TrasformAzioni con il metodo  di Cittadinanza Riflessiva Koinonia

Marina Mojović

doi:10.3280/gruoa2-2024oa22917

Tema

N. 2 (2024): Comunità nella clinica e nella contemporaneità

TrasformAzioni con il metodo di Cittadinanza Riflessiva Koinonia

Marina Mojović

SCARICA QUI IL PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/gruoa2-2024oa22917
Inviata: maggio 27, 2026
Pubblicato: 2026-06-17

Abstract

Le Trasform-Azioni con il Metodo della Cittadinanza Riflessiva (CR), aperta a chiunque e ovunque senza alcun costo, sono processi psicosociali di creatività collettiva con e tra persone che cercano di imparare ad ascoltare l’altro, di trovare voce, di trasformare l’odio in dialogo e in iniziative umanitarie nei campi della Cittadinanza Riflessiva (CR) – Reflective Citizens “Koinonia”. Nei suoi tre lunghi decenni di sviluppo (dalla Serbia, Bosnia, e Slovenia, fino alla Polonia, all’Italia, alla Grecia, agli Stati Uniti, all’Irlanda, al Regno Unito, ai rami internazionali, online, ibride ecc.) la CR scopre spesso comunità affini che si occupano di interdisciplinarità, transdisciplinarità e complessità. Pur alimentando la curiosità, la flessibilità, l’adattamento, la resilienza e la speranza, nell’attuale distruttività globale con lo smantellamento del tessuto sociale, abbiamo ancora più bisogno di tenerci per mano e di lavorare più duramente in ulteriori livelli di Trasform-Azioni. Torino è stata la prima città a ospitare una CR nel 2019, da qui è partita la diffusione del crescente numero di altre comunità RC italiane. L’inter-fecondazione tra CR e metodi simili potrebbe intensificare la nostra cura per il futuro nell’immaginario creativo o nella realizzazione di nuove azioni di trasform-Azioni – così necessarie per tutti noi, professionisti e cittadini.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Baranger M. e Baranger W. (2009). The Work of Confluence. Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field. London: Karnac.
Bion R.W. (2005). The Italian Seminars. London and New York: Routledge.
Cassullo G. (2024). “Evolution of Field Theory in Italy”. Presentation at the Città Sant’Angelo Conference on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming.
De Maré P., Piper R. e Thompson S. (1991). From Hate, through Dialogue, to Culture in the Large Group. London and New York: Routledge.
Foulkes S.H. (1990). The Position of Group Analysis Today. In: Selected Papers. London: Karnac.
Fubini F. (2024). “Social Dreaming Bridges Silos”. Presentation at the Città Sant’Angelo Conference on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming.
Harrison T. (2018). Social Fields, Battle Fields and Northfield: The Legacy of the “Northfield Experiments”. Group Analysis, 51, 4: 442-454. DOI: 10.1177/0533316418803442
Harrison T. (2000). Bion, Rickman, Foulkes, and the Northfield Experiments: Advancing on a Different Front. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Hinshelwood R. (2018). John Rickman Behind the Scenes: The Influence of Lewin’s Field Theory on Practice, Countertransference, and W.R. Bion. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 99, 6: 1409-1423. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2018.1508354
Hopper E. (2003). Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of Group. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Hopper E. (2024). The Tripartite Matrix in the Developing Theory and Expanding Practice of Group Analysis. The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies. Vol. 4. London and New York: Routledge.
Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds. (2011). The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. Vol. I. London: Karnac.
Kakutani Michiko (2013). The Lasting Power of Dr. King’s Dream Speech. The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2021. Retrieved August 28, 2021.
King P. (2003). Introduction. In: King P., Ed., No Ordinary Psychoanalyst: The Exceptional Contribution of John Rickman. London: Karnac.
Menzies D.E. (2018). Henderson and Beyond: Did the Northfield Experiments Influence Henderson and its Legacy? Group Analysis, 51, 4: 463-474. DOI: 10.1177/0533316418808173
Mojović M. (2005). Grupna psihička skloništa u maloj analitičkoj grupi (Group Psychic Retreats in a Small Group-Analytic Group). Završni rad DGAB Beograd.
Mojović M. (2007a). The Impact of the Post-Totalitarian Social Context on the Group Matrix. Group Analysis, 40, 3: 394-403. DOI: 10.1177/0533316407081758
Mojović M. (2007b). “Psychic Retreats as Defences from the Ugliness of War Gorgons and the Power of the Analytic Group”. Paper presented at the Regional IAGP Barcelona.
Mojović M. (2011). Manifestations of Psychic Retreats in Social Systems. In: Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds., The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. London: Karnac.
Mojović M. (2016). Serbian Reflective-Citizens Flourishing in the Leaking Containers. Response to 40th Foulkes Lecture. Group Analysis, 49, 4: 370-384. DOI: 10.1177/0533316416676449
Mojović M. (2019). Serbian Reflective Citizens and the Art of Psychosocial Listening and Dialogue at the Caesura. J. of Psychosocial Studies, 2, 1-2: 81-95. DOI: 10.1332/147867319X15608718110934
Mojović M. (2021). Reflective Citizens Koinonia. Methode und Internationalisierung. Die Kunst des Zuhörens und des Dialogs. In: Gruppenanalyse. Zeitschrift für gruppenanalytische Psychotherapie, Beratung und Supervision. 31. Jahrgang 2021, Heft 1 und 2. Heidelberg: Mattes Verlag.
Mojović M. (2022). Thinking Together in Reflective Citizens. In: Ringer M., Gordon R. and Vandenbussche B., Eds., The Collective Spark. Igniting Thinking in Groups, Teams and the Wider World. Gent: Grafishe Cel.
Mojović M. (2024a). “Humanizing Organizations in the Learning & Therapeutic Community Koinonia-Art Belgrade”. Keynote at the GAS Slovenia Workshop “How to Stay Human in Organizations”.
Mojović M. (2024b). “Systems-Psychodynamic Guerilla Style within Development of the Belgrade Koinonia-Art Training in the Traumatized Psycho-Social Fields with Paradigm Clashes”. Presentation at ISPSO Conference Sophia.
Mojović M. (2024c). Tesla Transformers in Group Analytic Fields in Serbia, In: Snell E., Morgan-Jones R. e Loewenthal D., Eds., Developments in Field Theory for Psychotherapists, Psychoanalysts and Counsellors. London: Routledge.
Mojović M. e Satarić J. (2024). Tesla and the Social Unconscious of Serbs. The Dance of Science with Poetry – the Earthly with the Heavenly. In: Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds., The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. Vol. 4. London: Routledge.
Montuori A. (2020). Social Creativity. California Institute of Integral Studies San Francisco, CA, United States: Elsevier.
Morin E. (2024). The Progress of Knowledge Has Led to a Regression of Thought. Testo disponibile al sito: https://footnotes2plato.com/2024/02/03/the-progress-of-knowledge-has-led-to-a-regression-of-thought-by-edgar-morin/
Neri C. (1998). Group. London: Karnac.
Penna C. (2024). “Landscapes of War Times and Landscapes of Peace Times”. Opening Lecture at the Conference in Città Sant’Angelo on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming South American Work Pichon-Rivière.
Penna C. e Hopper E. (2024). Fields, Systems and Silos: From Electromechanics to the Matrix. A Commentary on “Developments in Field Theory”. In: Snell E., Morgan-Jones R. e Loewenthal D., Eds., Developments in Field Theory for Psychotherapists, Psychoanalysts and Counsellors. London: Routledge.
Rickman J. (1943). The Psychiatric Interview in the Social Setting of a War Office Selection Board. In: King P., Ed., No Ordinary Psychoanalyst: The Exceptional Contributions of John Rickman. London: Karnac, 2003.
Rickman J. (1951). Number and the Human Sciences. In: Rickman J., Selected Contributions to Psycho-Analysis. London: Karnac, 2003.
Vansina L. (2013). Humanness in Organizations. A Psychodynamic Contribution. London: Karnac.
Vecco M. (2020). Genius Loci as Meta Concept. J. of Cultural Heritage, 41: 225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.07.001

