Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Materiali per la ricerca e l'approfondimento

No. 124 (2022)

Clinical governance: The case of the AORN Cardarelli Hospital in Naples

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/mesa2022-124oa16276
Submitted
luglio 26, 2023
Published
2023-11-16

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of clinical governance at the Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale (AORN) Antonio Cardarelli in Naples, Italy. As the preeminent healthcare institution in the Campania region, boasting a significant bed capacity, AORN Cardarelli faces the formidable challenge of upholding quality and safety standards within a complex and dynamic healthcare landscape. To achieve these objectives, the hospital fosters collaborative endeavors among healthcare professionals, encompassing physicians, nurses, and other essential personnel, to realize the goals of clinical governance. This entails involving healthcare providers in pivotal decision-making processes, ranging from investment strategies to the formulation of the institutional charter, as well as organizational changes and professional development initiatives. The hospital has established various internal departments that assume responsibility for distinct facets of clinical governance, including Diagnostic-Therapeutic Care Pathways (PDTA), systems for monitoring clinical outcomes, risk management teams, training programs, health technology assessment (HTA), performance evaluation mechanisms, and research endeavors. Despite the inherent challenges encountered by public institutions, AORN Cardarelli has proactively introduced innovative proposals to surmount these obstacles, such as operator training programs, a dedicated unit specializing in communication and innovation, and tailored care pathways designed specifically for women’s health. This article elucidates the experiences gained and outlines future trajectories for clinical governance at AORN Cardarelli, underscoring its commitment to advancing healthcare delivery and enhancing patient outcomes.

References

  1. Barnes T., Yu T.C.W., & Webster C.S. (2020). Preparedness of medical students and junior doctors for their role as clinical leaders: a systematic review. Medical Teacher, 42(1): 79-85.
  2. Cuccurullo C., Ferre F., & Lega F. (2010). I piani di rientro della spesa sanitaria: un’analisi comparativa. In: L’aziendalizzazione della Sanità in Italia. Rapporto OASI 2010, 225-260. Milano: Egea.
  3. Degeling P.J., Maxwell S., Iedema R., & Hunter D.J. (2004). Making clinical governance work. Bmj, 329(7467): 679-681.
  4. Ferrè F., Cuccurullo C., & Lega F. (2012). The challenge and the future of health care turnaround plans: evidence from the Italian experience. Health Policy, 106(1): 3-9.
  5. Gauld R., Horsburgh S., & Brown J. (2011). The clinical governance development index: results from a New Zealand study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(11): 947-952.
  6. Mauro M., Maresso A., & Guglielmo A. (2017). Health decentralization at a dead-end: towards new recovery plans for Italian hospitals. Health Policy, 121(6): 582-587.
  7. McSherry R., & Pearce P. (2011). Clinical governance: a guide to implementation for healthcare professionals. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Nicholls S., Cullen R., O’Neill S., & Halligan A. (2000). Clinical governance: its origins and its foundations. British Journal of Clinical Governance, 5(3): 172-178.
  9. Onion C.W. (2000). Principles to govern clinical governance. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6(4): 405-412.
  10. Onion C.W.R., Dutton C.E., Walley T., Turnbull C.J., Dunne W.T., & Buchan I.E. (1996). Local clinical guidelines: description and evaluation of a participative method for their development and implementation. Family Practice, 13(1): 28-34.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...