Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Articoli. Lo spazio del cibo: narrazioni, politiche e territori

N. 4 (2023)

Oltre la carne? Insostenibilità alimentari, (possibili) transizioni proteiche e paesaggi del futuro

  • Elena dell'Agnese
  • Marcella Schmidt di Friedberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/rgioa4-2023oa16849
Inviata
23 novembre 2023
Pubblicato
20-12-2023

Abstract

Anche se i sistemi alimentari sono responsabili di un terzo delle emissioni globali di gas serra antropogenici, nelle politiche per la transizione ecologica l’alimentazione viene spesso relegata in una posizione marginale. Anche quando se ne parla, il tema principale sembra essere quello relativo alla riduzione delle emissioni di gas serra, in relazione ai consumi energetici, mentre ha un peso ‘climatico’ decisamente elevato anche ciò che si mangia, e in particolare l’alimentazione a base di carne. Il paper si propone di indagare come la cultura alimentare si articoli in relazione al cambiamento climatico, domandandosi in particolare se i sostituti della carne e l’introduzione di alimenti ‘nuovi’ (insetti, alghe) debbano diventare ‘normali’ per ridurre l’impatto climatico delle abitudini alimentari convenzionali. Le conseguenze economiche e occupazionali, oltre che paesistiche, di questa transizione proteica e, quindi, dell’abbandono dell’allevamento e del mutamento delle colture rimangono ancora tutte da investigare.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Araújo R., Peteiro C. (2021). Algae as food and food supplements in Europe, Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), Publications Office of the European Union: 1-34. DOI: 10.2760/049515, JRC125913
  2. de Boer J., Schösler H., Boersema J.J. (2013). Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33: 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001
  3. Bajželj B., Richards K.S., Allwood J.M., Smith P., Dennis J.S., Curmi E., Gilligan C.A. (2014). Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4: 924-929. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2353
  4. Beauchemin K.A., Ungerfeld E.M., Abdalla A.L., Alvarez C., Arndt C., Becquet P., Benchaar C., Berndt A., Mauricio R.M., McAllister T.A., Walter Oyhantçabal, Saheed A. Salami, Shalloo L., Sun Y., Tricarico J., Uwizeye A., De Camillis C., Bernoux M., Robinson T., Kebreab E. (2022). Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Dairy Science, 105: 9297-9326. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22091
  5. Bertero A., Biressi S., Buscemi F., Conti L., Cresti M., Gargioli C., Lo Sapio L., Loera
  6. B.L., Poncibò C., Stano S. (2023). Serve un dibattito informato sulla carne coltivata, Nature Italy, www.nature.com/articles/d43978-023-00057-0#ref-CR8.
  7. Bessa L.W., Pieterse E., Sigge G., Hoffman L.C. (2020). Insects as human food: from farm to fork. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100: 5017-5022. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8860
  8. Biscotti B., Dall’ò E., Dameno R. (2020). Antropocene e cibo del futuro: uno sguardo agli insetti tra storia, immaginari, normative e sostenibilità, Dada Rivista di Antropologia post-globale, 1, Antropologia del cibo, www.dadarivista.com/DadaRivista-Download-Speciale-n1-2020.html.
  9. Bridle S. (2020). Food and Climate Change Without the Hot Air. Cambridge: UIT Cambridge Ltd.
  10. Bryngelsson D., Wirsenius S., Hedenus F., Sonesson U. (2016). How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture. Food Policy, 59: 152-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.012
  11. Buscemi F.R. (2015). New meat and the media conundrum with nature and culture. Lexia, 19-20: 419-434. DOI: 10.4399/978885488571426
  12. Crippa M., Solazzo E., Guizzardi D., Monforti-Ferrario F., Tubiello F.N., Leip A.J.N.F. (2021). Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions Nature Food, 2: 198-209. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9
  13. Essere Animali (s.d.). 2010-2019 Dieci anni di zootecnia in Italia, www.essereanimali.org/dieci-anni-di-zootecnia-in-italia.
  14. Frankowska A., Schmidt Rivera X., Bridle S.L., Kluczkovski A., da Silva J., Martins C., Rauber F., Levy R.B., Cook J., Reynolds C. (2020). How home cooking methods and appliances affect the GHG emissions of food. Nature Food, 1: 787-791. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-020-00200-w
  15. Gaillac R., Marbach S. (2021). The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: A practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321: 128766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128766
  16. Gianquintieri L., Oxoli D., Caiani E.G., Brovelli M.A. (2023). Land use influence on ambient PM2. 5 and ammonia concentrations: Correlation analyses in the Lombardy region, Italy. Proceedings of the 26th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, 4: 1-7. DOI: 10.5194/agile-giss-4-26-2023
  17. Gregory J. (2007). Of Victorians and vegetarians: The Vegetarian movement in nineteenthcentury Britain. Londra: Tauris Academic Studies.
  18. Jallinoja P., Vinnari M., Niva M. (2018). Veganism and plant-based eating: Analysis of interplay between discursive strategies and lifestyle political consumerism. In: Boström M., Micheletti M., Oosterveer P., a cura di, The Oxford Handbook of Political Consumerism. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
  19. Harris M. (1985). Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Long Grove: Waveland Press
  20. (trad. it.: Buono da mangiare. Enigmi del gusto e consuetudini alimentari. Torino: Einaudi, 1990).
