Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articoli

No. 59 (2024)

Psychological Types between tradition, controversies and modernity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3280/jun59-2024oa18132
Submitted
luglio 12, 2024
Published
2024-07-22

Abstract

From the edition of Psychological Types (1921) onward, literature and epistolary correspondence helped clarify how typology was anything but Carl Gustav Jung’s main interest. The latter recognized its value as a critical apparatus for sifting empirical material, rather than an attempt to typify consciousnesses. It is precisely the heuristic capacity of types, which justifies their use today in psychotherapeutic and analytical settings. Paradoxically, it is instead their systematization as “characterology” that decreed their success even outside clinical contexts and, from the 1920s onward, their enormous diffusion at every latitude, making the theory gradually more and more relevant for evaluative, training, and orientational purposes. From 1942 to the present, numerous psychometric attempts inspired by Jungian typology are made, derived, congruent, or divergent from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). While the theory is becoming increasingly sophisticated methodologically, it nevertheless seems to overshadow almost all of the philosophical, literary, and cultural concerns dear to Jung, as noted by James Hillman in a talk given at Eranos in 1976, Egalitarian Typologies versus the Perception of the Unique.

References

  1. Beebe J. (1992). Psychological Types in Transference, Countertransference and the Therapeu-tic interaction. In: Papadopoulos R.K., ed., Carl Gustav Jung, Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge.
  2. Beebe J. (2004). Understanding Consciousness through the Theory of Psychological Types. In: Cambray J., Carter L., eds., Analytical Psychology: Contemporary Perspectives in Jungian Analysis. London and New York: Brunner-Routledge (trad. it.: Comprendere la coscienza attraverso la teoria dei tipi psicologici. In: Cambray J., Carter L., a cura di, Psicologia Analitica. Prospettive contemporanee di analisi junghiana. Roma: Giovanni Fioriti, 2010).
  3. Beebe J. (2005). Evolving the eight-function model. Association for Psychological Type International Bulletin, 28, 4: 34-39.
  4. Beebe J. (2006). Psychological types. An historical overview. In: Papadopoulos R.K., ed., The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice, and Applications. London and New York: Routledge.
  5. Beebe J. (2007a). Type and archetype. Part I: The spine and its shadow. Typeface. A publication of the British Association for Psychological Type, 18, 2: 7-11.
  6. Beebe J. (2007b). Type and archetype. Part II: The arms and their shadow. Typeface. A publication of the British Association for Psychological Type, 18, 3: 22-27.
  7. Beebe J., Falzeder E., eds. (2015). The Question of Psychological Types. The Correspondence of C.G. Jung and Hans Schmid-Guisan, 1915-1916. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  8. Bernardini R., Gasseau M., a cura di (2009). Il sogno: prospettive di Eranos. In: Il sogno. Dalla psicologia analitica allo psicodramma junghiano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Bernardini R. (2022). Jung a Eranos. Il progetto della psicologia complessa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Bernardini R., Merlini F., a cura di (2020). Rebirth. Text and Notes of the Lecture held at Eranos in 1939/Rinascere. Testo e appunti della conferenza tenuta a Eranos nel 1939. Ascona: Aragno* Eranos Ascona.
  11. Buber M. (1923). Ich und Du. Leipzig: Insel (trad. it.: L’io e il Tu. Pavia: IRSEF, 1991).
  12. Durand G. (1963). Les structures anthropologiques de l’Imaginaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (trad. it.: Le strutture antropologiche dell’immaginario. Introduzione all’archetipologia generale. Bari: Dedalo, 1972).
  13. Ellenberger H.F. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: La scoperta dell’inconscio. Storia della psichiatria dinamica, vol. 2. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1976).
  14. Ekstrom S. (1988). Jung’s typology and DSM-III personality disorders: A comparison of two systems of classification. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 33, 4: 329-44.