Parole chiave

Cittadinanza Riflessiva, Koinonia, Campi gruppoanalitici, Interventi psicosociali.

Come citare

Mojović, M. (2026). TrasformAzioni con il metodo di Cittadinanza Riflessiva Koinonia. Gruppi - Open Access, (2). https://doi.org/10.3280/gruoa2-2024oa22917

[1] Baranger M. e Baranger W. (2009). The Work of Confluence. Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field. London: Karnac.

[2] Bion R.W. (2005). The Italian Seminars. London and New York: Routledge.

[3] Cassullo G. (2024). “Evolution of Field Theory in Italy”. Presentation at the Città Sant’Angelo Conference on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming.

[4] De Maré P., Piper R. e Thompson S. (1991). From Hate, through Dialogue, to Culture in the Large Group. London and New York: Routledge.

[5] Foulkes S.H. (1990). The Position of Group Analysis Today. In: Selected Papers. London: Karnac.

[6] Fubini F. (2024). “Social Dreaming Bridges Silos”. Presentation at the Città Sant’Angelo Conference on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming.

[7] Harrison T. (2018). Social Fields, Battle Fields and Northfield: The Legacy of the “Northfield Experiments”. Group Analysis, 51, 4: 442-454. DOI: 10.1177/0533316418803442

[8] Harrison T. (2000). Bion, Rickman, Foulkes, and the Northfield Experiments: Advancing on a Different Front. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

[9] Hinshelwood R. (2018). John Rickman Behind the Scenes: The Influence of Lewin’s Field Theory on Practice, Countertransference, and W.R. Bion. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 99, 6: 1409-1423. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2018.1508354

[10] Hopper E. (2003). Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of Group. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

[11] Hopper E. (2024). The Tripartite Matrix in the Developing Theory and Expanding Practice of Group Analysis. The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies. Vol. 4. London and New York: Routledge.

[12] Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds. (2011). The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. Vol. I. London: Karnac.

