Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
FrancoAngeli Journals

Saggi

N. 128 (2023)

Innovazione dei processi in sanità. L’impatto dei Set procedurali personalizzati per aumentare l’efficienza di sala operatoria

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/mesa2023-128oa18594
Inviata
ottobre 2, 2024
Pubblicato
2024-11-28

Abstract

Il presente articolo ha l’obiettivo di studiare l’introduzione di Set standardizzati di strumenti chirurgici monouso sull’efficienza di sala operatoria. L’attività di osservazione è stata effettuata presso tre Istituti ospedalieri per diverse specializzazioni chirurgiche, e i dati raccolti sono stati organizzati grazie alla mappatura delle attività delle procedure chirurgiche.
I dati, analizzati tramite un t-test parametrico sulla differenza tra tempi medi di svolgimento degli interventi con e senza il Set, hanno determinato che questa innovazione incrementa l’efficienza degli strumentisti nella preparazione della sala e nello svolgimento delle proprie mansioni. Inoltre, si evidenzia la possibilità di ridurre significativamente il tempo di svolgimento complessivo delle procedure, se gli Istituti implementano il Set come parte integrante del proprio metodo di lavoro e ne comprendono le potenzialità.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Amatucci F., Brusoni M. (2024). Acquistare innovazione in sanità: condividere responsabilità e ruoli. Il caso degli acquisti dei servizi di diagnostica tumorale attraverso il Value-Based Procurement (VBP). Mecosan, 126.
  2. Apelgren K. N., Blank M. L., Slomski C. A., and Hadjis N. S. (1994). Reusable instruments are more cost effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 8(1): 32-34.
  3. Bender J. S., Nicolescu O., Hollingsworth S. B., Murer K., Wallace K. R., and Ertl W. J. (2015). Improving operating room efficiency via an interprofessional approach. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(3): 447-450.
  4. Cendan J. C. (2006). Interdisciplinary work flow assessment and redesign decreases operating room turnover time and allows for additional caseload. Archives of Surgery, 141(1): 65.
  5. Chin C. J., Sowerby L. J., John-Baptiste A., and Rotenberg B. W. (2014). Reducing otolaryngology surgical inefficiency via assessment of tray redundancy. Journal of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 43(1).
  6. Cichos K. H., Linsky P. L., Wei B., Minnich D. J., and Cerfolio R. J. (2017). Cost savings of standardization of thoracic surgical instruments: The process of lean. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 104(6): 1889-1895.
  7. Cima R. R., Brown M. J., Hebl J. R., Moore R., Rogers J. C., Kollengode A., Amstutz G. J., Weisbrod C. A., Narr B. J., and Deschamps C. (2011). Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 213(1): 83-92.
  8. Cusumano N. et al. (2020). Evoluzioni e impatti della centralizzazione degli acquisti nel SSN: proposte per il miglioramento dei sistemi regionali. In Cergas Bocconi (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2020. Milano: Egea.
  9. DelliFraine J. L., Langabeer J. R., and Nembhard I. M. (2010). Assessing the evidence of six sigma and lean in the health care industry. Quality Management in Health Care, 19(3): 211-225.
  10. Demoulin L., Kesteloot K., and Penninckx F. (1996). A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 10(5): 520-525.
  11. Dollevoet T., van Essen J. T., and Glorie K. M. (2018). Solution methods for the tray optimization problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 271(3): 1070-1084.
  12. Drummond M. F., Schwartz J. S., Jhonsson B., Luce B. R., Neumann P. J., Siebert U., and Sullivan S. D. (2008). Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(03): 244-258.
  13. Dyas A. R., Lovell K. M., Balentine C. J., Wang T. N., Porterfield J. R., Chen H., and Lindeman B. M. (2018). Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing. Journal of Surgical Research, 229: 15-19.
  14. Eddie G. and White S. (1996). A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 66(10): 671-675.
  15. Egan P., Pierce A., Flynn A., Teeling S. P., Ward M., and McNamara M. (2021). Releasing operating room nursing time to care through the reduction of surgical case preparation time: A lean six sigma pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 12098.
  16. Farrelly J. S., Clemons C., Witkins S., Hall W., Christison-Lagay E. R., Ozgediz D. E., Cowles R. A., Stitelman D. H., and Caty M. G. (2017). Surgical tray optimization as a simple means to decrease perioperative costs. Journal of Surgical Research, 220: 320-326.
  17. Farrokhi F. R., Gunther M., Williams B., and Blackmore C. C. (2015). Application of lean methodology for improved quality and efficiency in operating room instrument availability. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 37(5): 277-286.