  15. Grant R.D. (1990). The I Ching: Images of Psychological Typology and Development. Gladwyne, PA: Type & Temperament, Incorporate.
  16. Hillman J. (1972). The Myth of Analysis. Three Essays in Archetypal Psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press (trad. it.: Il mito dell’analisi. Milano: Adelphi, 1979).
  17. Hillman J. (1975). Re-visioning Psychology. London: Harper and Row (trad. it.: Revisione della psicologia. Milano: Adelphi, 1992).
  18. Hillman J. (1976). Egalitarian Typologies versus the Perception of the Unique. In: Portmann A., Ritsema R., Brill E.J., eds., Oneness and Variety/Einheit und Verschiedenheit/L’un et le divers – Lectures given at the Eranos Conference in Ascona from August 18th to 26th, 1976/Vorträge gehalten auf der Eranos Tagung in Ascona vom 18. bis 26. August 1976/Conférences données à la session d’Eranos à Ascona du 18 au 26 Août 1976. Eranos-Yearbook/Jahrbuch / Annales, vol. 45: 221-279.
  19. Hillman J. (1979). The Dream and the Underworld. New York: Harper & Row (trad. it.: Il sogno e il mondo infero. Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1988).
  20. Hunziker M. (2017). Depth Typology: C.G. Jung, Isabel Myers, John Beebe and The Guide Map to Becoming Who We Are. Clayton, N.C.: Write Way Publishing Company.
  21. Jaffé A., Jung C.G. (1961). Erinnerungen, Träume, Gedanken von C.G. Jung. Zürich: Rascher (trad. it.: Ricordi, sogni, riflessioni di C.G. Jung. Milano: BUR, 1992).
  22. Jarrett J. (1992). Jung’s Theory of Functions: Some Questions. In: Papadopoulos R.K., ed., Carl Gustav Jung. Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge.
  23. Jung C.G. (1904/1905). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Assoziationen Gesunder (trad. it.: L’associazione verbale negli individui normali. In: Opere, vol. 2. Torino: Boringhieri, 1984).
  24. Jung C.G. (1912). Neue Bahnen der Psychologie (trad. it.: Vie nuove della psicologia. In: Opere, vol. 7. Torino: Boringhieri, 1983).
  25. Jung C.G. (1913). Zur Frage der Psychologischen Typen (trad. it.: Sulla questione dei tipi psicologici. In: Opere, vol. 6. Torino: Boringhieri, 1969).
  26. Jung C.G. (1917/1943). Über die Psychologie des Unbewussten (trad. it.: Psicologia dell’inconscio. In: Opere, vol. 7. Torino: Boringhieri, 1983).
  27. Jung C.G. (1921/1925). Psychologische Typen (trad. it.: Tipi Psicologici. In: Opere, vol. 6. Torino: Boringhieri, 1969).
  28. Jung C.G. (1928). Analytische Psychologie und Erziehung (trad. it.: Psicologia analitica ed educazione. In: Opere, vol. 17. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1991).
  29. Jung C.G. (1928/1936). Psychologische Typologie (trad. it.: Tipologia psicologica. In: Opere, vol. 6. Torino: Boringhieri, 1969).
  30. Jung C.G. (1942/1948). Versuch einer psychologischen Deutung des Trinitätsdogmas (trad. it.: Saggio d’interpretazione psicologica del dogma della Trinità. In: Opere, vol. 10. Tori-no: Bollati Boringhieri, 2013).
  31. Jung C.G. (1944). Psychologie und Alchemie (trad. it.: Psicologia e alchimia. In: Opere, vol. 12. Torino: Boringhieri, 1981).
  32. Jung C.G. (1947/1954). Theoretische Überlegungen zum Wesen des Psychischen (trad. it.: Riflessioni teoriche sull’essenza della psiche. In: Opere, vol. 8. Torino: Bollati Boringhie-ri, 1994).
  33. Jung C.G. (1955). Mysterium Coniunctionis. Untersuchungen über die Trennung und Zusammensetzung der seelischen Gegensätze in der Alchemie (trad. it.: Mysterium coniunctionis. Ricerche sulla separazione e composizione degli opposti psichici nell’alchimia. In: Opere, vol. 14. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1989).
  34. Jung C.G. (1957/58). Die transzendente Funktion (trad. it.: La funzione trascendente. In: Opere, vol. 8. Torino: Boringhieri, 1976).
  35. Kendall E. (1992). The Four Functions. A Conceptual Analysis. In: Papadopoulos R.K., ed., Carl Gustav Jung. Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge.
  36. McCaulley M.H. (1981). Jung’s Theory of Psychological Types and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In: McReynolds P., ed., Advances in Psychological Assessments. San Francis-co, CA: Jossey Bass.