[13] Kakutani Michiko (2013). The Lasting Power of Dr. King’s Dream Speech. The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2021. Retrieved August 28, 2021.

[14] King P. (2003). Introduction. In: King P., Ed., No Ordinary Psychoanalyst: The Exceptional Contribution of John Rickman. London: Karnac.

[15] Menzies D.E. (2018). Henderson and Beyond: Did the Northfield Experiments Influence Henderson and its Legacy? Group Analysis, 51, 4: 463-474. DOI: 10.1177/0533316418808173

[16] Mojović M. (2005). Grupna psihička skloništa u maloj analitičkoj grupi (Group Psychic Retreats in a Small Group-Analytic Group). Završni rad DGAB Beograd.

[17] Mojović M. (2007a). The Impact of the Post-Totalitarian Social Context on the Group Matrix. Group Analysis, 40, 3: 394-403. DOI: 10.1177/0533316407081758

[18] Mojović M. (2007b). “Psychic Retreats as Defences from the Ugliness of War Gorgons and the Power of the Analytic Group”. Paper presented at the Regional IAGP Barcelona.

[19] Mojović M. (2011). Manifestations of Psychic Retreats in Social Systems. In: Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds., The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. London: Karnac.

[20] Mojović M. (2016). Serbian Reflective-Citizens Flourishing in the Leaking Containers. Response to 40th Foulkes Lecture. Group Analysis, 49, 4: 370-384. DOI: 10.1177/0533316416676449

[21] Mojović M. (2019). Serbian Reflective Citizens and the Art of Psychosocial Listening and Dialogue at the Caesura. J. of Psychosocial Studies, 2, 1-2: 81-95. DOI: 10.1332/147867319X15608718110934

[22] Mojović M. (2021). Reflective Citizens Koinonia. Methode und Internationalisierung. Die Kunst des Zuhörens und des Dialogs. In: Gruppenanalyse. Zeitschrift für gruppenanalytische Psychotherapie, Beratung und Supervision. 31. Jahrgang 2021, Heft 1 und 2. Heidelberg: Mattes Verlag.

[23] Mojović M. (2022). Thinking Together in Reflective Citizens. In: Ringer M., Gordon R. and Vandenbussche B., Eds., The Collective Spark. Igniting Thinking in Groups, Teams and the Wider World. Gent: Grafishe Cel.

[24] Mojović M. (2024a). “Humanizing Organizations in the Learning & Therapeutic Community Koinonia-Art Belgrade”. Keynote at the GAS Slovenia Workshop “How to Stay Human in Organizations”.

[25] Mojović M. (2024b). “Systems-Psychodynamic Guerilla Style within Development of the Belgrade Koinonia-Art Training in the Traumatized Psycho-Social Fields with Paradigm Clashes”. Presentation at ISPSO Conference Sophia.

[26] Mojović M. (2024c). Tesla Transformers in Group Analytic Fields in Serbia, In: Snell E., Morgan-Jones R. e Loewenthal D., Eds., Developments in Field Theory for Psychotherapists, Psychoanalysts and Counsellors. London: Routledge.

[27] Mojović M. e Satarić J. (2024). Tesla and the Social Unconscious of Serbs. The Dance of Science with Poetry – the Earthly with the Heavenly. In: Hopper E. e Weinberg H., Eds., The Social Unconscious in Persons, Group and Societies. Vol. 4. London: Routledge.

[28] Montuori A. (2020). Social Creativity. California Institute of Integral Studies San Francisco, CA, United States: Elsevier.

[29] Morin E. (2024). The Progress of Knowledge Has Led to a Regression of Thought. Testo disponibile al sito: https://footnotes2plato.com/2024/02/03/the-progress-of-knowledge-has-led-to-a-regression-of-thought-by-edgar-morin/

[30] Neri C. (1998). Group. London: Karnac.

[31] Penna C. (2024). “Landscapes of War Times and Landscapes of Peace Times”. Opening Lecture at the Conference in Città Sant’Angelo on Bridging Silos in Field Theory-Psychoanalytic, Group Analysis, Group Relation and Social Dreaming South American Work Pichon-Rivière.

[32] Penna C. e Hopper E. (2024). Fields, Systems and Silos: From Electromechanics to the Matrix. A Commentary on “Developments in Field Theory”. In: Snell E., Morgan-Jones R. e Loewenthal D., Eds., Developments in Field Theory for Psychotherapists, Psychoanalysts and Counsellors. London: Routledge.

[33] Rickman J. (1943). The Psychiatric Interview in the Social Setting of a War Office Selection Board. In: King P., Ed., No Ordinary Psychoanalyst: The Exceptional Contributions of John Rickman. London: Karnac, 2003.

[34] Rickman J. (1951). Number and the Human Sciences. In: Rickman J., Selected Contributions to Psycho-Analysis. London: Karnac, 2003.

[35] Vansina L. (2013). Humanness in Organizations. A Psychodynamic Contribution. London: Karnac.

[36] Vecco M. (2020). Genius Loci as Meta Concept. J. of Cultural Heritage, 41: 225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.07.001