of the new working spaces». Deliverable D 1.1. Internal working paper. COST Action CA18214: The geography of new working spaces and impact on the periphery (2019-2023).
  36. Morrison R.L., Macky K.A., 2017, «The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces». Applied Ergonomics, 60: 103-115. Doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.007.
  37. Oldenburg R., 1989, «The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a
  38. Community». Da Capo Press. Pais I., Manzo C., Gerosa A., 2021, «I coworking di Milano nell’emergenza pandemica». Milano Collabora, Comune di Milano, forthcoming. (access: 2021.08.09).
  39. Petch Z., 2015, «The urban planner’s guide to coworking: a case study of Toronto, Ontario». Ryerson University Master of Planning in Urban Development.
  40. Rodríguez-Pose A., 2018, «The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)». Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 1: 189-209. Doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
  41. Sostero M., Milasi S., Hurley J., Fernandez-Marcias E., Bisello M., 2020, «Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide?».
  42. Seville: European Commission JRC and Eurofound.
  43. SouthWorking, 2020, «South-working, lavorare al sud». www.southworking. org/ (access: 2020.05.17).
  44. Spinuzzi C., 2012, «Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity». Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 4: 399-441. Doi: 10.1177/1050651912444070.
  45. Spinuzzi C., Bodrožić Z., Scaratti G., Ivaldi S., 2019, «‘Coworking Is About Community’: But What Is ‘Community’ in Coworking?». Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33, 2: 112-140. Doi: 10.1177/1050651918816357.
  46. Yu R., Burke M., Raad N., 2019, «Exploring impact of future flexible working model evolution on urban environment, economy and planning». Journal of Urban Management, 8, 3: 447-457. Doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2019.05.002.


Caricamento metriche ...