Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
FrancoAngeli Journals

Target Articles

No. 1 (2022)

Compartmentalization and unity of professional psychology. A road map for the future of the discipline

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14450
Submitted
luglio 29, 2022
Published
2022-09-13

Abstract

The compartmentalization of psychological science and of the profession prevents the progress of the discipline. Compartmentalization is a collateral effect of the impressive scientific, methodological, and technical development of psychology, which has led to the emergence of specialized segments of knowledge and practice that unavoidably tend to progress separately from each other and weaken their reciprocal linkage. The work highlights the limits of compartmentalization and discusses motives that call for the unity of psychology. Three approaches to unification are outlined: I) the identification of the ultimate causal explanation; II) the progressive extension of the explicative capacity of specific theories; III) the building of a metatheoretical framework. Finally, the paper proposes the intervention as the criterion to compare the capacity of the three approaches to unity. According to this criterion, approaches can be validated by reason of their ability to enable professional psychology to address the current challenges that people and society have to face.

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., Oleson, K. C., & Carroll, P. J. (eds.) (2013). Handbook of the uncertain self. London: Psychology Press.
  2. Baker M. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533, 452-454.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. London: Hogarth.
  5. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. III. Loss: Sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
  6. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Bowlby, R. (2004). Fifty years of attachment theory. London: Karnac.
  8. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
  9. Di Clemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: strategies for improving public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(4), 377-378. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00011-4.
  10. Di Nuovo S. (2020). Searching for Models for Psychological Science: A Possible Contribution of Simulation. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 54, 701-709. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-020-09539-y.
  11. Duschinsky, R., & White, K. (eds.) (2019). Trauma and Loss: Key Texts from the John Bowlby Archive. London: Routledge.
  12. Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 5(4), e10068.
  13. Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 8(6).
  14. Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. In J. Strachy & A.
  15. Freud (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume VII (1901-1905): A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works (pp. 123-246). London: Hogarth Press.
  16. Freud, S. (1938) Some Elementary Lessons in Psycho-Analysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 23: 279-286.
  17. Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L., & Larzelere, R. (1993). Changes in modern psychology: a citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48(6), 658.
  18. Gaj, N. (2009). Verso un modello unificato in psicologia clinica. Un’analisi storico epistemologica sullo sviluppo della disciplina. Ricerche di Psicologia, 75-94.
  19. Gilbert, P., & Bailey, K. G. (eds.) (2014). Genes on the couch: Explorations in evolutionary psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
  20. Green, C. D. (2015). Why psychology isn’t unified, and probably never will be. Review of General Psychology, 19(3): 207-214.
  21. Hagger, M. S. (2009). Theoretical integration in health psychology: unifying ideas and complementary explanations. British Journal of Health Psychology. 14(Pt 2): 189-94.
  22. Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. London: Century/Random House UK.
  23. Henriques G. (2017). Achieving a unified clinical science requires a metatheoretical solution: Comment on Melchert (2016). The American psychologist, 72(4): 393-394. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000143.
  24. Henriques, G. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.
  25. James, W. (1894). Epilogue. Psychology, briefer course, Vol. 14 (pp. 395-401). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  26. Kazdin, A. (2008). Unity: Psychology’s immunity booster. Monitor on Psychology. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/03/pc.
  27. Kimble, G. A. (1990). Mother Nature’s bag of tricks is small. Psychological Science, 1, 36-41.
  28. Koch, S. (1993). “Psychology” or the “psychological studies”. American Psychologist, 48, 902-904.
  29. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  30. Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040.
  31. Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (2011). Psychoanalysis and Motivation Systems: A New Look. New York: Routledge.
  32. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2013). Adevelopmental evolutionary framework for psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 184-189.
  33. Mandler, G. (2011). From association to organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 232-235.
  34. Marsh, T., & Boag, S. (2014). Unifying psychology: Shared ontology and the continuum of practical assumptions. Review of General Psychology, 18, 49-59.
  35. Melchert T. P. (2016). Leaving behind our preparadigmatic past: Professional psychology as a unified clinical science. The American psychologist, 71(6), 486-496. DOI: 10.1037/a0040227.
  36. Miller, G. (1985). The constitutive problem of psychology. In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 40-45). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  37. Misra, G., Pirta, R. S., Misra, I., & Chandra, N. (2021). The game of science and puzzles of paradigm. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(1), 167-180.
  38. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
  39. Norcross, J. C., & Cooper, M. (2021). Personalizing Psychotherapy. Assessing and Accomodating Patient Preferences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  40. Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  41. Prilleltensky, I. (2012). Wellness as Fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-011-9448-8.
  42. Rapaport, T. D. (1960). The Structure of Psychoanalytic Theory. New York, Int. Univ. Press.
  43. Riolo, F. (ed.) (2021). Teorie psicoanalitiche a confronto. Una indagine assiomatica [Comparing psychoanalytic theories. An axiomatic investigation]. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 68 (4), 787-1029.
  44. Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54(2), 117-128.
  45. Roeckelein, J. E. (1996a). Citation of laws and theories in textbooks across 112 years of psychology. Psychological Reports, 79, 979-998.
  46. Roeckelein, J. E. (1996b). Contributions to the history of psychology: CIV.
  47. Eminence in psychology as measured by name counts and eponyms. Psychological Reports, 78(1), 243-253.
  48. Roeckelein, J. E. (1997). Psychology among the sciences: Comparisons of numbers of theories and laws cited in textbooks. Psychological Reports, 80, 131-141.
  49. Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theorydriven science. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
  50. Salvatore, S. (2017). The formalization of cultural psychology. Reasons and functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 1-13. DOI 10.1007/s12124-016-9366-2.
  51. Shepard, R. N. (2004). How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 1-23. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206455.
  52. Siegel, D. J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Publications.
  53. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  54. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 59-67.
  55. Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychology as a science within Comte’s hypothesized hierarchy: Empirical investigations and conceptual implications. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 334-344.
  56. Spear, J. H. (2007). Prominent schools or other active specialties? A fresh look at some trends in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 363-380.
  57. Stam, H. J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1259-1262.
  58. Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and Experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London: Palgrave.
  59. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Unifying the field of psychology. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream? (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  60. Tatman, A. W., & Gilgen, A. R. (1999). Authorities and research emphasized in the Annual Review of Psychology, 1975-1998. Psychological reports, 85(1), 89-100.
  61. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2015). The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 3-87). Hoboken (NJ) USA: Wiley & Son.
  62. Toomela, A., &. J. Valsiner (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  63. Toomela, A. (2020). Psychology today: Still in denial, still outdated. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 563-571.
  64. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). Tracking trends in psychological science. In T. C. Dalton & R. B Evans (eds.), The life cycle of psychological ideas (pp. 105-130). Boston: Springer.
  65. Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating Psychology within the Globalizing World: A Requiem to the Post-Modernist Experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1-21.
  66. Valsiner, J., & Salvatore, S. (2012). How Idiographic Science could create its terminology? In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner & A. Gennaro (eds.). Making Sense of Infinite Uniqueness: The emerging system of Idiographic Science Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 4 (pp 3-20). Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
  67. Vygotskij, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published in 1934).
  68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1927/1997). The historical meaning of the crisis of psychology. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 233-344). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  69. Wagemans, J. (2018). Perceptual organization. In J. T. Wixed (ed.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (Vol. 2. Sensation, Perception, & Attention, pp. 803-872). Hoboken (NJ) USA: Wiley & Son.
  70. Zagaria, A., Ando’, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 521-562.
  71. Zagaria, A., Ando’, A., & Zennaro, A. (2021). Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(2), 225-249.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...