  21. van Huis A., Van Itterbeeck J., Klunder H., Mertens E., Halloran A., Muir G., Vantomme P. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security (171). Roma: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
  22. IPCC (2019). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, www.ipcc.ch › srccl.
  23. Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA) (2022). Tendenze e Dinamiche Recenti Bovino da carne, 1, Roma.
  24. Kerslake E., Kemper J.A., Conroy D. (2022). What’s your beef with meat substitutes? Exploring barriers and facilitators for meat substitutes in omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans. Appetite, 1: 170:105864. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105864
  25. Kluczkovski A., Cook J., Downie H.F., Fletcher A., McLoughlin L., Markwick A., Bridle S.L., Reynolds C.J., Schmidt Rivera X., Martindale W., Frankowska A., Moraes M.M., Birkett A.J., Summerton S., Green R., Fennell J.T., Smith P., Ingram J., Langley I., Yates L., Ajagun-Brauns J. (2020). Interacting with Members of the Public to Discuss the Impact of Food Choices on Climate Change – Experiences from Two UK Public Engagement Events. Sustainability, 12: 2323. DOI:10.3390/su12062323
  26. Kortetmäki T., Oksanen M. (2021). Is there a convincing case for climate veganism?. Agriculture and Human Values, 38: 729-40.
  27. Lévi-Strauss C. (1965). Le triangle culinaire. L’Arc, 26: 19-29.
  28. Michel F., Hartmann C., Siegrist M. (2021). Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 87: 104063.
  29. Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza (PNRR) (2021). www.governo.it › governo.it › files› PNRR
  30. Rödl M.B. (2019). What’s New?: A History of Meat Alternatives in the UK. In: Bogueva D., Marinova D., Raphaely T., Schmidinger K., a cura di, Environmental, health, and business opportunities in the new meat alternatives market. Hershey: IGI Global.
  31. Roque B.M., Venegas M., Kinley R.D., de Nys R., Duarte T.L., Yang X. et al. (2021). Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers. PLoS ONE, 16(3): e0247820. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247820
  32. Santo R.E., Kim B.F., Goldman S.E., Dutkiewicz J., Biehl E.M.B., Bloem M.W., Neff R.A., Nachman K.E. (2020). Considering Plant-Based Meat Substitutes and Cell-Based Meats: A Public Health and Food Systems Perspective. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4: 134. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00134
  33. Scarborough P., Appleby P.N., Mizdrak A. et al. (2014). Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Climatic Change, 125: 179-192. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1
  34. Servizio Studi Senato della Repubblica (2023). Disposizioni in materia di divieto di produzione e di immissione sul mercato di alimenti e mangimi sintetici, A.S. n. 651, Dossier 95.
  35. Siniscalchi S. (2022). Gli allevamenti intensivi in Italia tra food safety e sostenibilità. Un’analisi geografica. In: Memorie geografiche. Geografia e cibo: ricerche, riflessioni e discipline a confronto. Firenze: Società di Studi Geografici, 449-458.
  36. Sinke P., Swartz E., Sanctorum H., van der Giesen C., Odegard I. (2023). Ex‑ante life cycle assessment of commercial‑scale cultivated meat production in 2030, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 28: 234-254. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-022-02128-8
  37. Slade J., Alleyne E. (2023). The psychological impact of slaughterhouse employment: A systematic literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24: 429-440. DOI: 10.1177/15248380211030243
  38. Slade P. (2018). If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite, 125: 428-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030
  39. Springmann M., Clark M., Mason-D’Croz D. et al. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562: 519-525. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
  40. Tan H.S.G., Fischer A.R., Tinchan P., Stieger M., Steenbekkers L.P.A., van Trijp H.C. (2015). Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food quality and preference, 42: 78-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013
  41. Toti E., Massaro L., Kais A., Aiello P., Palmery M., Peluso I. (2020). Entomophagy: A narrative review on nutritional value, safety, cultural acceptance and a focus on the role of food neophobia in Italy. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10: 628-643. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe10020046
  42. Tzachor A., Richards C.E., Holt L. (2021). Future foods for risk-resilient diets. Nature Food, 2: 326-329. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00269-x
  43. Weber C.L., Matthews H.S. (2008). Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 3508-3513. DOI: 10.1021/es702969f
  44. Weik von Mossner A. (2021). Feeling bad? Veganism, climate change, and the rhetoric of cowspiracy. In: Hanganu-Bresch C., Kondrlik K., a cura di, Veg (etari) an Arguments in Culture, History, and Practice: The V Word. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series.
  45. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe (2021). Plant-based diets and their impact on health, sustainability and the environment: a review of the evidence. WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/349086
  46. Xu X., Sharma P., Shu S., Lin T.S., Ciais P., Tubiello F.N., Smith P., Campbell N., Jain A.K. (2021). Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nature Food, 2: 724-732. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...