  18. Gray M. (2017). Value based healthcare. BMJ, 356.
  19. Gupta A., Mercieca K., Fahad B., and Biswas S. (2009). The effectiveness and safety of single-use disposable instruments in cataract surgery – a clinical study using a surgeon-based survey. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 19(4): 148-151.
  20. Krasner H., Connelly N. R., Flack J., and Weintraub A. (1999). A multidisciplinary process to improve the efficiency of cardiac operating rooms. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 13(6): 661-665.
  21. Lee D. J., Ding J., and Guzzo T. J. (2019). Improving operating room efficiency. Current Urology Reports, 20(6).
  22. Leiden A., Cerdas F., Noriega D., Beyerlein J., & Herrmann C. (2020). Life cycle assessment of a disposable and a reusable surgery instrument set for spinal fusion surgeries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104704.
  23. Lunardini D., Arington R., Canacari E. G., Gamboa K., Wagner K., and McGuire K. J. (2014). Lean principles to optimize instrument utilization for spine surgery in an academic medical center. Spine, 39(20): 1714-1717.
  24. Manatakis D. K. and Georgopoulos N. (2014). Reducing the cost of laparoscopy: Reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments. Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1-4.
  25. Marsilio M., Pisarra M., Rubio K., and Shortell S. (2022). Lean adoption, implementation, and outcomes in public hospitals: benchmarking the US and Italy health systems. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1).
  26. Mont M. A., McElroy M. J., Johnson A. J., and Pivec R. (2013). Single-use instruments, cutting blocks, and trials increase efficiency in the operating room during total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 28(7): 1135-1140.
  27. Negash S., Anberber E., Ayele B., Ashebir Z., Abate A., Bitew S., Derbew M., Weiser T. G., Starr N., and Mammo T. N. (2022). Operating room efficiency in a low resource setting: a pilot study from a large tertiary referral center in Ethiopia. Patient Safety in Surgery, 16(1).
  28. Ottardi C., Damonti A., Porazzi E., Foglia E., Ferrario L., Villa T., Aimar E., Brayda-Bruno M., and Galbusera F. (2017). A comparative analysis of a disposable and a reusable pedicle screw instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis: integrating HTA and MCDA. Health Economics Review, 7(1).
  29. Reeve J., Baladi J., and Menon D. (1994, Montréal, October 6-7). Reuse of disposable medical devices. In Fourth CCOHTA Regional Symposium.
  30. Siu J., Hill A. G., and MacCormick A. D. (2016). Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 87(1-2): 28-33.
  31. Stockert E. W. and Langerman A. (2014). Assessing the magnitude and costs of intraoperative inefficiencies attributable to surgical instrument trays. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 219(4): 646-655.
  32. Teeling S. P., Dewing J., and Baldie D. (2020). A discussion of the synergy and divergence between lean six sigma and person-centred improvement sciences. International Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(1): 10-23.
  33. Toor J., Bhangu A., Wolfstadt J., Bassi G., Chung S., Rampersaud R., Mitchell W., Milner J., and Koyle M. (2022). Optimizing the surgical instrument tray to immediately increase efficiency and lower costs in the operating room. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 65(2): E275-E281.
  34. Toor J., Du J. T., Koyle M., Abbas A., Shah A., Bassi G., Morra D., and Wolfstadt J. (2022). Inventory optimization in the perioperative care department using Kotter’s change model. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 48(1): 5-11.
  35. Vecchi V., Cusumano N., Callea G., Amatucci F., Brusoni M., Zurlo F., Mauro C., Longo F. (2023). Acquisti sanitari: stato dell’arte e percorsi evolutivi verso logiche di valore. In Cergas Bocconi (a cura di). Rapporto OASI 2023. Milano: Egea.
  36. Voigt J., Seigerman D., Lutsky K., Beredjiklian P., and Leinberry C. (2021). Comparison of the costs of reusable versus disposable equipment for endoscopic carpal tunnel release procedures using activity-based costing analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 46(4): 339.e1-339.e15.
  37. Winter D. C. (2009). The cost of laparoscopic surgery is the price of progress. British Journal of Surgery, 96(4): 327-328.
  38. Womack J. P. and Jones D. T. (1997). Lean thinking — banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(11): 1148-1148.
  39. Yung E., Gagner M., Pomp A., Dakin G., Milone L., and Strain G. (2008). Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery, 20(4): 512-518.

Metriche

Caricamento metriche ...