  37. McGuire W., Hull R.F.C., eds (1977). C.G. Jung. Speaking. Interviews and Encounters. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (trad. it.: Jung parla. Interviste e incontri. Milano: Adelphi, 1995).
  38. Meier C.A. (1977). Persönlichkeit: der Individuationsprozess im Lichte der Typologie C.G. Jungs. Walter: Olten/Freiburg im Breisgau.
  39. Meroni B. (2002). Tipologia e psiche. Per un impiego più efficace della tipologia junghiana. Bergamo: Moretti & Vitali.
  40. Myers I.B. (1962). Manual. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service (trad. it.: Manuale. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali, 1991).
  41. Myers I.B., Kirby L.K., Myers K.D. (1962/1998). Introduction to Type. A Description of the Theory and Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  42. Myers I.B. (1980/1995). Gifts Differing. Understanding Personality Type. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  43. Myers I.B., McCaulley M.H. (1985). Manual. A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  44. Myers I.B., Kirby L.K. (1994). Introduction to Type Dynamics and Development. Exploring the Next Level of Type. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  45. Myers I.B., McCaulley M.H., Quenk N.L., Hammer A.L. (1998). MBTI Manual. A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  46. Myers I.B., McCaulley M.H., Quenk N.L., Hammer A.L. (2018). MBTI Manual for the Global Step I and Step II Assessments. A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment (IV ed.). Sunnyvale, CA: The Myers-Briggs Company.
  47. Myers S. (2016). The five functions of psychological type. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 61, 2: 183-202. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12205.
  48. Pieri P.F. (1998). Dizionario junghiano. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  49. Quenk N., Hammer A.L., Majors M.S. (2001). MBTI Step II Manual: Exploring the Next Level of Type with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Form Q. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  50. Samuels A., Shorter B., Plaut F. (1986). A Critical Dictionary of Jungian Analysis. London: Routledge (trad. it.: Dizionario di Psicologia Analitica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1987).
  51. Samuels A. (1992). Developments in typology. In R. Papadopoulos, ed., Carl Gustav Jung. Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge.
  52. Saggino A. (1993). MBTI. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Dati normative e contributo alla standardizzazione italiana della Forma F. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
  53. Saggino A., Kline P. (1995). Item factor analysis of the Italian version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality and Individual Differences, 19: 243-49.
  54. Saunders D.R. (1991). Katharine and Isabel: Mother’s light, daughter’s journey. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  55. Schaubhut N.A., Herk N.A., Thompson R.C. (2009). MBTI Form M. Manual Supplement. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  56. Schaubhut N.A., Thompson R.C. (2011). MBTI Step II – Manual Supplement. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
  57. Shamdasani S. (2003). Jung and the Making of Modern Psychology. The Dream of a Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (trad. it.: Jung e la creazione della psicologia moderna. Il sogno di una scienza. Roma: Ma.Gi. Edizioni, 2007).
  58. Thompson H.L. (1996). Jung’s Functions-Attitudes Explained. Watkinsville, GA: Wormhole.
  59. Toynbee A. (1956). An Historian’s Approach to Religion. London: Oxford University Press.
  60. Trapanese E.V. (1992). Tipi psicologici e funzioni della psiche. In: Carotenuto A., a cura di, Trattato di Psicologia Analitica, vol. 2. Torino: UTET.
  61. von Franz M.L., Hillman J. (1971). Lectures on Jung’s Typology: The Inferior Function. New York: Spring Publications (trad. it.: Tipologia psicologica. Le funzioni della coscienza: pensiero e sentimento, intuizione e sensazione. Como: Red, 2004).
  62. Zoccoli Francesini I.R. (1987). Il mutamento. Considerazioni sul processo di individuazione. Klaros. Quaderni di Psicologia Analitica, 2, 2.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...